Related papers: Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube

Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.12843v2
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:59:18 GMT
Title: Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube
Authors: Homa Hosseinmardi, Amir Ghasemian, Aaron Clauset, Markus Mobius, David M. Rothschild, Duncan J. Watts
Abstract summary: Recently, YouTube's scale has fueled concerns that YouTube users are being radicalized via a combination of biased recommendations and ostensibly apolitical anti-woke channels. Here we test this hypothesis using a representative panel of more than 300,000 Americans and their individual-level browsing behavior. We find no evidence that engagement with far-right content is caused by YouTube recommendations systematically, nor do we find clear evidence that anti-woke channels serve as a gateway to the far right.
Score: 1.2820564400223966
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: Although it is under-studied relative to other social media platforms, YouTube is arguably the largest and most engaging online media consumption platform in the world. Recently, YouTube's scale has fueled concerns that YouTube users are being radicalized via a combination of biased recommendations and ostensibly apolitical anti-woke channels, both of which have been claimed to direct attention to radical political content. Here we test this hypothesis using a representative panel of more than 300,000 Americans and their individual-level browsing behavior, on and off YouTube, from January 2016 through December 2019. Using a labeled set of political news channels, we find that news consumption on YouTube is dominated by mainstream and largely centrist sources. Consumers of far-right content, while more engaged than average, represent a small and stable percentage of news consumers. However, consumption of anti-woke content, defined in terms of its opposition to progressive intellectual and political agendas, grew steadily in popularity and is correlated with consumption of far-right content off-platform. We find no evidence that engagement with far-right content is caused by YouTube recommendations systematically, nor do we find clear evidence that anti-woke channels serve as a gateway to the far right. Rather, consumption of political content on YouTube appears to reflect individual preferences that extend across the web as a whole.

Related papers

Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
Subscriptions and external links help drive resentful users to alternative and extremist YouTube videos [7.945705756085774]
We show that exposure to alternative and extremist channel videos on YouTube is heavily concentrated among a small group of people with high prior levels of gender and racial resentment. Our findings suggest YouTube's algorithms were not sending people down "rabbit holes" during our observation window in 2020. However, the platform continues to play a key role in facilitating exposure to content from alternative and extremist channels among dedicated audiences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-22T20:22:06Z)
Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
Auditing the Biases Enacted by YouTube for Political Topics in Germany [0.0]
We examine whether YouTube's recommendation system is enacting certain biases. We find that YouTube is recommending increasingly popular but topically unrelated videos. We discuss the strong popularity bias we identified and analyze the link between the popularity of content and emotions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-21T07:53:59Z)
News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
Cross-Partisan Discussions on YouTube: Conservatives Talk to Liberals but Liberals Don't Talk to Conservatives [9.797488793708625]
We find a surprising amount of cross-talk: most users with at least 10 comments posted at least once on both left-leaning and right-leaning YouTube channels. Conservatives were much more likely to comment on left-leaning videos than liberals on right-leaning videos. Cross-partisan replies were more toxic than co-partisan replies on both left-leaning and right-leaning videos.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-12T11:32:37Z)
Political Bias and Factualness in News Sharing across more than 100,000 Online Communities [7.892285386961407]
We conduct the largest study of news sharing on reddit to date, analyzing more than 550 million links spanning 4 years. We find that, compared to left-leaning communities, right-leaning communities have 105% more variance in the political bias of their news sources. We show that extremely biased and low factual content is very concentrated, with 99% of such content being shared in only 0.5% of communities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-17T02:35:13Z)
Perceptions of YouTube's political influence [3.8073142980733]
We surveyed 124 people about their views and experiences around YouTube's political influence. Results revealed diverse, sometimes conflicting views on YouTube's growing political role. Highlights the need for more research, discussion and possibly regulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-09T19:04:08Z)
Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal. Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z)
Mi YouTube es Su YouTube? Analyzing the Cultures using YouTube Thumbnails of Popular Videos [98.87558262467257]
This study explores culture preferences among countries using the thumbnails of YouTube trending videos. Experimental results indicate that the users from similar cultures shares interests in watching similar videos on YouTube.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-27T20:15:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.