Determining Question-Answer Plausibility in Crowdsourced Datasets Using Multi-Task Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04883v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 04:11:44 GMT
• Title: Determining Question-Answer Plausibility in Crowdsourced Datasets Using Multi-Task Learning
• Authors: Rachel Gardner, Maya Varma, Clare Zhu, Ranjay Krishna
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel task for automated quality analysis and data cleaning: question-answer (QA) plausibility. Given a machine or user-generated question and a crowd-sourced response from a social media user, we determine if the question and response are valid. We evaluate the ability of our models to generate a clean, usable question-answer dataset.
• Score: 10.742152224470317
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Datasets extracted from social networks and online forums are often prone to the pitfalls of natural language, namely the presence of unstructured and noisy data. In this work, we seek to enable the collection of high-quality question-answer datasets from social media by proposing a novel task for automated quality analysis and data cleaning: question-answer (QA) plausibility. Given a machine or user-generated question and a crowd-sourced response from a social media user, we determine if the question and response are valid; if so, we identify the answer within the free-form response. We design BERT-based models to perform the QA plausibility task, and we evaluate the ability of our models to generate a clean, usable question-answer dataset. Our highest-performing approach consists of a single-task model which determines the plausibility of the question, followed by a multi-task model which evaluates the plausibility of the response as well as extracts answers (Question Plausibility AUROC=0.75, Response Plausibility AUROC=0.78, Answer Extraction F1=0.665).

Related papers

• RAG-ConfusionQA: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Confusing Questions [52.33835101586687]
  Conversational AI agents use Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to provide verifiable document-grounded responses to user inquiries. This paper presents a novel synthetic data generation method to efficiently create a diverse set of context-grounded confusing questions from a given document corpus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T16:11:29Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Language Modeling for Selective Question Answering [107.47864420630923]
  We present an automatic large language model (LLM) conversion approach that produces uncertainty-aware LLMs. Our approach is model- and data-agnostic, is computationally-efficient, and does not rely on external models or systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-26T22:47:54Z)
• UNK-VQA: A Dataset and a Probe into the Abstention Ability of Multi-modal Large Models [55.22048505787125]
  This paper contributes a comprehensive dataset, called UNK-VQA. We first augment the existing data via deliberate perturbations on either the image or question. We then extensively evaluate the zero- and few-shot performance of several emerging multi-modal large models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T02:38:09Z)
• An Empirical Comparison of LM-based Question and Answer Generation Methods [79.31199020420827]
  Question and answer generation (QAG) consists of generating a set of question-answer pairs given a context. In this paper, we establish baselines with three different QAG methodologies that leverage sequence-to-sequence language model (LM) fine-tuning. Experiments show that an end-to-end QAG model, which is computationally light at both training and inference times, is generally robust and outperforms other more convoluted approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T14:59:53Z)
• Question Answering Survey: Directions, Challenges, Datasets, Evaluation Matrices [0.0]
  The research directions of QA field are analyzed based on the type of question, answer type, source of evidence-answer, and modeling approach. This detailed followed by open challenges of the field like automatic question generation, similarity detection and, low resource availability for a language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-07T08:53:40Z)
• Generating Self-Contained and Summary-Centric Question Answer Pairs via Differentiable Reward Imitation Learning [7.2745835227138045]
  We propose a model for generating question-answer pairs (QA pairs) with self-contained, summary-centric questions and length-constrained, article-summarizing answers. This dataset is used to learn a QA pair generation model producing summaries as answers that balance brevity with sufficiency jointly with their corresponding questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T06:34:55Z)
• A Wrong Answer or a Wrong Question? An Intricate Relationship between Question Reformulation and Answer Selection in Conversational Question Answering [15.355557454305776]
  We show that question rewriting (QR) of the conversational context allows to shed more light on this phenomenon. We present the results of this analysis on the TREC CAsT and QuAC (CANARD) datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T06:29:51Z)
• Unsupervised Evaluation for Question Answering with Transformers [46.16837670041594]
  We investigate the hidden representations of questions, answers, and contexts in transformer-based QA architectures. We observe a consistent pattern in the answer representations, which we show can be used to automatically evaluate whether or not a predicted answer is correct. We are able to predict whether or not a model's answer is correct with 91.37% accuracy SQuAD, and 80.7% accuracy on SubjQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T07:03:30Z)
• Selective Question Answering under Domain Shift [90.021577320085]
  Abstention policies based solely on the model's softmax probabilities fare poorly, since models are overconfident on out-of-domain inputs. We train a calibrator to identify inputs on which the QA model errs, and abstain when it predicts an error is likely. Our method answers 56% of questions while maintaining 80% accuracy; in contrast, directly using the model's probabilities only answers 48% at 80% accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T19:13:21Z)
• Template-Based Question Generation from Retrieved Sentences for Improved Unsupervised Question Answering [98.48363619128108]
  We propose an unsupervised approach to training QA models with generated pseudo-training data. We show that generating questions for QA training by applying a simple template on a related, retrieved sentence rather than the original context sentence improves downstream QA performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-24T17:57:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.