Outside the Echo Chamber: Optimizing the Performative Risk

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.08570v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:36:39 GMT
• Title: Outside the Echo Chamber: Optimizing the Performative Risk
• Authors: John Miller, Juan C. Perdomo, Tijana Zrnic
• Abstract summary: We identify a natural set of properties of the loss function and model-induced distribution shift under which the performative risk is convex. We develop algorithms that leverage our structural assumptions to optimize the performative risk with better sample efficiency than generic methods for derivative-free convex optimization.
• Score: 21.62040119228266
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In performative prediction, predictions guide decision-making and hence can influence the distribution of future data. To date, work on performative prediction has focused on finding performatively stable models, which are the fixed points of repeated retraining. However, stable solutions can be far from optimal when evaluated in terms of the performative risk, the loss experienced by the decision maker when deploying a model. In this paper, we shift attention beyond performative stability and focus on optimizing the performative risk directly. We identify a natural set of properties of the loss function and model-induced distribution shift under which the performative risk is convex, a property which does not follow from convexity of the loss alone. Furthermore, we develop algorithms that leverage our structural assumptions to optimize the performative risk with better sample efficiency than generic methods for derivative-free convex optimization.

Related papers

• Rejection via Learning Density Ratios [50.91522897152437]
  Classification with rejection emerges as a learning paradigm which allows models to abstain from making predictions. We propose a different distributional perspective, where we seek to find an idealized data distribution which maximizes a pretrained model's performance. Our framework is tested empirically over clean and noisy datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T01:32:17Z)
• Uncertainty for Active Learning on Graphs [70.44714133412592]
  Uncertainty Sampling is an Active Learning strategy that aims to improve the data efficiency of machine learning models. We benchmark Uncertainty Sampling beyond predictive uncertainty and highlight a significant performance gap to other Active Learning strategies. We develop ground-truth Bayesian uncertainty estimates in terms of the data generating process and prove their effectiveness in guiding Uncertainty Sampling toward optimal queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T16:50:47Z)
• Data-Adaptive Tradeoffs among Multiple Risks in Distribution-Free Prediction [55.77015419028725]
  We develop methods that permit valid control of risk when threshold and tradeoff parameters are chosen adaptively. Our methodology supports monotone and nearly-monotone risks, but otherwise makes no distributional assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T17:28:06Z)
• Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization [29.24821214671497]
  Training machine learning and statistical models often involve optimizing a data-driven risk criterion. We propose a novel robust criterion by combining insights from Bayesian nonparametric (i.e., Dirichlet process) theory and a recent decision-theoretic model of smooth ambiguity-averse preferences. For practical implementation, we propose and study tractable approximations of the criterion based on well-known Dirichlet process representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T21:19:15Z)
• Model-Based Epistemic Variance of Values for Risk-Aware Policy Optimization [59.758009422067]
  We consider the problem of quantifying uncertainty over expected cumulative rewards in model-based reinforcement learning. We propose a new uncertainty Bellman equation (UBE) whose solution converges to the true posterior variance over values. We introduce a general-purpose policy optimization algorithm, Q-Uncertainty Soft Actor-Critic (QU-SAC) that can be applied for either risk-seeking or risk-averse policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T15:55:58Z)
• Pitfall of Optimism: Distributional Reinforcement Learning by Randomizing Risk Criterion [9.35556128467037]
  We present a novel distributional reinforcement learning algorithm that selects actions by randomizing risk criterion to avoid one-sided tendency on risk. Our theoretical results support that the proposed method does not fall into biased exploration and is guaranteed to converge to an optimal return.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T10:53:04Z)
• Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability [50.44439018155837]
  We propose to include a calibration term directly into the training objective of the neural model. By introducing a relaxation of the classical formulation of calibration error we enable end-to-end backpropagation. It is directly applicable to existing computational pipelines allowing reliable black-box posterior inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T10:20:45Z)
• Performative Prediction with Bandit Feedback: Learning through Reparameterization [23.039885534575966]
  performative prediction is a framework for studying social prediction in which the data distribution itself changes in response to the deployment of a model. We develop a reparametization that reparametrizes the performative prediction objective as a function of induced data distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T21:31:29Z)
• Optimizing the Performative Risk under Weak Convexity Assumptions [0.0]
  In performative prediction, a predictive model impacts the distribution that generates future data. Prior work has identified a pair of general conditions on the loss and the mapping from model parameters to distributions that implies convexity the performative risk. In this paper, we relax these assumptions, without sacrificing the amenability of the performative minimization risk problem for iterative optimization methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T01:07:09Z)
• Modeling the Second Player in Distributionally Robust Optimization [90.25995710696425]
  We argue for the use of neural generative models to characterize the worst-case distribution. This approach poses a number of implementation and optimization challenges. We find that the proposed approach yields models that are more robust than comparable baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T14:26:26Z)
• A Stochastic Subgradient Method for Distributionally Robust Non-Convex Learning [2.007262412327553]
  robustness is with respect to uncertainty in the underlying data distribution. We show that our technique converges to satisfying perturbationity conditions. We also illustrate the performance of our algorithm on real datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T18:52:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.