Citizen Participation and Machine Learning for a Better Democracy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00508v1
• Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 13:30:07 GMT
• Title: Citizen Participation and Machine Learning for a Better Democracy
• Authors: M. Arana-Catania, F.A. Van Lier, Rob Procter, Nataliya Tkachenko, Yulan He, Arkaitz Zubiaga, Maria Liakata
• Abstract summary: We report on the progress of a project that aims to address barriers to citizen participation in democratic decision-making processes. The main objectives are to explore if the application of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning can improve citizens' experience of digital citizen participation platforms.
• Score: 22.682698778214434
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The development of democratic systems is a crucial task as confirmed by its selection as one of the Millennium Sustainable Development Goals by the United Nations. In this article, we report on the progress of a project that aims to address barriers, one of which is information overload, to achieving effective direct citizen participation in democratic decision-making processes. The main objectives are to explore if the application of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning can improve citizens' experience of digital citizen participation platforms. Taking as a case study the "Decide Madrid" Consul platform, which enables citizens to post proposals for policies they would like to see adopted by the city council, we used NLP and machine learning to provide new ways to (a) suggest to citizens proposals they might wish to support; (b) group citizens by interests so that they can more easily interact with each other; (c) summarise comments posted in response to proposals; (d) assist citizens in aggregating and developing proposals. Evaluation of the results confirms that NLP and machine learning have a role to play in addressing some of the barriers users of platforms such as Consul currently experience.

Related papers

• Thoughtful Adoption of NLP for Civic Participation: Understanding Differences Among Policymakers [17.47825333597848]
  Natural language processing tools have the potential to boost civic participation and enhance democratic processes. This study examines how different internal government stakeholders influence NLP tools' thoughtful adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T11:46:26Z)
• ElectionSim: Massive Population Election Simulation Powered by Large Language Model Driven Agents [70.17229548653852]
  We introduce ElectionSim, an innovative election simulation framework based on large language models. We present a million-level voter pool sampled from social media platforms to support accurate individual simulation. We also introduce PPE, a poll-based presidential election benchmark to assess the performance of our framework under the U.S. presidential election scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T05:25:50Z)
• Can LLMs advance democratic values? [0.0]
  We argue that LLMs should be kept well clear of formal democratic decision-making processes. They can be put to good use in strengthening the informal public sphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T23:24:06Z)
• From Experts to the Public: Governing Multimodal Language Models in Politically Sensitive Video Analysis [48.14390493099495]
  This paper examines the governance of large language models (MM-LLMs) through individual and collective deliberation. We conducted a two-step study: first, interviews with 10 journalists established a baseline understanding of expert video interpretation; second, 114 individuals from the general public engaged in deliberation using Inclusive.AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T03:17:38Z)
• Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models [54.48283690603358]
  This study seeks to identify and quantify biases in simulating political samples with Large Language Models. Using the GPT-3.5-Turbo model, we leverage data from the American National Election Studies, German Longitudinal Election Study, Zuobiao dataset, and China Family Panel Studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T05:52:26Z)
• Designing Digital Voting Systems for Citizens: Achieving Fairness and Legitimacy in Participatory Budgeting [10.977733942901535]
  Participatory Budgeting (PB) has evolved into a key democratic instrument for resource allocation in cities. This work presents the results of behavioural experiments where participants were asked to vote in a fictional PB setting. We identify approaches to designing PB voting that minimise cognitive load and enhance the perceived fairness and legitimacy of the digital process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T12:25:48Z)
• Consensus-based Participatory Budgeting for Legitimacy: Decision Support via Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [3.3504365823045044]
  Participatory budgeting is a process where voting outcomes may not always be fair or inclusive. This paper introduces a novel and legitimate consensus-based participatory budgeting process. Voters are assisted to interact with each other to make viable compromises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T16:16:23Z)
• UKP-SQuARE: An Interactive Tool for Teaching Question Answering [61.93372227117229]
  The exponential growth of question answering (QA) has made it an indispensable topic in any Natural Language Processing (NLP) course. We introduce UKP-SQuARE as a platform for QA education. Students can run, compare, and analyze various QA models from different perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T11:29:04Z)
• Lessons Learned from a Citizen Science Project for Natural Language Processing [53.48988266271858]
  Citizen Science is an alternative to crowdsourcing that is relatively unexplored in the context of NLP. We conduct an exploratory study into engaging different groups of volunteers in Citizen Science for NLP by re-annotating parts of a pre-existing crowdsourced dataset. Our results show that this can yield high-quality annotations and attract motivated volunteers, but also requires considering factors such as scalability, participation over time, and legal and ethical issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T14:08:53Z)
• Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence [70.17085406202368]
  It has become an important topic to explore the impact of AI on society from a people-centered perspective. Previous works in citizen science have identified methods of using AI to engage the public in research. This article discusses the challenges of applying AI in Community Citizen Science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T12:51:11Z)
• A mixed-methods ethnographic approach to participatory budgeting in Scotland [11.943141057130228]
  Participatory budgeting (PB) is already well established in Scotland in the form of community led grant-making. This research paper explores how each of the 32 local authorities that make up Scotland utilise the Consul platform to engage their citizens in the PB process. We focus on whether natural language processing (NLP) tools can facilitate both citizen engagement, and the processes by which citizens' contributions are analysed and translated into policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-20T13:04:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.