Attentive Social Recommendation: Towards User And Item Diversities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04797v2
• Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 00:27:52 GMT
• Title: Attentive Social Recommendation: Towards User And Item Diversities
• Authors: Dongsheng Luo, Yuchen Bian, Xiang Zhang, Jun Huan
• Abstract summary: We propose an attentive social recommendation system (ASR) to address this issue. First, in ASR, Rec-conv graph network layers are proposed to extract the social factor, user-rating and item-rated factors. Second, a disentangling strategy is applied for diverse rating values.
• Score: 19.68134197265983
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Social recommendation system is to predict unobserved user-item rating values by taking advantage of user-user social relation and user-item ratings. However, user/item diversities in social recommendations are not well utilized in the literature. Especially, inter-factor (social and rating factors) relations and distinct rating values need taking into more consideration. In this paper, we propose an attentive social recommendation system (ASR) to address this issue from two aspects. First, in ASR, Rec-conv graph network layers are proposed to extract the social factor, user-rating and item-rated factors and then automatically assign contribution weights to aggregate these factors into the user/item embedding vectors. Second, a disentangling strategy is applied for diverse rating values. Extensive experiments on benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness and advantages of our ASR.

Related papers

• Revisiting Reciprocal Recommender Systems: Metrics, Formulation, and Method [60.364834418531366]
  We propose five new evaluation metrics that comprehensively and accurately assess the performance of RRS. We formulate the RRS from a causal perspective, formulating recommendations as bilateral interventions. We introduce a reranking strategy to maximize matching outcomes, as measured by the proposed metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T07:21:02Z)
• Balancing User Preferences by Social Networks: A Condition-Guided Social Recommendation Model for Mitigating Popularity Bias [64.73474454254105]
  Social recommendation models weave social interactions into their design to provide uniquely personalized recommendation results for users. Existing social recommendation models fail to address the issues of popularity bias and the redundancy of social information. We propose a Condition-Guided Social Recommendation Model (named CGSoRec) to mitigate the model's popularity bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T02:45:01Z)
• Learning Social Graph for Inactive User Recommendation [50.090904659803854]
  LSIR learns an optimal social graph structure for social recommendation, especially for inactive users. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that LSIR achieves significant improvements of up to 129.58% on NDCG in inactive user recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T03:40:36Z)
• Rethinking the Evaluation of Dialogue Systems: Effects of User Feedback on Crowdworkers and LLMs [57.16442740983528]
  In ad-hoc retrieval, evaluation relies heavily on user actions, including implicit feedback. The role of user feedback in annotators' assessment of turns in a conversational perception has been little studied. We focus on how the evaluation of task-oriented dialogue systems ( TDSs) is affected by considering user feedback, explicit or implicit, as provided through the follow-up utterance of a turn being evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T16:45:50Z)
• Concept -- An Evaluation Protocol on Conversational Recommender Systems with System-centric and User-centric Factors [68.68418801681965]
  We propose a new and inclusive evaluation protocol, Concept, which integrates both system- and user-centric factors. Our protocol, Concept, serves a dual purpose. First, it provides an overview of the pros and cons in current CRS models. Second, it pinpoints the problem of low usability in the "omnipotent" ChatGPT and offers a comprehensive reference guide for evaluating CRS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T08:56:48Z)
• Causal Disentanglement for Regulating Social Influence Bias in Social Recommendation [12.120586712440673]
  Social recommendation systems face the problem of social influence bias, which can lead to an overemphasis on recommending items that friends have interacted with. We propose a Causal Disentanglement-based framework for Regulating Social influence Bias in social recommendation, named CDRSB, to improve recommendation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T09:48:48Z)
• When Search Meets Recommendation: Learning Disentangled Search Representation for Recommendation [56.98380787425388]
  We propose a search-Enhanced framework for the Sequential Recommendation (SESRec) SESRec disentangling similar and dissimilar representations within S&R behaviors. Experiments on both industrial and public datasets demonstrate that SESRec consistently outperforms state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T09:04:50Z)
• Simpson's Paradox in Recommender Fairness: Reconciling differences between per-user and aggregated evaluations [16.053419956606557]
  We argue that two notions of fairness in ranking and recommender systems can lead to opposite conclusions. We reconcile these notions and show that the tension is due to differences in distributions of users where items are relevant. Based on this new understanding, practitioners might be interested in either notions, but might face challenges with the per-user metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T12:43:32Z)
• FairSR: Fairness-aware Sequential Recommendation through Multi-Task Learning with Preference Graph Embeddings [14.543386085745192]
  Sequential recommendation learns from the temporal dynamics of user-item interactions to predict the next ones. This paper aims at bringing a marriage between SR and algorithmic fairness. We propose a novel fairness-aware sequential recommendation task, in which a new metric, interaction fairness, is defined.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-30T17:33:51Z)
• Causal Disentanglement with Network Information for Debiased Recommendations [34.698181166037564]
  Recent research proposes to debias by modeling a recommender system from a causal perspective. The critical challenge in this setting is accounting for the hidden confounders. We propose to leverage network information (i.e., user-social and user-item networks) to better approximate hidden confounders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-14T20:55:11Z)
• A Robust Reputation-based Group Ranking System and its Resistance to Bribery [8.300507994596416]
  We propose a new reputation-based ranking system, utilizing multipartite ratingworks. We study its resistance to bribery and how to design optimal bribing strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-13T22:28:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.