No purification ontology, no quantum paradoxes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04011v1
• Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2020 16:20:06 GMT
• Title: No purification ontology, no quantum paradoxes
• Authors: Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano
• Abstract summary: It is almost believed that in quantum theory the two following statements hold: 1) all transformations are achieved by a unitary interaction followed by a von Neumann measurement; 2) all mixed states are marginals of pure entangled states. I name this doctrine the dogma purification of ontology. The source of the dogma is the original von Neumann axiomatisation of the theory.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: It is almost universally believed that in quantum theory the two following statements hold: 1) all transformations are achieved by a unitary interaction followed by a von Neumann measurement; 2) all mixed states are marginals of pure entangled states. I name this doctrine the dogma of purification ontology. The source of the dogma is the original von Neumann axiomatisation of the theory, which largely relies on the Schroedinger equation as a postulate, which holds in a nonrelativistic context, and whose operator version holds only in free quantum field theory, but no longer in the interacting theory. In the present paper I prove that both ontologies of unitarity and state purity are unfalsifiable, even in principle, and therefore axiomatically spurious. I propose instead a minimal four-postulate axiomatisation: 1) associate a Hilbert space HA to each system A; 2) compose two systems by the tensor product rule HAB = HAxHB; 3) associate a transformation from system A to B to a quantum operation, i.e. to a completely positive trace-non-increasing map between the trace-class operators of A and B; 4) (Born rule) evaluate all joint probabilities through that of a special type of quantum operation: the state preparation. I then conclude that quantum paradoxes-such as the Schroedinger-cat's, and, most relevantly, the information paradox-are originated only by the dogma of purification ontology, and they are no longer paradoxes of the theory in the minimal formulation. For the same reason, most interpretations of the theory (e.g. many-world, relational, Darwinism, transactional, von Neumann-Wigner, time-symmetric, ...) interpret the same dogma, not the strict theory stripped of the spurious postulates.

Related papers

• Minimal operational theories: classical theories with quantum features [41.94295877935867]
  We show that almost all minimal theories with conditioning satisfy two quantum no-go theorems. As a relevant example, we construct a minimal toy-theory with conditioning where all systems are classical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T16:24:09Z)
• Minimal Equational Theories for Quantum Circuits [44.99833362998488]
  We show that any true equation on quantum circuits can be derived from simple rules. One of our main contributions is to prove the minimality of the equational theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T17:11:25Z)
• Unitary time evolution in quantum mechanics is a stronger physical postulate than linear time evolution [0.0]
  We discuss two mathematically distinct but physically equivalent formulations of the axioms of quantum mechanics. The unitarity of time evolution is arguably better thought of as a logically independent and experimentally falsifiable axiom of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T03:14:32Z)
• Connecting classical finite exchangeability to quantum theory [69.62715388742298]
  Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics. We show how a de Finetti-like representation theorem for finitely exchangeable sequences requires a mathematical representation which is formally equivalent to quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T17:15:19Z)
• Quantum Theory Needs (And Probably Has) Real Reduction [0.0]
  It appears that for quantum theory to be viable in a realist sense, it must possess genuine, physical non-unitarity. Penrose's theory of gravitation-induced collapse and the Transactional Interpretation are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T21:25:23Z)
• Is there a finite complete set of monotones in any quantum resource theory? [39.58317527488534]
  We show that there does not exist a finite set of resource monotones which completely determines all state transformations. We show that totally ordered theories allow for free transformations between all pure states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T18:28:36Z)
• Quantum mechanics? It's all fun and games until someone loses an $i$ [0.0]
  QBism regards quantum mechanics as an addition to probability theory. Recent work has demonstrated that reference devices employing symmetric informationally complete POVMs (or SICs) achieve a minimal quantumness. We attempt to identify the optimal reference device in the first real dimension without a SIC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T15:15:16Z)
• Branch-counting in the Everett Interpretation of quantum mechanics [0.0]
  Well-known branch-counting rule, for realistic models of measurements, fails this test. New rule hinges on the use of decoherence theory in defining branching structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-16T16:50:07Z)
• Stochastic approximate state conversion for entanglement and general quantum resource theories [41.94295877935867]
  An important problem in any quantum resource theory is to determine how quantum states can be converted into each other. Very few results have been presented on the intermediate regime between probabilistic and approximate transformations. We show that these bounds imply an upper bound on the rates for various classes of states under probabilistic transformations. We also show that the deterministic version of the single copy bounds can be applied for drawing limitations on the manipulation of quantum channels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-24T17:29:43Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Indeterminism and Undecidability [0.0]
  Chaitin's follow-up to Goedel's (first) incompleteness theorem can be proved. The main point is that Bell and others did not exploit the full empirical content of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-07T11:06:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.