Does injecting linguistic structure into language models lead to better alignment with brain recordings?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.12608v1
• Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:42:02 GMT
• Title: Does injecting linguistic structure into language models lead to better alignment with brain recordings?
• Authors: Mostafa Abdou, Ana Valeria Gonzalez, Mariya Toneva, Daniel Hershcovich, Anders S{\o}gaard
• Abstract summary: We evaluate whether language models align better with brain recordings if their attention is biased by annotations from syntactic or semantic formalisms. Our proposed approach enables the evaluation of more targeted hypotheses about the composition of meaning in the brain.
• Score: 13.880819301385854
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Neuroscientists evaluate deep neural networks for natural language processing as possible candidate models for how language is processed in the brain. These models are often trained without explicit linguistic supervision, but have been shown to learn some linguistic structure in the absence of such supervision (Manning et al., 2020), potentially questioning the relevance of symbolic linguistic theories in modeling such cognitive processes (Warstadt and Bowman, 2020). We evaluate across two fMRI datasets whether language models align better with brain recordings, if their attention is biased by annotations from syntactic or semantic formalisms. Using structure from dependency or minimal recursion semantic annotations, we find alignments improve significantly for one of the datasets. For another dataset, we see more mixed results. We present an extensive analysis of these results. Our proposed approach enables the evaluation of more targeted hypotheses about the composition of meaning in the brain, expanding the range of possible scientific inferences a neuroscientist could make, and opens up new opportunities for cross-pollination between computational neuroscience and linguistics.

Related papers

• Analysis of Argument Structure Constructions in a Deep Recurrent Language Model [0.0]
  We explore the representation and processing of Argument Structure Constructions (ASCs) in a recurrent neural language model. Our results show that sentence representations form distinct clusters corresponding to the four ASCs across all hidden layers. This indicates that even a relatively simple, brain-constrained recurrent neural network can effectively differentiate between various construction types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T09:27:41Z)
• Brain-Like Language Processing via a Shallow Untrained Multihead Attention Network [16.317199232071232]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to be effective models of the human language system. In this work, we investigate the key architectural components driving the surprising alignment of untrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T12:54:03Z)
• Language Generation from Brain Recordings [68.97414452707103]
  We propose a generative language BCI that utilizes the capacity of a large language model and a semantic brain decoder. The proposed model can generate coherent language sequences aligned with the semantic content of visual or auditory language stimuli. Our findings demonstrate the potential and feasibility of employing BCIs in direct language generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T13:37:21Z)
• Information-Restricted Neural Language Models Reveal Different Brain Regions' Sensitivity to Semantics, Syntax and Context [87.31930367845125]
  We trained a lexical language model, Glove, and a supra-lexical language model, GPT-2, on a text corpus. We then assessed to what extent these information-restricted models were able to predict the time-courses of fMRI signal of humans listening to naturalistic text. Our analyses show that, while most brain regions involved in language are sensitive to both syntactic and semantic variables, the relative magnitudes of these effects vary a lot across these regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T08:16:18Z)
• Joint processing of linguistic properties in brains and language models [14.997785690790032]
  We investigate the correspondence between the detailed processing of linguistic information by the human brain versus language models. We find that elimination of specific linguistic properties results in a significant decrease in brain alignment. These findings provide clear evidence for the role of specific linguistic information in the alignment between brain and language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T19:13:42Z)
• Neural Language Models are not Born Equal to Fit Brain Data, but Training Helps [75.84770193489639]
  We examine the impact of test loss, training corpus and model architecture on the prediction of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging timecourses of participants listening to an audiobook. We find that untrained versions of each model already explain significant amount of signal in the brain by capturing similarity in brain responses across identical words. We suggest good practices for future studies aiming at explaining the human language system using neural language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-07T15:37:17Z)
• Model-based analysis of brain activity reveals the hierarchy of language in 305 subjects [82.81964713263483]
  A popular approach to decompose the neural bases of language consists in correlating, across individuals, the brain responses to different stimuli. Here, we show that a model-based approach can reach equivalent results within subjects exposed to natural stimuli.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T15:30:21Z)
• Low-Dimensional Structure in the Space of Language Representations is Reflected in Brain Responses [62.197912623223964]
  We show a low-dimensional structure where language models and translation models smoothly interpolate between word embeddings, syntactic and semantic tasks, and future word embeddings. We find that this representation embedding can predict how well each individual feature space maps to human brain responses to natural language stimuli recorded using fMRI. This suggests that the embedding captures some part of the brain's natural language representation structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T22:59:12Z)
• Analyzing Individual Neurons in Pre-trained Language Models [41.07850306314594]
  We find small subsets of neurons to predict linguistic tasks, with lower level tasks localized in fewer neurons, compared to higher level task of predicting syntax. For example, we found neurons in XLNet to be more localized and disjoint when predicting properties compared to BERT and others, where they are more distributed and coupled.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T13:17:38Z)
• Mechanisms for Handling Nested Dependencies in Neural-Network Language Models and Humans [75.15855405318855]
  We studied whether a modern artificial neural network trained with "deep learning" methods mimics a central aspect of human sentence processing. Although the network was solely trained to predict the next word in a large corpus, analysis showed the emergence of specialized units that successfully handled local and long-distance syntactic agreement. We tested the model's predictions in a behavioral experiment where humans detected violations in number agreement in sentences with systematic variations in the singular/plural status of multiple nouns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T12:00:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.