Fact or Factitious? Contextualized Opinion Spam Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.15296v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 00:59:06 GMT
• Title: Fact or Factitious? Contextualized Opinion Spam Detection
• Authors: Stefan Kennedy and Niall Walsh, Kirils Sloka, Jennifer Foster, Andrew McCarren
• Abstract summary: We apply a number machine learning approaches found to be effective, and introduce our own approach by fine-tuning state of the art contextualised embeddings. The results we obtain show the potential of contextualised embeddings for fake review detection, and lay the groundwork for future research in this area.
• Score: 9.415901312074336
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this paper we perform an analytic comparison of a number of techniques used to detect fake and deceptive online reviews. We apply a number machine learning approaches found to be effective, and introduce our own approach by fine-tuning state of the art contextualised embeddings. The results we obtain show the potential of contextualised embeddings for fake review detection, and lay the groundwork for future research in this area.

Related papers

• Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Explainable AI Methods for Deepfake Detection [12.179602756337818]
  This framework assesses the ability of an explanation method to spot the regions of a fake image with the biggest influence on the decision of the deepfake detector. We conduct a comparative study using a state-of-the-art model for deepfake detection that has been trained on the FaceForensics++ dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T12:32:14Z)
• Unmasking Falsehoods in Reviews: An Exploration of NLP Techniques [0.0]
  This research paper proposes a machine learning model to identify deceptive reviews. To accomplish this, an n-gram model and max features are developed to effectively identify deceptive content. The experimental results reveal that the passive aggressive classifier stands out among the various algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T06:35:43Z)
• Stance Detection: A Practical Guide to Classifying Political Beliefs in Text [0.0]
  This paper advances text analysis methods by precisely defining stance detection. I present three distinct approaches: supervised classification, natural language inference, and in-context learning with generative language models. I provide guidance on application and validation techniques, as well as coding tutorials for implementation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-02T18:49:12Z)
• MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text Detection [54.81446366272403]
  This paper proposes the first benchmark framework for MGT detection against powerful large language models (LLMs) We show that a larger number of words in general leads to better performance and most detection methods can achieve similar performance with much fewer training samples. Our findings indicate that the model-based detection methods still perform well in the text attribution task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-26T21:12:36Z)
• Verifying the Robustness of Automatic Credibility Assessment [79.08422736721764]
  Text classification methods have been widely investigated as a way to detect content of low credibility. In some cases insignificant changes in input text can mislead the models. We introduce BODEGA: a benchmark for testing both victim models and attack methods on misinformation detection tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T16:11:47Z)
• Mitigating Human and Computer Opinion Fraud via Contrastive Learning [0.0]
  We introduce the novel approach towards fake text reviews detection in collaborative filtering recommender systems. The existing algorithms concentrate on detecting the fake reviews, generated by language models and ignore the texts, written by dishonest users. We propose the contrastive learning-based architecture, which utilizes the user demographic characteristics, along with the text reviews, as the additional evidence against fakes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T12:02:28Z)
• The Familiarity Hypothesis: Explaining the Behavior of Deep Open Set Methods [86.39044549664189]
  Anomaly detection algorithms for feature-vector data identify anomalies as outliers, but outlier detection has not worked well in deep learning. This paper proposes the Familiarity Hypothesis that these methods succeed because they are detecting the absence of familiar learned features rather than the presence of novelty. The paper concludes with a discussion of whether familiarity detection is an inevitable consequence of representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-04T18:32:58Z)
• Automated Evidence Collection for Fake News Detection [11.324403127916877]
  We propose a novel approach that improves over the current automatic fake news detection approaches. Our approach extracts supporting evidence from the web articles and then selects appropriate text to be treated as evidence sets. Our experiments, using both machine learning and deep learning-based methods, help perform an extensive evaluation of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-13T09:38:41Z)
• Human-in-the-Loop Disinformation Detection: Stance, Sentiment, or Something Else? [93.91375268580806]
  Both politics and pandemics have recently provided ample motivation for the development of machine learning-enabled disinformation (a.k.a. fake news) detection algorithms. Existing literature has focused primarily on the fully-automated case, but the resulting techniques cannot reliably detect disinformation on the varied topics, sources, and time scales required for military applications. By leveraging an already-available analyst as a human-in-the-loop, canonical machine learning techniques of sentiment analysis, aspect-based sentiment analysis, and stance detection become plausible methods to use for a partially-automated disinformation detection system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T13:30:34Z)
• Comprehensive Studies for Arbitrary-shape Scene Text Detection [78.50639779134944]
  We propose a unified framework for the bottom-up based scene text detection methods. Under the unified framework, we ensure the consistent settings for non-core modules. With the comprehensive investigations and elaborate analyses, it reveals the advantages and disadvantages of previous models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-25T13:18:55Z)
• Anomalous Example Detection in Deep Learning: A Survey [98.2295889723002]
  This survey tries to provide a structured and comprehensive overview of the research on anomaly detection for Deep Learning applications. We provide a taxonomy for existing techniques based on their underlying assumptions and adopted approaches. We highlight the unsolved research challenges while applying anomaly detection techniques in DL systems and present some high-impact future research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-16T02:47:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.