Abusive Advertising: Scrutinizing socially relevant algorithms in a black box analysis to examine their impact on vulnerable patient groups in the health sector

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.02018v1
• Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 19:28:19 GMT
• Title: Abusive Advertising: Scrutinizing socially relevant algorithms in a black box analysis to examine their impact on vulnerable patient groups in the health sector
• Authors: Martin Reber
• Abstract summary: This thesis examines the display of advertisements of unapproved stem cell treatments for Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Diabetes on Google's results page. Google announced a policy change in September 2019 that was meant to prohibit and ban the practices in question. A browser extension for Firefox and Chrome was developed and distributed to conduct a crowdsourced Black Box analysis.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The targeted direct-to-customer marketing of unapproved stem cell treatments by a questionable online industry is directed at vulnerable users who search the Internet in the hope of a cure. This behavior especially poses a threat to individuals who find themselves in hopeless and desperate phases in their lives. They might show low reluctance to try therapies that solely promise a cure but are not scientifically proven to do so. In the worst case, they suffer serious side-effects. Therefore, this thesis examines the display of advertisements of unapproved stem cell treatments for Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Diabetes on Google's results page. The company announced a policy change in September 2019 that was meant to prohibit and ban the practices in question. However, there was evidence that those ads were still being delivered. A browser extension for Firefox and Chrome was developed and distributed to conduct a crowdsourced Black Box analysis. It was delivered to volunteers and virtual machines in Australia, Canada, the USA and the UK. Data on search results, advertisements and top stories was collected and analyzed. The results showed that there still is questionable advertising even though Google announced to purge it from its platform.

Related papers

• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• Rebooting Internet Immunity [0.0]
  Article proposes refining online immunity by limiting it to claims that threaten to impose a content-moderation burden on internet defendants. Internet also operates as a platform for the delivery of real-world goods and services. This approach empowers courts to identify culpable actors in the virtual world and treat like conduct alike wherever it occurs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T13:47:47Z)
• Semantic Similarity Models for Depression Severity Estimation [53.72188878602294]
  This paper presents an efficient semantic pipeline to study depression severity in individuals based on their social media writings. We use test user sentences for producing semantic rankings over an index of representative training sentences corresponding to depressive symptoms and severity levels. We evaluate our methods on two Reddit-based benchmarks, achieving 30% improvement over state of the art in terms of measuring depression severity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T18:47:26Z)
• Multilingual Disinformation Detection for Digital Advertising [0.9684919127633844]
  We make the first step towards quickly detecting and red-flaging websites that potentially manipulate the public with disinformation. We build a machine learning model based on multilingual text embeddings that first determines whether the page mentions a topic of interest, then estimates the likelihood of the content being malicious. Our system empowers internal teams to proactively blacklist unsafe content, thus protecting the reputation of the advertisement provider.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T10:29:20Z)
• Health Advertising on Facebook: Privacy & Policy Considerations [0.0]
  Cross site tracking is used to extract health information from users without permission. We examine how browsing data can be exchanged between digital medicine companies and Facebook for advertising and lead generation purposes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T19:06:33Z)
• Sentiment Analysis of Microblogging dataset on Coronavirus Pandemic [0.8252679746749371]
  Coronavirus (COVID-19) is a contagious illness caused by the coronavirus 2 that causes severe respiratory symptoms. In this paper, we have analyzed the Twitter dataset for evaluating the sentiment using several machine learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-17T18:13:54Z)
• Analyzing the "Sleeping Giants" Activism Model in Brazil [1.549278866004654]
  Sleeping Giants Brasil (SGB) campaigned against media outlets using Twitter to ask companies to remove ads from the targeted outlets. This work presents a thorough quantitative characterization of this activism model, analyzing the three campaigns carried out by SGB between May and September 2020.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-16T21:47:30Z)
• Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads [70.02478301291264]
  We develop a new methodology for black-box auditing of algorithms for discrimination in the delivery of job advertisements. Our first contribution is to identify the distinction between skew in ad delivery due to protected categories such as gender or race. Second, we develop an auditing methodology that distinguishes between skew explainable by differences in qualifications from other factors. Third, we apply our proposed methodology to two prominent targeted advertising platforms for job ads: Facebook and LinkedIn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T17:38:36Z)
• Dark Web Marketplaces and COVID-19: before the vaccine [53.447910186085586]
  We analyse 851,199 listings extracted from 30 dark web marketplaces between January 1, 2020 and November 16, 2020. We identify 788 listings directly related to COVID-19 products and monitor the temporal evolution of product categories. We reveal how the online shadow economy has evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight the importance of a continuous monitoring of DWMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T14:27:41Z)
• Do Interruptions Pay Off? Effects of Interruptive Ads on Consumers Willingness to Pay [79.9312329825761]
  We present the results of a study designed to measure the impact of interruptive advertising on consumers willingness to pay for products bearing the advertiser's brand. Our results contribute to the research on the economic impact of advertising, and introduce a method of measuring actual (as opposed to self-reported) willingness to pay in experimental marketing research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-14T09:26:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.