Actionable Principles for Artificial Intelligence Policy: Three Pathways
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.12406v1
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:57:35 GMT
- Title: Actionable Principles for Artificial Intelligence Policy: Three Pathways
- Authors: Charlotte Stix
- Abstract summary: This paper proposes a novel framework for the development of Actionable Principles for AI.
The approach acknowledges the relevance of AI Ethics Principles and homes in on methodological elements to increase their practical implementability in policy processes.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: In the development of governmental policy for artificial intelligence (AI)
that is informed by ethics, one avenue currently pursued is that of drawing on
AI Ethics Principles. However, these AI Ethics Principles often fail to be
actioned in governmental policy. This paper proposes a novel framework for the
development of Actionable Principles for AI. The approach acknowledges the
relevance of AI Ethics Principles and homes in on methodological elements to
increase their practical implementability in policy processes. As a case study,
elements are extracted from the development process of the Ethics Guidelines
for Trustworthy AI of the European Commissions High Level Expert Group on AI.
Subsequently, these elements are expanded on and evaluated in light of their
ability to contribute to a prototype framework for the development of
Actionable Principles for AI. The paper proposes the following three
propositions for the formation of such a prototype framework: (1) preliminary
landscape assessments; (2) multi-stakeholder participation and cross-sectoral
feedback; and, (3) mechanisms to support implementation and
operationalizability.
Related papers
- Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
Particip-AI is a framework to gather current and future AI use cases and their harms and benefits from non-expert public.
We gather responses from 295 demographically diverse participants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - Responsible Artificial Intelligence: A Structured Literature Review [0.0]
The EU has recently issued several publications emphasizing the necessity of trust in AI.
This highlights the urgent need for international regulation.
This paper introduces a comprehensive and, to our knowledge, the first unified definition of responsible AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T17:01:13Z) - POLARIS: A framework to guide the development of Trustworthy AI systems [3.02243271391691]
There is a significant gap between high-level AI ethics principles and low-level concrete practices for AI professionals.
We develop a novel holistic framework for Trustworthy AI - designed to bridge the gap between theory and practice.
Our goal is to empower AI professionals to confidently navigate the ethical dimensions of Trustworthy AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-08T01:05:16Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - Report of the 1st Workshop on Generative AI and Law [78.62063815165968]
This report presents the takeaways of the inaugural Workshop on Generative AI and Law (GenLaw)
A cross-disciplinary group of practitioners and scholars from computer science and law convened to discuss the technical, doctrinal, and policy challenges presented by law for Generative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-11T04:13:37Z) - RE-centric Recommendations for the Development of Trustworthy(er)
Autonomous Systems [4.268504966623082]
Complying with the EU AI Act (AIA) guidelines while developing and implementing AI systems will soon be mandatory within the EU.
practitioners lack actionable instructions to operationalise ethics during AI systems development.
A literature review of different ethical guidelines revealed inconsistencies in the principles addressed and the terminology used to describe them.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-29T11:57:07Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - The Different Faces of AI Ethics Across the World: A
Principle-Implementation Gap Analysis [12.031113181911627]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming our daily life with several applications in healthcare, space exploration, banking and finance.
These rapid progresses in AI have brought increasing attention to the potential impacts of AI technologies on society.
Several ethical principles have been released by governments, national and international organisations.
These principles outline high-level precepts to guide the ethical development, deployment, and governance of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-12T22:41:08Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - AI virtues -- The missing link in putting AI ethics into practice [0.0]
The paper defines four basic AI virtues, namely justice, honesty, responsibility and care.
It defines two second-order AI virtues, prudence and fortitude, that bolster achieving the basic virtues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-25T14:14:47Z) - Hacia los Comit\'es de \'Etica en Inteligencia Artificial [68.8204255655161]
It is priority to create the rules and specialized organizations that can oversight the following of such rules.
This work proposes the creation, at the universities, of Ethical Committees or Commissions specialized on Artificial Intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-11T23:48:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.