The COVID-19 Infodemic: Twitter versus Facebook

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.09353v2
• Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 00:22:38 GMT
• Title: The COVID-19 Infodemic: Twitter versus Facebook
• Authors: Kai-Cheng Yang, Francesco Pierri, Pik-Mai Hui, David Axelrod, Christopher Torres-Lugo, John Bryden, Filippo Menczer
• Abstract summary: We analyze the prevalence and diffusion of links to low-credibility content on Twitter and Facebook. A minority of accounts and pages exert a strong influence on each platform. The overt nature of this manipulation points to the need for societal-level solutions.
• Score: 5.135597127873748
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The global spread of the novel coronavirus is affected by the spread of related misinformation -- the so-called COVID-19 Infodemic -- that makes populations more vulnerable to the disease through resistance to mitigation efforts. Here we analyze the prevalence and diffusion of links to low-credibility content about the pandemic across two major social media platforms, Twitter and Facebook. We characterize cross-platform similarities and differences in popular sources, diffusion patterns, influencers, coordination, and automation. Comparing the two platforms, we find divergence among the prevalence of popular low-credibility sources and suspicious videos. A minority of accounts and pages exert a strong influence on each platform. These misinformation "superspreaders" are often associated with the low-credibility sources and tend to be verified by the platforms. On both platforms, there is evidence of coordinated sharing of Infodemic content. The overt nature of this manipulation points to the need for societal-level solutions in addition to mitigation strategies within the platforms. However, we highlight limits imposed by inconsistent data-access policies on our capability to study harmful manipulations of information ecosystems.

Related papers

• Carthago Delenda Est: Co-opetitive Indirect Information Diffusion Model for Influence Operations on Online Social Media [6.236019068888737]
  We introduce Diluvsion, an agent-based model for contested information propagation efforts on Twitter-like social media. We account for engagement metrics in influencing stance adoption, non-social tie spreading of information, neutrality as a stance that can be spread, and themes that are analogous to media's framing effect and are symbiotic with respect to stance propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T21:15:24Z)
• News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: A Longitudinal Cross-Country Perspective [49.1574468325115]
  This study investigated information consumption in four European countries. It analyzed three years of Twitter activity from news outlet accounts in France, Germany, Italy, and the UK. Results indicate that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, although unreliable content is still present across all countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T16:22:10Z)
• Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Campaign on Facebook using Minimal Supervision [28.14874371042193]
  In the age of social media, where billions of internet users share information and opinions, the negative impact of pandemics is not limited to the physical world. This global infodemic jeopardizes measures to control the pandemic by creating panic, vaccine hesitancy, and fragmented social response. Platforms like Facebook allow advertisers to adapt their messaging to target different demographics and help alleviate or exacerbate the infodemic problem depending on their content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T17:54:06Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Characterizing User Susceptibility to COVID-19 Misinformation on Twitter [40.0762273487125]
  This study attempts to answer it who constitutes the population vulnerable to the online misinformation in the pandemic. We distinguish different types of users, ranging from social bots to humans with various level of engagement with COVID-related misinformation. We then identify users' online features and situational predictors that correlate with their susceptibility to COVID-19 misinformation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-20T13:31:15Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)
• Characterizing information leaders in Twitter during COVID-19 Pandemic [0.0]
  Infodemic of misinformation is an important secondary crisis associated to the pandemic. We propose a framework to characterize leaders in Twitter based on the analysis of the social graph derived from the activity in this social network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-14T21:14:15Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
• A multi-layer approach to disinformation detection on Twitter [4.663548775064491]
  We employ a multi-layer representation of Twitter diffusion networks, and we compute for each layer a set of global network features. Experimental results with two large-scale datasets, corresponding to diffusion cascades of news shared respectively in the United States and Italy, show that a simple Logistic Regression model is able to classify disinformation vs mainstream networks with high accuracy. We believe that our network-based approach provides useful insights which pave the way to the future development of a system to detect misleading and harmful information spreading on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-28T09:25:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.