A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Deep Model Robustness

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.09617v1
• Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 01:04:25 GMT
• Title: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Deep Model Robustness
• Authors: Aishan Liu, Xianglong Liu, Jun Guo, Jiakai Wang, Yuqing Ma, Ze Zhao, Xinghai Gao, Gang Xiao
• Abstract summary: Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable performance across a wide area of applications. They are vulnerable to adversarial examples, which motivates the adversarial defense. This paper presents a model evaluation framework containing a comprehensive, rigorous, and coherent set of evaluation metrics.
• Score: 44.20580847861682
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable performance across a wide area of applications. However, they are vulnerable to adversarial examples, which motivates the adversarial defense. By adopting simple evaluation metrics, most of the current defenses only conduct incomplete evaluations, which are far from providing comprehensive understandings of the limitations of these defenses. Thus, most proposed defenses are quickly shown to be attacked successfully, which result in the "arm race" phenomenon between attack and defense. To mitigate this problem, we establish a model robustness evaluation framework containing a comprehensive, rigorous, and coherent set of evaluation metrics, which could fully evaluate model robustness and provide deep insights into building robust models. With 23 evaluation metrics in total, our framework primarily focuses on the two key factors of adversarial learning (\ie, data and model). Through neuron coverage and data imperceptibility, we use data-oriented metrics to measure the integrity of test examples; by delving into model structure and behavior, we exploit model-oriented metrics to further evaluate robustness in the adversarial setting. To fully demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, we conduct large-scale experiments on multiple datasets including CIFAR-10 and SVHN using different models and defenses with our open-source platform AISafety. Overall, our paper aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation framework which could demonstrate detailed inspections of the model robustness, and we hope that our paper can inspire further improvement to the model robustness.

Related papers

• Towards Million-Scale Adversarial Robustness Evaluation With Stronger Individual Attacks [26.422616504640786]
  We propose a novel individual attack method, Probability Margin Attack (PMA), which defines the adversarial margin in the probability space rather than the logits space. We create a million-scale dataset, CC1M, and use it to conduct the first million-scale adversarial robustness evaluation of adversarially-trained ImageNet models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T10:41:23Z)
• MIBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Model Inversion Attack and Defense [43.71365087852274]
  Model Inversion (MI) attacks aim at leveraging the output information of target models to reconstruct privacy-sensitive training data. The lack of a comprehensive, aligned, and reliable benchmark has emerged as a formidable challenge. We introduce the first practical benchmark for model inversion attacks and defenses to address this critical gap, which is named textitMIBench
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T16:13:49Z)
• StructEval: Deepen and Broaden Large Language Model Assessment via Structured Evaluation [46.59416831869014]
  We propose a novel evaluation framework referred to as StructEval. Starting from an atomic test objective, StructEval deepens and broadens the evaluation by conducting a structured assessment across multiple cognitive levels and critical concepts. Experiments on three widely-used benchmarks demonstrate that StructEval serves as a reliable tool for resisting the risk of data contamination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T16:28:30Z)
• Constrained Adaptive Attacks: Realistic Evaluation of Adversarial Examples and Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks for Tabular Data [19.579837693614326]
  We propose CAA, the first efficient evasion attack for constrained deep learning models. We leverage CAA to build a benchmark of deep tabular models across three popular use cases: credit scoring, phishing and botnet attacks detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T07:35:28Z)
• From Adversarial Arms Race to Model-centric Evaluation: Motivating a Unified Automatic Robustness Evaluation Framework [91.94389491920309]
  Textual adversarial attacks can discover models' weaknesses by adding semantic-preserved but misleading perturbations to the inputs. The existing practice of robustness evaluation may exhibit issues of incomprehensive evaluation, impractical evaluation protocol, and invalid adversarial samples. We set up a unified automatic robustness evaluation framework, shifting towards model-centric evaluation to exploit the advantages of adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T14:55:20Z)
• GREAT Score: Global Robustness Evaluation of Adversarial Perturbation using Generative Models [60.48306899271866]
  We present a new framework, called GREAT Score, for global robustness evaluation of adversarial perturbation using generative models. We show high correlation and significantly reduced cost of GREAT Score when compared to the attack-based model ranking on RobustBench. GREAT Score can be used for remote auditing of privacy-sensitive black-box models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T14:58:27Z)
• A Unified Evaluation of Textual Backdoor Learning: Frameworks and Benchmarks [72.7373468905418]
  We develop an open-source toolkit OpenBackdoor to foster the implementations and evaluations of textual backdoor learning. We also propose CUBE, a simple yet strong clustering-based defense baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T02:29:23Z)
• Model-Agnostic Meta-Attack: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Adversarial Robustness [53.094682754683255]
  We propose a Model-Agnostic Meta-Attack (MAMA) approach to discover stronger attack algorithms automatically. Our method learns the in adversarial attacks parameterized by a recurrent neural network. We develop a model-agnostic training algorithm to improve the ability of the learned when attacking unseen defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T13:54:24Z)
• RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmark [84.50044645539305]
  Key challenge in benchmarking robustness is that its evaluation is often error-prone leading to robustness overestimation. We evaluate adversarial robustness with AutoAttack, an ensemble of white- and black-box attacks. We analyze the impact of robustness on the performance on distribution shifts, calibration, out-of-distribution detection, fairness, privacy leakage, smoothness, and transferability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T17:06:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.