Automatic coding of students' writing via Contrastive Representation
Learning in the Wasserstein space
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.13384v2
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:01:35 GMT
- Title: Automatic coding of students' writing via Contrastive Representation
Learning in the Wasserstein space
- Authors: Ruijie Jiang, Julia Gouvea, David Hammer, Eric Miller, Shuchin Aeron
- Abstract summary: This work is a step towards building a statistical machine learning (ML) method for supporting qualitative analyses of students' writing.
We show that the ML algorithm approached the inter-rater reliability of human analysis.
- Score: 6.884245063902909
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Qualitative analysis of verbal data is of central importance in the learning
sciences. It is labor-intensive and time-consuming, however, which limits the
amount of data researchers can include in studies. This work is a step towards
building a statistical machine learning (ML) method for achieving an automated
support for qualitative analyses of students' writing, here specifically in
score laboratory reports in introductory biology for sophistication of
argumentation and reasoning. We start with a set of lab reports from an
undergraduate biology course, scored by a four-level scheme that considers the
complexity of argument structure, the scope of evidence, and the care and
nuance of conclusions. Using this set of labeled data, we show that a popular
natural language modeling processing pipeline, namely vector representation of
words, a.k.a word embeddings, followed by Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) model
for capturing language generation as a state-space model, is able to
quantitatively capture the scoring, with a high Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK)
prediction score, when trained in via a novel contrastive learning set-up. We
show that the ML algorithm approached the inter-rater reliability of human
analysis. Ultimately, we conclude, that machine learning (ML) for natural
language processing (NLP) holds promise for assisting learning sciences
researchers in conducting qualitative studies at much larger scales than is
currently possible.
Related papers
- LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research [1.6312096924271486]
We introduce the Language Agent Biology Benchmark (LAB-Bench)
It is a dataset of over 2,400 multiple choice questions for evaluating AI systems on a range of practical biology research capabilities.
We measure performance of several frontier language models against our benchmark and report results compared to human expert biology researchers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-14T23:52:25Z) - Evolving Knowledge Distillation with Large Language Models and Active
Learning [46.85430680828938]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various NLP tasks.
Previous research has attempted to distill the knowledge of LLMs into smaller models by generating annotated data.
We propose EvoKD: Evolving Knowledge Distillation, which leverages the concept of active learning to interactively enhance the process of data generation using large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T03:55:24Z) - Natural Language Processing for Dialects of a Language: A Survey [56.93337350526933]
State-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) models are trained on massive training corpora, and report a superlative performance on evaluation datasets.
This survey delves into an important attribute of these datasets: the dialect of a language.
Motivated by the performance degradation of NLP models for dialectic datasets and its implications for the equity of language technologies, we survey past research in NLP for dialects in terms of datasets, and approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-11T03:04:38Z) - Evaluating Neural Language Models as Cognitive Models of Language
Acquisition [4.779196219827507]
We argue that some of the most prominent benchmarks for evaluating the syntactic capacities of neural language models may not be sufficiently rigorous.
When trained on small-scale data modeling child language acquisition, the LMs can be readily matched by simple baseline models.
We conclude with suggestions for better connecting LMs with the empirical study of child language acquisition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T00:16:17Z) - Machine-assisted quantitizing designs: augmenting humanities and social sciences with artificial intelligence [0.0]
Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to present an unprecedented opportunity to scale up data analytics in the humanities and social sciences.
We build on mixed methods quantitizing and converting design principles, and feature analysis from linguistics, to transparently integrate human expertise and machine scalability.
The approach is discussed and demonstrated in over a dozen LLM-assisted case studies, covering 9 diverse languages, multiple disciplines and tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-24T14:21:50Z) - UMLS-KGI-BERT: Data-Centric Knowledge Integration in Transformers for
Biomedical Entity Recognition [4.865221751784403]
This work contributes a data-centric paradigm for enriching the language representations of biomedical transformer-encoder LMs by extracting text sequences from the UMLS.
Preliminary results from experiments in the extension of pre-trained LMs as well as training from scratch show that this framework improves downstream performance on multiple biomedical and clinical Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-20T18:08:34Z) - Unsupervised Sentiment Analysis of Plastic Surgery Social Media Posts [91.3755431537592]
The massive collection of user posts across social media platforms is primarily untapped for artificial intelligence (AI) use cases.
Natural language processing (NLP) is a subfield of AI that leverages bodies of documents, known as corpora, to train computers in human-like language understanding.
This study demonstrates that the applied results of unsupervised analysis allow a computer to predict either negative, positive, or neutral user sentiment towards plastic surgery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T20:16:20Z) - Reprogramming Pretrained Language Models for Protein Sequence
Representation Learning [68.75392232599654]
We propose Representation Learning via Dictionary Learning (R2DL), an end-to-end representation learning framework.
R2DL reprograms a pretrained English language model to learn the embeddings of protein sequences.
Our model can attain better accuracy and significantly improve the data efficiency by up to $105$ times over the baselines set by pretrained and standard supervised methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-05T15:55:18Z) - A Unified Understanding of Deep NLP Models for Text Classification [88.35418976241057]
We have developed a visual analysis tool, DeepNLPVis, to enable a unified understanding of NLP models for text classification.
The key idea is a mutual information-based measure, which provides quantitative explanations on how each layer of a model maintains the information of input words in a sample.
A multi-level visualization, which consists of a corpus-level, a sample-level, and a word-level visualization, supports the analysis from the overall training set to individual samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-19T08:55:07Z) - Reprogramming Language Models for Molecular Representation Learning [65.00999660425731]
We propose Representation Reprogramming via Dictionary Learning (R2DL) for adversarially reprogramming pretrained language models for molecular learning tasks.
The adversarial program learns a linear transformation between a dense source model input space (language data) and a sparse target model input space (e.g., chemical and biological molecule data) using a k-SVD solver.
R2DL achieves the baseline established by state of the art toxicity prediction models trained on domain-specific data and outperforms the baseline in a limited training-data setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-07T05:50:27Z) - Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structure [74.04862204427944]
We propose an information-theoretic operationalization of probing as estimating mutual information.
We evaluate on a set of ten typologically diverse languages often underrepresented in NLP research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-07T01:06:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.