JST-RR Model: Joint Modeling of Ratings and Reviews in Sentiment-Topic Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.11048v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:47:34 GMT
• Title: JST-RR Model: Joint Modeling of Ratings and Reviews in Sentiment-Topic Prediction
• Authors: Qiao Liang, Shyam Ranganathan, Kaibo Wang and Xinwei Deng
• Abstract summary: We propose a probabilistic model to accommodate both textual reviews and overall ratings. The proposed method can enhance the prediction accuracy of review data and achieve an effective detection of interpretable topics and sentiments.
• Score: 2.3834926671238916
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Analysis of online reviews has attracted great attention with broad applications. Often times, the textual reviews are coupled with the numerical ratings in the data. In this work, we propose a probabilistic model to accommodate both textual reviews and overall ratings with consideration of their intrinsic connection for a joint sentiment-topic prediction. The key of the proposed method is to develop a unified generative model where the topic modeling is constructed based on review texts and the sentiment prediction is obtained by combining review texts and overall ratings. The inference of model parameters are obtained by an efficient Gibbs sampling procedure. The proposed method can enhance the prediction accuracy of review data and achieve an effective detection of interpretable topics and sentiments. The merits of the proposed method are elaborated by the case study from Amazon datasets and simulation studies.

Related papers

• Estimating Agreement by Chance for Sequence Annotation [3.039887427447867]
  We introduce a novel model for generating random annotations, which serves as the foundation for estimating chance agreement in sequence annotation tasks. We successfully derive the analytical form of the distribution, enabling the computation of the probable location of each annotated text segment and subsequent chance agreement estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:32:47Z)
• ElicitationGPT: Text Elicitation Mechanisms via Language Models [12.945581341789431]
  This paper develops mechanisms for scoring elicited text against ground truth text using domain-knowledge-free queries to a large language model. An empirical evaluation is conducted on peer reviews from a peer-grading dataset and in comparison to manual instructor scores for the peer reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T17:49:10Z)
• Finding fake reviews in e-commerce platforms by using hybrid algorithms [0.0]
  We propose an innovative ensemble approach for sentiment analysis for finding fake reviews. Our ensemble architecture strategically combines diverse models to capitalize on their strengths while mitigating inherent weaknesses. Our findings underscore the potential of ensemble techniques in advancing the state-of-the-art in finding fake reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T14:25:27Z)
• Exploring the Power of Topic Modeling Techniques in Analyzing Customer Reviews: A Comparative Analysis [0.0]
  Machine learning and natural language processing algorithms have been deployed to analyze the vast amount of textual data available online. In this study, we examine and compare five frequently used topic modeling methods specifically applied to customer reviews. Our findings reveal that BERTopic consistently yield more meaningful extracted topics and achieve favorable results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-19T08:18:04Z)
• A Unified Evaluation of Textual Backdoor Learning: Frameworks and Benchmarks [72.7373468905418]
  We develop an open-source toolkit OpenBackdoor to foster the implementations and evaluations of textual backdoor learning. We also propose CUBE, a simple yet strong clustering-based defense baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T02:29:23Z)
• Aspect-Controllable Opinion Summarization [58.5308638148329]
  We propose an approach that allows the generation of customized summaries based on aspect queries. Using a review corpus, we create a synthetic training dataset of (review, summary) pairs enriched with aspect controllers. We fine-tune a pretrained model using our synthetic dataset and generate aspect-specific summaries by modifying the aspect controllers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T16:09:17Z)
• ConvoSumm: Conversation Summarization Benchmark and Improved Abstractive Summarization with Argument Mining [61.82562838486632]
  We crowdsource four new datasets on diverse online conversation forms of news comments, discussion forums, community question answering forums, and email threads. We benchmark state-of-the-art models on our datasets and analyze characteristics associated with the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T22:17:13Z)
• A Disentangled Adversarial Neural Topic Model for Separating Opinions from Plots in User Reviews [35.802290746473524]
  We propose a neural topic model combined with adversarial training to disentangle opinion topics from plot and neutral ones. We conduct an experimental assessment introducing a new collection of movie and book reviews paired with their plots. Showing an improved coherence and variety of topics, a consistent disentanglement rate, and sentiment classification performance superior to other supervised topic models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T02:15:13Z)
• SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluation [169.622515287256]
  We re-evaluate 14 automatic evaluation metrics in a comprehensive and consistent fashion. We benchmark 23 recent summarization models using the aforementioned automatic evaluation metrics. We assemble the largest collection of summaries generated by models trained on the CNN/DailyMail news dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-24T16:25:19Z)
• A Revised Generative Evaluation of Visual Dialogue [80.17353102854405]
  We propose a revised evaluation scheme for the VisDial dataset. We measure consensus between answers generated by the model and a set of relevant answers. We release these sets and code for the revised evaluation scheme as DenseVisDial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T13:26:45Z)
• Latent Opinions Transfer Network for Target-Oriented Opinion Words Extraction [63.70885228396077]
  We propose a novel model to transfer opinions knowledge from resource-rich review sentiment classification datasets to low-resource task TOWE. Our model achieves better performance compared to other state-of-the-art methods and significantly outperforms the base model without transferring opinions knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-07T11:50:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.