Detecting Synthetic Phenomenology in a Contained Artificial General
Intelligence
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.05807v1
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 16:10:38 GMT
- Title: Detecting Synthetic Phenomenology in a Contained Artificial General
Intelligence
- Authors: Jason M. Pittman, Ashlyn Hanks
- Abstract summary: This work provides an analysis of existing measures of phenomenology through qualia.
It extends those ideas into the context of a contained artificial general intelligence.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Human-like intelligence in a machine is a contentious subject. Whether
mankind should or should not pursue the creation of artificial general
intelligence is hotly debated. As well, researchers have aligned in opposing
factions according to whether mankind can create it. For our purposes, we
assume mankind can and will do so. Thus, it becomes necessary to contemplate
how to do so in a safe and trusted manner -- enter the idea of boxing or
containment. As part of such thinking, we wonder how a phenomenology might be
detected given the operational constraints imposed by any potential containment
system. Accordingly, this work provides an analysis of existing measures of
phenomenology through qualia and extends those ideas into the context of a
contained artificial general intelligence.
Related papers
- Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom.
While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems.
We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z) - Spontaneous Theory of Mind for Artificial Intelligence [2.7624021966289605]
We argue for a principled approach to studying and developing AI Theory of Mind (ToM)
We suggest that a robust, or general, ASI will respond to prompts textitand spontaneously engage in social reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-16T22:41:13Z) - (Ir)rationality in AI: State of the Art, Research Challenges and Open
Questions [2.9008806248012333]
The concept of rationality is central to the field of artificial intelligence.
There is no unified definition of what constitutes a rational agent.
We consider irrational behaviours that can prove to be optimal in certain scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-28T19:01:09Z) - The Generative AI Paradox: "What It Can Create, It May Not Understand" [81.89252713236746]
Recent wave of generative AI has sparked excitement and concern over potentially superhuman levels of artificial intelligence.
At the same time, models still show basic errors in understanding that would not be expected even in non-expert humans.
This presents us with an apparent paradox: how do we reconcile seemingly superhuman capabilities with the persistence of errors that few humans would make?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T18:07:07Z) - AI for Mathematics: A Cognitive Science Perspective [86.02346372284292]
Mathematics is one of the most powerful conceptual systems developed and used by the human species.
Rapid progress in AI, particularly propelled by advances in large language models (LLMs), has sparked renewed, widespread interest in building such systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T02:00:31Z) - Circumventing interpretability: How to defeat mind-readers [0.0]
misaligned artificial intelligence will have a convergent instrumental incentive to make its thoughts difficult for us to interpret.
I discuss many ways that a capable AI might circumvent scalable interpretability methods and suggest a framework for thinking about these potential future risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-21T23:52:42Z) - An argument for the impossibility of machine intelligence [0.0]
We define what it is to be an agent (device) that could be the bearer of AI.
We show that the mainstream definitions of intelligence' are too weak even to capture what is involved when we ascribe intelligence to an insect.
We identify the properties that an AI agent would need to possess in order to be the bearer of intelligence by this definition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-20T08:54:48Z) - Abstract Spatial-Temporal Reasoning via Probabilistic Abduction and
Execution [97.50813120600026]
Spatial-temporal reasoning is a challenging task in Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Recent works have focused on an abstract reasoning task of this kind -- Raven's Progressive Matrices ( RPM)
We propose a neuro-symbolic Probabilistic Abduction and Execution learner (PrAE) learner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-26T02:42:18Z) - Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition [108.89281493851358]
A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles.
This work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing.
The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-30T18:29:25Z) - Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI)
This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z) - Dynamic Cognition Applied to Value Learning in Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
Several researchers in the area are trying to develop a robust, beneficial, and safe concept of artificial intelligence.
It is of utmost importance that artificial intelligent agents have their values aligned with human values.
A possible approach to this problem would be to use theoretical models such as SED.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-12T03:58:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.