Entity-level Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.09130v1
- Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:07:28 GMT
- Title: Entity-level Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization
- Authors: Feng Nan, Ramesh Nallapati, Zhiguo Wang, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos,
Henghui Zhu, Dejiao Zhang, Kathleen McKeown, Bing Xiang
- Abstract summary: Key challenge for abstractive summarization is ensuring factual consistency of the generated summary with respect to the original document.
We propose a set of new metrics to quantify the entity-level factual consistency of generated summaries.
- Score: 26.19686599842915
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: A key challenge for abstractive summarization is ensuring factual consistency
of the generated summary with respect to the original document. For example,
state-of-the-art models trained on existing datasets exhibit entity
hallucination, generating names of entities that are not present in the source
document. We propose a set of new metrics to quantify the entity-level factual
consistency of generated summaries and we show that the entity hallucination
problem can be alleviated by simply filtering the training data. In addition,
we propose a summary-worthy entity classification task to the training process
as well as a joint entity and summary generation approach, which yield further
improvements in entity level metrics.
Related papers
- Write Summary Step-by-Step: A Pilot Study of Stepwise Summarization [48.57273563299046]
We propose the task of Stepwise Summarization, which aims to generate a new appended summary each time a new document is proposed.
The appended summary should not only summarize the newly added content but also be coherent with the previous summary.
We show that SSG achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of both automatic metrics and human evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-08T05:37:26Z) - GUMsley: Evaluating Entity Salience in Summarization for 12 English
Genres [14.37990666928991]
We present and evaluate GUMsley, the first entity salience dataset covering all named and non-named salient entities for 12 genres of English text.
We show that predicting or providing salient entities to several model architectures enhances performance and helps derive higher-quality summaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-31T16:30:50Z) - Questioning the Validity of Summarization Datasets and Improving Their
Factual Consistency [14.974996886744083]
We release SummFC, a filtered summarization dataset with improved factual consistency.
We argue that our dataset should become a valid benchmark for developing and evaluating summarization systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-31T15:04:20Z) - Masked Summarization to Generate Factually Inconsistent Summaries for
Improved Factual Consistency Checking [28.66287193703365]
We propose to generate factually inconsistent summaries using source texts and reference summaries with key information masked.
Experiments on seven benchmark datasets demonstrate that factual consistency classifiers trained on summaries generated using our method generally outperform existing models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-04T12:48:49Z) - Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Content Planning [58.5308638148329]
We show that explicitly incorporating content planning in a summarization model yields output of higher quality.
We also create synthetic datasets which are more natural, resembling real world document-summary pairs.
Our approach outperforms competitive models in generating informative, coherent, and fluent summaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-14T18:41:58Z) - Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text Summarization [98.27031108197944]
Span-Fact is a suite of two factual correction models that leverages knowledge learned from question answering models to make corrections in system-generated summaries via span selection.
Our models employ single or multi-masking strategies to either iteratively or auto-regressively replace entities in order to ensure semantic consistency w.r.t. the source text.
Experiments show that our models significantly boost the factual consistency of system-generated summaries without sacrificing summary quality in terms of both automatic metrics and human evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-06T02:51:02Z) - Few-Shot Learning for Opinion Summarization [117.70510762845338]
Opinion summarization is the automatic creation of text reflecting subjective information expressed in multiple documents.
In this work, we show that even a handful of summaries is sufficient to bootstrap generation of the summary text.
Our approach substantially outperforms previous extractive and abstractive methods in automatic and human evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-30T15:37:38Z) - Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Noising and Denoising [85.49169453434554]
We create a synthetic dataset from a corpus of user reviews by sampling a review, pretending it is a summary, and generating noisy versions thereof.
At test time, the model accepts genuine reviews and generates a summary containing salient opinions, treating those that do not reach consensus as noise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T16:54:57Z) - Enhancing Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization [57.67609672082137]
We propose a fact-aware summarization model FASum to extract and integrate factual relations into the summary generation process.
We then design a factual corrector model FC to automatically correct factual errors from summaries generated by existing systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-19T07:36:10Z) - StructSum: Summarization via Structured Representations [27.890477913486787]
Abstractive text summarization aims at compressing the information of a long source document into a condensed summary.
Despite advances in modeling techniques, abstractive summarization models still suffer from several key challenges.
We propose a framework based on document-level structure induction for summarization to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-01T20:32:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.