Morphology Matters: A Multilingual Language Modeling Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06262v1
• Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:55:55 GMT
• Title: Morphology Matters: A Multilingual Language Modeling Analysis
• Authors: Hyunji Hayley Park, Katherine J. Zhang, Coleman Haley, Kenneth Steimel, Han Liu, Lane Schwartz
• Abstract summary: Prior studies disagree on whether inflectional morphology makes languages harder to model. We compile a larger corpus of 145 Bible translations in 92 languages and a larger number of typological features. Several morphological measures are significantly associated with higher surprisal when LSTM models are trained with BPE-segmented data.
• Score: 8.791030561752384
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Prior studies in multilingual language modeling (e.g., Cotterell et al., 2018; Mielke et al., 2019) disagree on whether or not inflectional morphology makes languages harder to model. We attempt to resolve the disagreement and extend those studies. We compile a larger corpus of 145 Bible translations in 92 languages and a larger number of typological features. We fill in missing typological data for several languages and consider corpus-based measures of morphological complexity in addition to expert-produced typological features. We find that several morphological measures are significantly associated with higher surprisal when LSTM models are trained with BPE-segmented data. We also investigate linguistically-motivated subword segmentation strategies like Morfessor and Finite-State Transducers (FSTs) and find that these segmentation strategies yield better performance and reduce the impact of a language's morphology on language modeling.

Related papers

• Morphological Typology in BPE Subword Productivity and Language Modeling [0.0]
  We focus on languages with synthetic and analytical morphological structures and examine their productivity when tokenized. Experiments reveal that languages with synthetic features exhibit greater subword regularity and productivity with BPE tokenization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T06:13:29Z)
• UzMorphAnalyser: A Morphological Analysis Model for the Uzbek Language Using Inflectional Endings [0.0]
  Affixes play an important role in the morphological analysis of words, by adding additional meanings and grammatical functions to words. This paper present modeling of the morphological analysis of Uzbek words, including stemming, lemmatizing, and the extraction of morphological information. The developed tool based on the proposed model is available as a web-based application and an open-source Python library.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T05:06:55Z)
• Holmes: A Benchmark to Assess the Linguistic Competence of Language Models [59.627729608055006]
  We introduce Holmes, a new benchmark designed to assess language models (LMs) linguistic competence. We use computation-based probing to examine LMs' internal representations regarding distinct linguistic phenomena. As a result, we meet recent calls to disentangle LMs' linguistic competence from other cognitive abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T17:58:36Z)
• Explicit Morphological Knowledge Improves Pre-training of Language Models for Hebrew [19.4968960182412]
  We investigate the hypothesis that incorporating explicit morphological knowledge in the pre-training phase can improve the performance of PLMs for morphologically rich languages. We propose various morphologically driven tokenization methods enabling the model to leverage morphological cues beyond raw text. Our experiments show that morphologically driven tokenization demonstrates improved results compared to a standard language-agnostic tokenization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T17:02:49Z)
• UniMorph 4.0: Universal Morphology [104.69846084893298]
  This paper presents the expansions and improvements made on several fronts over the last couple of years. Collaborative efforts by numerous linguists have added 67 new languages, including 30 endangered languages. In light of the last UniMorph release, we also augmented the database with morpheme segmentation for 16 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-07T09:19:02Z)
• Same Neurons, Different Languages: Probing Morphosyntax in Multilingual Pre-trained Models [84.86942006830772]
  We conjecture that multilingual pre-trained models can derive language-universal abstractions about grammar. We conduct the first large-scale empirical study over 43 languages and 14 morphosyntactic categories with a state-of-the-art neuron-level probe.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-04T12:22:31Z)
• A Massively Multilingual Analysis of Cross-linguality in Shared Embedding Space [61.18554842370824]
  In cross-lingual language models, representations for many different languages live in the same space. We compute a task-based measure of cross-lingual alignment in the form of bitext retrieval performance. We examine a range of linguistic, quasi-linguistic, and training-related features as potential predictors of these alignment metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-13T21:05:37Z)
• How Suitable Are Subword Segmentation Strategies for Translating Non-Concatenative Morphology? [26.71325671956197]
  We design a test suite to evaluate segmentation strategies on different types of morphological phenomena. We find that learning to analyse and generate morphologically complex surface representations is still challenging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T17:23:21Z)
• Linguistic Typology Features from Text: Inferring the Sparse Features of World Atlas of Language Structures [73.06435180872293]
  We construct a recurrent neural network predictor based on byte embeddings and convolutional layers. We show that some features from various linguistic types can be predicted reliably.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T21:00:53Z)
• Evaluating Transformer-Based Multilingual Text Classification [55.53547556060537]
  We argue that NLP tools perform unequally across languages with different syntactic and morphological structures. We calculate word order and morphological similarity indices to aid our empirical study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T03:34:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.