TARA: Training and Representation Alteration for AI Fairness and Domain Generalization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06387v2
• Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:40:51 GMT
• Title: TARA: Training and Representation Alteration for AI Fairness and Domain Generalization
• Authors: William Paul, Armin Hadzic, Neil Joshi, Fady Alajaji, Phil Burlina
• Abstract summary: This method uses a dual strategy performing training and representation alteration (TARA) for the mitigation of prominent causes of AI bias. When testing our methods on image analytics, experiments demonstrate that TARA significantly or fully debiases baseline models. recognizing certain limitations in current metrics used for assessing debiasing performance, we propose novel conjunctive debiasing metrics.
• Score: 6.6147550436077776
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This method uses a dual strategy performing training and representation alteration (TARA) for the mitigation of prominent causes of AI bias by including: a) the use of representation learning alteration via adversarial independence to suppress the bias-inducing dependence of the data representation from protected factors; and b) training set alteration via intelligent augmentation to address bias-causing data imbalance, by using generative models that allow the fine control of sensitive factors related to underrepresented populations. When testing our methods on image analytics, experiments demonstrate that TARA significantly or fully debiases baseline models while outperforming competing debiasing methods, e.g., with (% overall accuracy, % accuracy gap) = (78.75, 0.5) vs. the baseline method's score of (71.75, 10.5) for EyePACS, and (73.71, 11.82) vs. (69.08, 21.65) for CelebA. Furthermore, recognizing certain limitations in current metrics used for assessing debiasing performance, we propose novel conjunctive debiasing metrics. Our experiments also demonstrate the ability of these novel metrics in assessing the Pareto efficiency of the proposed methods.

Related papers

• Enhancing Training Data Attribution for Large Language Models with Fitting Error Consideration [74.09687562334682]
  We introduce a novel training data attribution method called Debias and Denoise Attribution (DDA) Our method significantly outperforms existing approaches, achieving an averaged AUC of 91.64%. DDA exhibits strong generality and scalability across various sources and different-scale models like LLaMA2, QWEN2, and Mistral.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T07:14:26Z)
• Utilizing Adversarial Examples for Bias Mitigation and Accuracy Enhancement [3.0820287240219795]
  We propose a novel approach to mitigate biases in computer vision models by utilizing counterfactual generation and fine-tuning. Our approach leverages a curriculum learning framework combined with a fine-grained adversarial loss to fine-tune the model using adversarial examples. We validate our approach through both qualitative and quantitative assessments, demonstrating improved bias mitigation and accuracy compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T00:41:32Z)
• Addressing Both Statistical and Causal Gender Fairness in NLP Models [22.75594773147521]
  Statistical fairness stipulates equivalent outcomes for every protected group, whereas causal fairness prescribes that a model makes the same prediction for an individual regardless of their protected characteristics. We demonstrate that combinations of statistical and causal debiasing techniques are able to reduce bias measured through both types of metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-30T20:05:41Z)
• Toward Fair Facial Expression Recognition with Improved Distribution Alignment [19.442685015494316]
  We present a novel approach to mitigate bias in facial expression recognition (FER) models. Our method aims to reduce sensitive attribute information such as gender, age, or race, in the embeddings produced by FER models. For the first time, we analyze the notion of attractiveness as an important sensitive attribute in FER models and demonstrate that FER models can indeed exhibit biases towards more attractive faces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-11T14:59:20Z)
• Delving into Identify-Emphasize Paradigm for Combating Unknown Bias [52.76758938921129]
  We propose an effective bias-conflicting scoring method (ECS) to boost the identification accuracy. We also propose gradient alignment (GA) to balance the contributions of the mined bias-aligned and bias-conflicting samples. Experiments are conducted on multiple datasets in various settings, demonstrating that the proposed solution can mitigate the impact of unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:50:24Z)
• Diffusion Denoising Process for Perceptron Bias in Out-of-distribution Detection [67.49587673594276]
  We introduce a new perceptron bias assumption that suggests discriminator models are more sensitive to certain features of the input, leading to the overconfidence problem. We demonstrate that the diffusion denoising process (DDP) of DMs serves as a novel form of asymmetric, which is well-suited to enhance the input and mitigate the overconfidence problem. Our experiments on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and ImageNet show that our method outperforms SOTA approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T08:45:08Z)
• D-BIAS: A Causality-Based Human-in-the-Loop System for Tackling Algorithmic Bias [57.87117733071416]
  We propose D-BIAS, a visual interactive tool that embodies human-in-the-loop AI approach for auditing and mitigating social biases. A user can detect the presence of bias against a group by identifying unfair causal relationships in the causal network. For each interaction, say weakening/deleting a biased causal edge, the system uses a novel method to simulate a new (debiased) dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-10T03:41:48Z)
• Information-Theoretic Bias Reduction via Causal View of Spurious Correlation [71.9123886505321]
  We propose an information-theoretic bias measurement technique through a causal interpretation of spurious correlation. We present a novel debiasing framework against the algorithmic bias, which incorporates a bias regularization loss. The proposed bias measurement and debiasing approaches are validated in diverse realistic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T01:19:31Z)
• Information-Theoretic Bias Assessment Of Learned Representations Of Pretrained Face Recognition [18.07966649678408]
  We propose an information-theoretic, independent bias assessment metric to identify degree of bias against protected demographic attributes. Our metric differs from other methods that rely on classification accuracy or examine the differences between ground truth and predicted labels of protected attributes predicted using a shallow network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-08T17:41:17Z)
• Learning Bias-Invariant Representation by Cross-Sample Mutual Information Minimization [77.8735802150511]
  We propose a cross-sample adversarial debiasing (CSAD) method to remove the bias information misused by the target task. The correlation measurement plays a critical role in adversarial debiasing and is conducted by a cross-sample neural mutual information estimator. We conduct thorough experiments on publicly available datasets to validate the advantages of the proposed method over state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-11T21:17:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.