Amazon Product Recommender System
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.04238v1
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 18:07:16 GMT
- Title: Amazon Product Recommender System
- Authors: Mohammad R. Rezaei
- Abstract summary: Customers who made purchases on Amazon provide reviews by rating the product from 1 to 5 stars and sharing a text summary of their experience and opinion of the product.
We analyzed what ratings score customers give to a specific product (a music track) in order to build a recommender model for digital music tracks on Amazon.
The Amazon review dataset contains 200,000 data samples; we train the models on 70% of the dataset and test the performance of the models on the remaining 30% of the dataset.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The number of reviews on Amazon has grown significantly over the years.
Customers who made purchases on Amazon provide reviews by rating the product
from 1 to 5 stars and sharing a text summary of their experience and opinion of
the product. The ratings of a product are averaged to provide an overall
product rating. We analyzed what ratings score customers give to a specific
product (a music track) in order to build a recommender model for digital music
tracks on Amazon. We test various traditional models along with our proposed
deep neural network (DNN) architecture to predict the reviews rating score. The
Amazon review dataset contains 200,000 data samples; we train the models on 70%
of the dataset and test the performance of the models on the remaining 30% of
the dataset.
Related papers
- Amazon-M2: A Multilingual Multi-locale Shopping Session Dataset for
Recommendation and Text Generation [127.35910314813854]
We present the Amazon Multi-locale Shopping Session dataset, namely Amazon-M2.
It is the first multilingual dataset consisting of millions of user sessions from six different locales.
Remarkably, the dataset can help us enhance personalization and understanding of user preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-19T00:08:49Z) - Towards Personalized Review Summarization by Modeling Historical Reviews
from Customer and Product Separately [59.61932899841944]
Review summarization is a non-trivial task that aims to summarize the main idea of the product review in the E-commerce website.
We propose the Heterogeneous Historical Review aware Review Summarization Model (HHRRS)
We employ a multi-task framework that conducts the review sentiment classification and summarization jointly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-27T12:32:55Z) - Cross-Domain Consumer Review Analysis [0.0]
The paper presents a cross-domain review analysis on four popular review datasets: Amazon, Yelp, Steam, IMDb.
The analysis is performed using Hadoop and Spark, which allows for efficient and scalable processing of large datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-23T18:16:09Z) - Efficient Few-Shot Fine-Tuning for Opinion Summarization [83.76460801568092]
Abstractive summarization models are typically pre-trained on large amounts of generic texts, then fine-tuned on tens or hundreds of thousands of annotated samples.
We show that a few-shot method based on adapters can easily store in-domain knowledge.
We show that this self-supervised adapter pre-training improves summary quality over standard fine-tuning by 2.0 and 1.3 ROUGE-L points on the Amazon and Yelp datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-04T16:38:37Z) - Identifying Hijacked Reviews [21.600163117735857]
Review Hijacking is a new review manipulation tactic in which unethical sellers "hijack" an existing product page.
We propose a framework to generate synthetically labeled data for review hijacking by swapping products and reviews.
We then evaluate the potential of both a Twin LSTM network and BERT sequence pair to distinguish legitimate reviews from hijacked ones using this data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-07T20:43:36Z) - Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing? [89.50052670307434]
We discuss the possibility of using state-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) models to generate first-pass peer reviews for scientific papers.
We collect a dataset of papers in the machine learning domain, annotate them with different aspects of content covered in each review, and train targeted summarization models that take in papers to generate reviews.
Comprehensive experimental results show that system-generated reviews tend to touch upon more aspects of the paper than human-written reviews.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-30T07:16:53Z) - E-commerce Query-based Generation based on User Review [1.484852576248587]
We propose a novel seq2seq based text generation model to generate answers to user's question based on reviews posted by previous users.
Given a user question and/or target sentiment polarity, we extract aspects of interest and generate an answer that summarizes previous relevant user reviews.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-11T04:58:31Z) - The Multilingual Amazon Reviews Corpus [46.84980931183582]
We present the Multilingual Amazon Reviews Corpus (MARC), a large-scale collection of Amazon reviews for multilingual text classification.
MARC contains reviews in English, Japanese, German, French, Spanish, and Chinese, which were collected between 2015 and 2019.
The corpus is balanced across the 5 possible star ratings, so each rating constitutes 20% of the reviews in each language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-06T09:34:01Z) - Context-aware Helpfulness Prediction for Online Product Reviews [34.47368084659301]
We propose a neural deep learning model that predicts the helpfulness score of a review.
This model is based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and a context-aware encoding mechanism.
We validated our model on human annotated dataset and the result shows that our model significantly outperforms existing models for helpfulness prediction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-27T18:19:26Z) - Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Noising and Denoising [85.49169453434554]
We create a synthetic dataset from a corpus of user reviews by sampling a review, pretending it is a summary, and generating noisy versions thereof.
At test time, the model accepts genuine reviews and generates a summary containing salient opinions, treating those that do not reach consensus as noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T16:54:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.