Responsibility Management through Responsibility Networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.07246v3
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 22:35:50 GMT
- Title: Responsibility Management through Responsibility Networks
- Authors: Ruijun Chen, Jiong Qiu and Xuejiao Tang
- Abstract summary: We deploy the Internet of Responsibilities (IoR) for responsibility management.
Through the building of IoR framework, hierarchical responsibility management, automated responsibility evaluation at all level and efficient responsibility perception are achieved.
- Score: 3.1291878216258064
- License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Abstract: The safety management is critically important in the workplace.
Unfortunately, responsibility issues therein such as inefficient supervision,
poor evaluation and inadequate perception have not been properly addressed. To
this end, in this paper, we deploy the Internet of Responsibilities (IoR) for
responsibility management. Through the building of IoR framework, hierarchical
responsibility management, automated responsibility evaluation at all level and
efficient responsibility perception are achieved. The practical deployment of
IoR system showed its effective responsibility management capability in various
workplaces.
Related papers
- CoAct: A Global-Local Hierarchy for Autonomous Agent Collaboration [87.51781348070914]
Existing LLMs exhibit remarkable performance on various NLP tasks, but still struggle with complex real-world tasks.
We propose the CoAct framework, which transfers the hierarchical planning and collaboration patterns in human society to LLM systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T09:23:53Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - Responsibility in Extensive Form Games [1.4104545468525629]
Two different forms of responsibility, counterfactual and seeing-to-it, have been extensively discussed in the philosophy and AI.
This paper proposes a definition of seeing-to-it responsibility for such settings that amalgamate the two modalities.
It shows that although these two forms of responsibility are not enough to ascribe responsibility in each possible situation, this gap does not exist if higher-order responsibility is taken into account.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-12T10:41:17Z) - The Internet of Responsibilities-Connecting Human Responsibilities using
Big Data and Blockchain [5.030698439873751]
We introduce a novel notion, the Internet of responsibilities, for accountability management.
The system detects and collects responsibilities, and represents risk areas in terms of the positions of the responsibility nodes.
An automatic reminder and assignment system is used to enforce a strict responsibility control without human intervention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T22:16:31Z) - Accountability in Offline Reinforcement Learning: Explaining Decisions
with a Corpus of Examples [70.84093873437425]
This paper introduces the Accountable Offline Controller (AOC) that employs the offline dataset as the Decision Corpus.
AOC operates effectively in low-data scenarios, can be extended to the strictly offline imitation setting, and displays qualities of both conservation and adaptability.
We assess AOC's performance in both simulated and real-world healthcare scenarios, emphasizing its capability to manage offline control tasks with high levels of performance while maintaining accountability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T17:20:32Z) - Unravelling Responsibility for AI [0.8836921728313208]
It is widely acknowledged that we need to establish where responsibility lies for the outputs and impacts of AI-enabled systems.
This paper draws upon central distinctions in philosophy and law to clarify the concept of responsibility for AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-04T13:12:17Z) - Assurance for Autonomy -- JPL's past research, lessons learned, and
future directions [56.32768279109502]
Autonomy is required when a wide variation in circumstances precludes responses being pre-planned.
Mission assurance is a key contributor to providing confidence, yet assurance practices honed over decades of spaceflight have relatively little experience with autonomy.
Researchers in JPL's software assurance group have been involved in the development of techniques specific to the assurance of autonomy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-16T18:24:12Z) - A Data-driven Human Responsibility Management System [11.650998188402209]
An ideal safe workplace is described as a place where staffs fulfill responsibilities in a well-organized order.
occupational-related death and injury are still increasing and have been highly attended in the last decades due to the lack of comprehensive safety management.
A smart safety management system is therefore urgently needed, in which the staffs are instructed to fulfill responsibilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-06T06:16:51Z) - Responsible AI and Its Stakeholders [14.129366395072026]
We discuss three notions of responsibility (i.e., blameworthiness, accountability, and liability) for all stakeholders, including AI, and suggest the roles of jurisdiction and the general public in this matter.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-23T19:27:19Z) - Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable
Claims [59.64274607533249]
AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable.
This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems.
We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z) - Weakly-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Controllable Behavior [126.04932929741538]
Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful framework for learning to take actions to solve tasks.
In many settings, an agent must winnow down the inconceivably large space of all possible tasks to the single task that it is currently being asked to solve.
We introduce a framework for using weak supervision to automatically disentangle this semantically meaningful subspace of tasks from the enormous space of nonsensical "chaff" tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-06T17:50:28Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.