Customer Price Sensitivities in Competitive Automobile Insurance Markets
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08551v1
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:07:20 GMT
- Title: Customer Price Sensitivities in Competitive Automobile Insurance Markets
- Authors: Robert Matthijs Verschuren
- Abstract summary: Insurers are increasingly adopting more demand-based strategies to incorporate the indirect effect of premium changes on policyholders' willingness to stay.
We consider a causal inference approach in this paper to account for customer price sensitivities and to deduce optimal, multi-period profit maximizing premium renewal offers.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Insurers are increasingly adopting more demand-based strategies to
incorporate the indirect effect of premium changes on their policyholders'
willingness to stay. However, since in practice both insurers' renewal premia
and customers' responses to these premia typically depend on the customer's
level of risk, it remains challenging in these strategies to determine how to
properly control for this confounding. We therefore consider a causal inference
approach in this paper to account for customer price sensitivities and to
deduce optimal, multi-period profit maximizing premium renewal offers. More
specifically, we extend the discrete treatment framework of Guelman and
Guill\'en (2014) by Extreme Gradient Boosting, or XGBoost, and by multiple
imputation to better account for the uncertainty in the counterfactual
responses. We additionally introduce the continuous treatment framework with
XGBoost to the insurance literature to allow identification of the exact
optimal renewal offers and account for any competition in the market by
including competitor offers. The application of the two treatment frameworks to
a Dutch automobile insurance portfolio suggests that a policy's competitiveness
in the market is crucial for a customer's price sensitivity and that XGBoost is
more appropriate to describe this than the traditional logistic regression.
Moreover, an efficient frontier of both frameworks indicates that substantially
more profit can be gained on the portfolio than realized, also already with
less churn and in particular if we allow for continuous rate changes. A
multi-period renewal optimization confirms these findings and demonstrates that
the competitiveness enables temporal feedback of previous rate changes on
future demand.
Related papers
- Segment Discovery: Enhancing E-commerce Targeting [8.000199536112937]
This paper proposes a policy framework based on uplift modeling and constrained optimization.
We demonstrate improvement over state-of-the-art targeting approaches using two large-scale experimental studies and a production implementation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-20T18:42:04Z) - OptiGrad: A Fair and more Efficient Price Elasticity Optimization via a Gradient Based Learning [7.145413681946911]
This paper presents a novel approach to optimizing profit margins in non-life insurance markets through a gradient descent-based method.
It targets three key objectives: 1) maximizing profit margins, 2) ensuring conversion rates, and 3) enforcing fairness criteria such as demographic parity (DP)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-16T04:21:59Z) - Incentivized Truthful Communication for Federated Bandits [61.759855777522255]
We propose an incentive compatible (i.e., truthful) communication protocol, named Truth-FedBan.
We show that Truth-FedBan still guarantees the sub-linear regret and communication cost without any overheads.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-07T00:23:20Z) - Measuring and Mitigating Biases in Motor Insurance Pricing [1.2289361708127877]
The non-life insurance sector operates within a highly competitive and tightly regulated framework.
Age-based premium fairness is also mandated in certain insurance domains.
In certain insurance domains, variables such as the presence of serious illnesses or disabilities are emerging as new dimensions for evaluating fairness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-20T16:34:48Z) - Insurance pricing on price comparison websites via reinforcement
learning [7.023335262537794]
This paper introduces reinforcement learning framework that learns optimal pricing policy by integrating model-based and model-free methods.
The paper also highlights the importance of evaluating pricing policies using an offline dataset in a consistent fashion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-14T04:44:56Z) - Structured Dynamic Pricing: Optimal Regret in a Global Shrinkage Model [50.06663781566795]
We consider a dynamic model with the consumers' preferences as well as price sensitivity varying over time.
We measure the performance of a dynamic pricing policy via regret, which is the expected revenue loss compared to a clairvoyant that knows the sequence of model parameters in advance.
Our regret analysis results not only demonstrate optimality of the proposed policy but also show that for policy planning it is essential to incorporate available structural information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T00:23:23Z) - Influencing Long-Term Behavior in Multiagent Reinforcement Learning [59.98329270954098]
We propose a principled framework for considering the limiting policies of other agents as the time approaches infinity.
Specifically, we develop a new optimization objective that maximizes each agent's average reward by directly accounting for the impact of its behavior on the limiting set of policies that other agents will take on.
Thanks to our farsighted evaluation, we demonstrate better long-term performance than state-of-the-art baselines in various domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-07T17:32:35Z) - Online Learning with Knapsacks: the Best of Both Worlds [54.28273783164608]
We casting online learning problems in which a decision maker wants to maximize their expected reward without violating a finite set of $m$m resource constraints.
Our framework allows the decision maker to handle its evidence flexibility and costoretic functions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-28T12:10:48Z) - Conditional Expectation based Value Decomposition for Scalable On-Demand
Ride Pooling [11.988825533369683]
Traditional ride pooling approaches do not consider the impact of current matches on future value for vehicles/drivers.
We show that our new approach, Conditional Expectation based Value Decomposition (CEVD) outperforms NeurADP by up to 9.76% in terms of overall requests served.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-01T15:53:16Z) - Post-Contextual-Bandit Inference [57.88785630755165]
Contextual bandit algorithms are increasingly replacing non-adaptive A/B tests in e-commerce, healthcare, and policymaking.
They can both improve outcomes for study participants and increase the chance of identifying good or even best policies.
To support credible inference on novel interventions at the end of the study, we still want to construct valid confidence intervals on average treatment effects, subgroup effects, or value of new policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-01T12:01:51Z) - VCG Mechanism Design with Unknown Agent Values under Stochastic Bandit
Feedback [104.06766271716774]
We study a multi-round welfare-maximising mechanism design problem in instances where agents do not know their values.
We first define three notions of regret for the welfare, the individual utilities of each agent and that of the mechanism.
Our framework also provides flexibility to control the pricing scheme so as to trade-off between the agent and seller regrets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-19T18:00:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.