The Internet of Responsibilities-Connecting Human Responsibilities using Big Data and Blockchain

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04729v1
• Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 22:16:31 GMT
• Title: The Internet of Responsibilities-Connecting Human Responsibilities using Big Data and Blockchain
• Authors: Xuejiao Tang, Jiong Qiu, Wenbin Zhang, Ibrahim Toure, Mingli Zhang, Enza Messina, Xueping Xie, Xuebing Wang, Sheng Yu
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel notion, the Internet of responsibilities, for accountability management. The system detects and collects responsibilities, and represents risk areas in terms of the positions of the responsibility nodes. An automatic reminder and assignment system is used to enforce a strict responsibility control without human intervention.
• Score: 5.030698439873751
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Accountability in the workplace is critically important and remains a challenging problem, especially with respect to workplace safety management. In this paper, we introduce a novel notion, the Internet of Responsibilities, for accountability management. Our method sorts through the list of responsibilities with respect to hazardous positions. The positions are interconnected using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) indicating the hierarchy of responsibilities in the organization. In addition, the system detects and collects responsibilities, and represents risk areas in terms of the positions of the responsibility nodes. Finally, an automatic reminder and assignment system is used to enforce a strict responsibility control without human intervention. Using blockchain technology, we further extend our system with the capability to store, recover and encrypt responsibility data. We show that through the application of the Internet of Responsibility network model driven by Big Data, enterprise and government agencies can attain a highly secured and safe workplace. Therefore, our model offers a combination of interconnected responsibilities, accountability, monitoring, and safety which is crucial for the protection of employees and the success of organizations.

Related papers

• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principles [60.03651084139836]
  This paper argues that the well-established design principles in information security should be employed when deploying Large Language Model (LLM) agents at scale.<n>We introduce AgentSandbox, a conceptual framework embedding these security principles to provide safeguards throughout an agent's life-cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T21:39:08Z)
• Towards Trustworthy GUI Agents: A Survey [64.6445117343499]
  This survey examines the trustworthiness of GUI agents in five critical dimensions. We identify major challenges such as vulnerability to adversarial attacks, cascading failure modes in sequential decision-making. As GUI agents become more widespread, establishing robust safety standards and responsible development practices is essential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T13:26:00Z)
• Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
  Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks. In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z)
• Causal Responsibility Attribution for Human-AI Collaboration [62.474732677086855]
  This paper presents a causal framework using Structural Causal Models (SCMs) to systematically attribute responsibility in human-AI systems. Two case studies illustrate the framework's adaptability in diverse human-AI collaboration scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T17:17:45Z)
• CRMArena: Understanding the Capacity of LLM Agents to Perform Professional CRM Tasks in Realistic Environments [90.29937153770835]
  We introduce CRMArena, a benchmark designed to evaluate AI agents on realistic tasks grounded in professional work environments. We show that state-of-the-art LLM agents succeed in less than 40% of the tasks with ReAct prompting, and less than 55% even with function-calling abilities. Our findings highlight the need for enhanced agent capabilities in function-calling and rule-following to be deployed in real-world work environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T17:30:51Z)
• Enhancing Supply Chain Visibility with Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models [49.898152180805454]
  This paper presents a novel framework leveraging Knowledge Graphs (KGs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance supply chain visibility. Our zero-shot, LLM-driven approach automates the extraction of supply chain information from diverse public sources. With high accuracy in NER and RE tasks, it provides an effective tool for understanding complex, multi-tiered supply networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T17:11:29Z)
• What's my role? Modelling responsibility for AI-based safety-critical systems [1.0549609328807565]
  It is difficult for developers and manufacturers to be held responsible for harmful behaviour of an AI-SCS. A human operator can become a "liability sink" absorbing blame for the consequences of AI-SCS outputs they weren't responsible for creating. This paper considers different senses of responsibility (role, moral, legal and causal), and how they apply in the context of AI-SCS safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T13:45:36Z)
• Unravelling Responsibility for AI [0.8836921728313208]
  It is widely acknowledged that we need to establish where responsibility lies for the outputs and impacts of AI-enabled systems. This paper draws upon central distinctions in philosophy and law to clarify the concept of responsibility for AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-04T13:12:17Z)
• Learning to Be Cautious [71.9871661858886]
  A key challenge in the field of reinforcement learning is to develop agents that behave cautiously in novel situations. We present a sequence of tasks where cautious behavior becomes increasingly non-obvious, as well as an algorithm to demonstrate that it is possible for a system to emphlearn to be cautious.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T16:52:45Z)
• Will bots take over the supply chain? Revisiting Agent-based supply chain automation [71.77396882936951]
  Agent-based supply chains have been proposed since early 2000; industrial uptake has been lagging. We find that agent-based technology has matured, and other supporting technologies that are penetrating supply chains are filling in gaps. For example, the ubiquity of IoT technology helps agents "sense" the state of affairs in a supply chain and opens up new possibilities for automation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-03T18:44:26Z)
• Responsibility Management through Responsibility Networks [3.1291878216258064]
  We deploy the Internet of Responsibilities (IoR) for responsibility management. Through the building of IoR framework, hierarchical responsibility management, automated responsibility evaluation at all level and efficient responsibility perception are achieved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-14T21:06:33Z)
• A Data-driven Human Responsibility Management System [11.650998188402209]
  An ideal safe workplace is described as a place where staffs fulfill responsibilities in a well-organized order. occupational-related death and injury are still increasing and have been highly attended in the last decades due to the lack of comprehensive safety management. A smart safety management system is therefore urgently needed, in which the staffs are instructed to fulfill responsibilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-06T06:16:51Z)
• A game-theoretic analysis of networked system control for common-pool resource management using multi-agent reinforcement learning [54.55119659523629]
  Multi-agent reinforcement learning has recently shown great promise as an approach to networked system control. Common-pool resources include arable land, fresh water, wetlands, wildlife, fish stock, forests and the atmosphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T14:12:26Z)
• On the Principle of Accountability: Challenges for Smart Homes & Cybersecurity [1.52292571922932]
  This chapter introduces the Accountability Principle and its role in data protection governance. We focus on what accountability means in the context of cybersecurity management in smart homes, considering the EU General Data Protection Law requirements to secure personal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T09:50:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.