Evaluating Neural Language Models as Cognitive Models of Language Acquisition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20093v1
• Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:16:17 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Neural Language Models as Cognitive Models of Language Acquisition
• Authors: H\'ector Javier V\'azquez Mart\'inez, Annika Lea Heuser, Charles Yang, Jordan Kodner
• Abstract summary: We argue that some of the most prominent benchmarks for evaluating the syntactic capacities of neural language models may not be sufficiently rigorous. When trained on small-scale data modeling child language acquisition, the LMs can be readily matched by simple baseline models. We conclude with suggestions for better connecting LMs with the empirical study of child language acquisition.
• Score: 4.779196219827507
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The success of neural language models (LMs) on many technological tasks has brought about their potential relevance as scientific theories of language despite some clear differences between LM training and child language acquisition. In this paper we argue that some of the most prominent benchmarks for evaluating the syntactic capacities of LMs may not be sufficiently rigorous. In particular, we show that the template-based benchmarks lack the structural diversity commonly found in the theoretical and psychological studies of language. When trained on small-scale data modeling child language acquisition, the LMs can be readily matched by simple baseline models. We advocate for the use of the readily available, carefully curated datasets that have been evaluated for gradient acceptability by large pools of native speakers and are designed to probe the structural basis of grammar specifically. On one such dataset, the LI-Adger dataset, LMs evaluate sentences in a way inconsistent with human language users. We conclude with suggestions for better connecting LMs with the empirical study of child language acquisition.

Related papers

• From Babbling to Fluency: Evaluating the Evolution of Language Models in Terms of Human Language Acquisition [6.617999710257379]
  We propose a three-stage framework to assess the abilities of LMs. We evaluate the generative capacities of LMs using methods from linguistic research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T06:31:49Z)
• Boosting the Capabilities of Compact Models in Low-Data Contexts with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation [2.9921619703037274]
  We propose a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) framework backed by a large language model (LLM) to correct the output of a smaller model for the linguistic task of morphological glossing. We leverage linguistic information to make up for the lack of data and trainable parameters, while allowing for inputs from written descriptive grammars interpreted and distilled through an LLM. We show that a compact, RAG-supported model is highly effective in data-scarce settings, achieving a new state-of-the-art for this task and our target languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T04:20:14Z)
• Is Child-Directed Speech Effective Training Data for Language Models? [34.46268640655943]
  We train GPT-2 and RoBERTa models on 29M words of English child-directed speech. We test whether the global developmental ordering or the local discourse ordering of children's training data supports high performance relative to other datasets. These findings support the hypothesis that, rather than proceeding from better data, the child's learning algorithm is substantially more data-efficient than current language modeling techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T08:18:51Z)
• Language Representations Can be What Recommenders Need: Findings and Potentials [57.90679739598295]
  We show that item representations, when linearly mapped from advanced LM representations, yield superior recommendation performance. This outcome suggests the possible homomorphism between the advanced language representation space and an effective item representation space for recommendation. Our findings highlight the connection between language modeling and behavior modeling, which can inspire both natural language processing and recommender system communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T17:05:24Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Language Confusion in LLMs [76.96033035093204]
  We evaluate 15 typologically diverse languages with existing and newly-created English and multilingual prompts. We find that Llama Instruct and Mistral models exhibit high degrees of language confusion. We find that language confusion can be partially mitigated via few-shot prompting, multilingual SFT and preference tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T17:03:51Z)
• Shortcomings of LLMs for Low-Resource Translation: Retrieval and Understanding are Both the Problem [4.830018386227]
  This work investigates the in-context learning abilities of pretrained large language models (LLMs) when instructed to translate text from a low-resource language into a high-resource language as part of an automated machine translation pipeline. We conduct a set of experiments translating Southern Quechua to Spanish and examine the informativity of various types of context retrieved from a constrained database of digitized pedagogical materials and parallel corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T20:02:22Z)
• What Languages are Easy to Language-Model? A Perspective from Learning Probabilistic Regular Languages [78.1866280652834]
  Large language models (LM) are distributions over strings. We investigate the learnability of regular LMs (RLMs) by RNN and Transformer LMs. We find that the complexity of the RLM rank is strong and significant predictors of learnability for both RNNs and Transformers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:34:24Z)
• Holmes: A Benchmark to Assess the Linguistic Competence of Language Models [59.627729608055006]
  We introduce Holmes, a new benchmark designed to assess language models (LMs) linguistic competence. We use computation-based probing to examine LMs' internal representations regarding distinct linguistic phenomena. As a result, we meet recent calls to disentangle LMs' linguistic competence from other cognitive abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T17:58:36Z)
• A systematic investigation of learnability from single child linguistic input [12.279543223376935]
  Language models (LMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in generating linguistically coherent text. However, a significant gap exists between the training data for these models and the linguistic input a child receives. Our research focuses on training LMs on subsets of a single child's linguistic input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:58:58Z)
• Language Model Pre-Training with Sparse Latent Typing [66.75786739499604]
  We propose a new pre-training objective, Sparse Latent Typing, which enables the model to sparsely extract sentence-level keywords with diverse latent types. Experimental results show that our model is able to learn interpretable latent type categories in a self-supervised manner without using any external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T00:37:08Z)
• Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
  Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict. This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data. Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.