Evaluating Neural Language Models as Cognitive Models of Language
Acquisition
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.20093v1
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:16:17 GMT
- Title: Evaluating Neural Language Models as Cognitive Models of Language
Acquisition
- Authors: H\'ector Javier V\'azquez Mart\'inez, Annika Lea Heuser, Charles Yang,
Jordan Kodner
- Abstract summary: We argue that some of the most prominent benchmarks for evaluating the syntactic capacities of neural language models may not be sufficiently rigorous.
When trained on small-scale data modeling child language acquisition, the LMs can be readily matched by simple baseline models.
We conclude with suggestions for better connecting LMs with the empirical study of child language acquisition.
- Score: 4.779196219827507
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The success of neural language models (LMs) on many technological tasks has
brought about their potential relevance as scientific theories of language
despite some clear differences between LM training and child language
acquisition. In this paper we argue that some of the most prominent benchmarks
for evaluating the syntactic capacities of LMs may not be sufficiently
rigorous. In particular, we show that the template-based benchmarks lack the
structural diversity commonly found in the theoretical and psychological
studies of language. When trained on small-scale data modeling child language
acquisition, the LMs can be readily matched by simple baseline models. We
advocate for the use of the readily available, carefully curated datasets that
have been evaluated for gradient acceptability by large pools of native
speakers and are designed to probe the structural basis of grammar
specifically. On one such dataset, the LI-Adger dataset, LMs evaluate sentences
in a way inconsistent with human language users. We conclude with suggestions
for better connecting LMs with the empirical study of child language
acquisition.
Related papers
- Can Language Models Learn Typologically Implausible Languages? [62.823015163987996]
Grammatical features across human languages show intriguing correlations often attributed to learning biases in humans.
We discuss how language models (LMs) allow us to better determine the role of domain-general learning biases in language universals.
We test LMs on an array of highly naturalistic but counterfactual versions of the English (head-initial) and Japanese (head-final) languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T20:40:01Z) - Assessing Language Comprehension in Large Language Models Using Construction Grammar [3.0906699069248806]
Construction Grammar (CxG) provides insights into the meaning captured by linguistic elements known as constructions (Cxns)
These datasets are carefully constructed to include examples which are unlikely to appear in pre-training data, yet intuitive and easy for humans to understand.
Our experiments focus on downstream natural language inference and reasoning tasks by comparing LLMs' understanding of the underlying meanings communicated through 8 unique Cxns with that of humans.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-08T18:15:10Z) - Randomly Sampled Language Reasoning Problems Reveal Limits of LLMs [8.146860674148044]
We attempt to measure models' language understanding capacity while circumventing the risk of dataset recall.
We parameterize large families of language tasks recognized by deterministic finite automata (DFAs)
We find that, even in the strikingly simple setting of 3-state DFAs, LLMs underperform un parameterized ngram models on both language recognition and synthesis tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-06T07:57:51Z) - From Babbling to Fluency: Evaluating the Evolution of Language Models in Terms of Human Language Acquisition [6.617999710257379]
We propose a three-stage framework to assess the abilities of LMs.
We evaluate the generative capacities of LMs using methods from linguistic research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T06:31:49Z) - Small Language Models Also Work With Small Vocabularies: Probing the Linguistic Abilities of Grapheme- and Phoneme-Based Baby Llamas [7.585433383340306]
We show that tokenization-free, phoneme- and grapheme-based language models can achieve strong linguistic performance.
Our findings suggest a promising direction for creating more linguistically plausible language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T12:36:08Z) - Boosting the Capabilities of Compact Models in Low-Data Contexts with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation [2.9921619703037274]
We propose a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) framework backed by a large language model (LLM) to correct the output of a smaller model for the linguistic task of morphological glossing.
We leverage linguistic information to make up for the lack of data and trainable parameters, while allowing for inputs from written descriptive grammars interpreted and distilled through an LLM.
We show that a compact, RAG-supported model is highly effective in data-scarce settings, achieving a new state-of-the-art for this task and our target languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T04:20:14Z) - Language Representations Can be What Recommenders Need: Findings and Potentials [57.90679739598295]
We show that item representations, when linearly mapped from advanced LM representations, yield superior recommendation performance.
This outcome suggests the possible homomorphism between the advanced language representation space and an effective item representation space for recommendation.
Our findings highlight the connection between language modeling and behavior modeling, which can inspire both natural language processing and recommender system communities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-07T17:05:24Z) - What Languages are Easy to Language-Model? A Perspective from Learning Probabilistic Regular Languages [78.1866280652834]
Large language models (LM) are distributions over strings.
We investigate the learnability of regular LMs (RLMs) by RNN and Transformer LMs.
We find that the complexity of the RLM rank is strong and significant predictors of learnability for both RNNs and Transformers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T17:34:24Z) - Holmes: A Benchmark to Assess the Linguistic Competence of Language Models [59.627729608055006]
We introduce Holmes, a new benchmark designed to assess language models (LMs) linguistic competence.
We use computation-based probing to examine LMs' internal representations regarding distinct linguistic phenomena.
As a result, we meet recent calls to disentangle LMs' linguistic competence from other cognitive abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T17:58:36Z) - Language Model Pre-Training with Sparse Latent Typing [66.75786739499604]
We propose a new pre-training objective, Sparse Latent Typing, which enables the model to sparsely extract sentence-level keywords with diverse latent types.
Experimental results show that our model is able to learn interpretable latent type categories in a self-supervised manner without using any external knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-23T00:37:08Z) - Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for
Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict.
This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data.
Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.