Corner Case Generation and Analysis for Safety Assessment of Autonomous Vehicles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.03483v1
• Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 02:48:23 GMT
• Title: Corner Case Generation and Analysis for Safety Assessment of Autonomous Vehicles
• Authors: Haowei Sun, Shuo Feng, Xintao Yan, Henry X. Liu
• Abstract summary: A unified framework is proposed to generate corner cases for the decision-making systems. Deep reinforcement learning techniques are applied to learn the behavior policy of background vehicles. With the learned policy, BVs will behave and interact with the CAVs more aggressively, resulting in more corner cases.
• Score: 3.673699859949693
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Testing and evaluation is a crucial step in the development and deployment of Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs). To comprehensively evaluate the performance of CAVs, it is of necessity to test the CAVs in safety-critical scenarios, which rarely happen in naturalistic driving environment. Therefore, how to purposely and systematically generate these corner cases becomes an important problem. Most existing studies focus on generating adversarial examples for perception systems of CAVs, whereas limited efforts have been put on the decision-making systems, which is the highlight of this paper. As the CAVs need to interact with numerous background vehicles (BVs) for a long duration, variables that define the corner cases are usually high dimensional, which makes the generation a challenging problem. In this paper, a unified framework is proposed to generate corner cases for the decision-making systems. To address the challenge brought by high dimensionality, the driving environment is formulated based on Markov Decision Process, and the deep reinforcement learning techniques are applied to learn the behavior policy of BVs. With the learned policy, BVs will behave and interact with the CAVs more aggressively, resulting in more corner cases. To further analyze the generated corner cases, the techniques of feature extraction and clustering are utilized. By selecting representative cases of each cluster and outliers, the valuable corner cases can be identified from all generated corner cases. Simulation results of a highway driving environment show that the proposed methods can effectively generate and identify the valuable corner cases.

Related papers

• Criteria for Uncertainty-based Corner Cases Detection in Instance Segmentation [2.9419365092937086]
  We present corner case criteria based on the predictive uncertainty. We evaluate each corner case criterion using the COCO and the NuImages dataset. We also provide a corner case decision function that allows us to distinguish each object into True Positive (TP), localization and/or classification corner case, or False Positive (FP)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T11:17:12Z)
• A novel framework for adaptive stress testing of autonomous vehicles in highways [3.2112502548606825]
  We propose a novel framework to explore corner cases that can result in safety concerns in a highway traffic scenario. We develop a new reward function for DRL to guide the AST in identifying crash scenarios based on the collision probability estimate. The proposed framework is further integrated with a new driving model enabling us to create more realistic traffic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T04:02:40Z)
• Bridging Data-Driven and Knowledge-Driven Approaches for Safety-Critical Scenario Generation in Automated Vehicle Validation [5.063522035689929]
  Automated driving vehicles (ADV) promise to enhance driving efficiency and safety, yet they face challenges in safety-critical scenarios. This paper investigates the complexities of employing two major scenario-generation solutions: data-driven and knowledge-driven methods. We introduce BridgeGen, a safety-critical scenario generation framework, designed to bridge the benefits of both solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T02:11:14Z)
• DARTH: Holistic Test-time Adaptation for Multiple Object Tracking [87.72019733473562]
  Multiple object tracking (MOT) is a fundamental component of perception systems for autonomous driving. Despite the urge of safety in driving systems, no solution to the MOT adaptation problem to domain shift in test-time conditions has ever been proposed. We introduce DARTH, a holistic test-time adaptation framework for MOT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T10:10:42Z)
• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• Online Safety Property Collection and Refinement for Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning in Mapless Navigation [79.89605349842569]
  We introduce the Collection and Refinement of Online Properties (CROP) framework to design properties at training time. CROP employs a cost signal to identify unsafe interactions and use them to shape safety properties. We evaluate our approach in several robotic mapless navigation tasks and demonstrate that the violation metric computed with CROP allows higher returns and lower violations over previous Safe DRL approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T21:19:36Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Generating and Characterizing Scenarios for Safety Testing of Autonomous Vehicles [86.9067793493874]
  We propose efficient mechanisms to characterize and generate testing scenarios using a state-of-the-art driving simulator. We use our method to characterize real driving data from the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) project. We rank the scenarios by defining metrics based on the complexity of avoiding accidents and provide insights into how the AV could have minimized the probability of incurring an accident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-12T17:00:23Z)
• An Application-Driven Conceptualization of Corner Cases for Perception in Highly Automated Driving [21.67019631065338]
  We provide an application-driven view of corner cases in highly automated driving. We extend an existing camera-focused systematization of corner cases by adding RADAR and LiDAR. We describe an exemplary toolchain for data acquisition and processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-05T13:56:37Z)
• Increasing the Confidence of Deep Neural Networks by Coverage Analysis [71.57324258813674]
  This paper presents a lightweight monitoring architecture based on coverage paradigms to enhance the model against different unsafe inputs. Experimental results show that the proposed approach is effective in detecting both powerful adversarial examples and out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-28T16:38:26Z)
• Efficient statistical validation with edge cases to evaluate Highly Automated Vehicles [6.198523595657983]
  The widescale deployment of Autonomous Vehicles seems to be imminent despite many safety challenges that are yet to be resolved. Existing standards focus on deterministic processes where the validation requires only a set of test cases that cover the requirements. This paper presents a new approach to compute the statistical characteristics of a system's behaviour by biasing automatically generated test cases towards the worst case scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-04T04:35:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.