A mixed-methods ethnographic approach to participatory budgeting in Scotland

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09517v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:04:24 GMT
• Title: A mixed-methods ethnographic approach to participatory budgeting in Scotland
• Authors: Jonathan Davies, M. Arana-Catania, Rob Procter, F.A. Van Lier, Yulan He
• Abstract summary: Participatory budgeting (PB) is already well established in Scotland in the form of community led grant-making. This research paper explores how each of the 32 local authorities that make up Scotland utilise the Consul platform to engage their citizens in the PB process. We focus on whether natural language processing (NLP) tools can facilitate both citizen engagement, and the processes by which citizens' contributions are analysed and translated into policies.
• Score: 11.943141057130228
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Participatory budgeting (PB) is already well established in Scotland in the form of community led grant-making yet has recently transformed from a grass-roots activity to a mainstream process or embedded 'policy instrument'. An integral part of this turn is the use of the Consul digital platform as the primary means of citizen participation. Using a mixed method approach, this ongoing research paper explores how each of the 32 local authorities that make up Scotland utilise the Consul platform to engage their citizens in the PB process and how they then make sense of citizens' contributions. In particular, we focus on whether natural language processing (NLP) tools can facilitate both citizen engagement, and the processes by which citizens' contributions are analysed and translated into policies.

Related papers

• Designing Digital Voting Systems for Citizens: Achieving Fairness and Legitimacy in Participatory Budgeting [10.977733942901535]
  Participatory Budgeting (PB) has evolved into a key democratic instrument for resource allocation in cities. This work presents the results of behavioural experiments where participants were asked to vote in a fictional PB setting. We identify approaches to designing PB voting that minimise cognitive load and enhance the perceived fairness and legitimacy of the digital process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T12:25:48Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Topic Classification in the Domain of Public Affairs [65.9077733300329]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to greatly enhance the analysis of public affairs documents. LLMs can be of great use to process domain-specific documents, such as those in the domain of public affairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T13:35:01Z)
• Lessons Learned from a Citizen Science Project for Natural Language Processing [53.48988266271858]
  Citizen Science is an alternative to crowdsourcing that is relatively unexplored in the context of NLP. We conduct an exploratory study into engaging different groups of volunteers in Citizen Science for NLP by re-annotating parts of a pre-existing crowdsourced dataset. Our results show that this can yield high-quality annotations and attract motivated volunteers, but also requires considering factors such as scalability, participation over time, and legal and ethical issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T14:08:53Z)
• Embedding digital participatory budgeting within local government: motivations, strategies and barriers faced [7.635177360289978]
  Local council officers must work as mediators in the transitional space between representative structures and new, innovative ways of working. To do so they must be well trained and well resourced, including the ability to use digital platforms effectively. This provides the necessary, accessible, transparent and deliberative space for participation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T11:45:09Z)
• DEBACER: a method for slicing moderated debates [55.705662163385966]
  Partitioning debates into blocks with the same subject is essential for understanding. We propose a new algorithm, DEBACER, which partitions moderated debates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-10T10:39:07Z)
• Evaluating the application of NLP tools in mainstream participatory budgeting processes in Scotland [11.943141057130228]
  Participatory budgeting (PB) in Scotland has grown from a handful of community-led processes to a movement supported by local and national government. At least 1% of local authority budgets will be subject to PB. This research paper explores the challenges that emerge from this'scaling up' or'mainstreaming' across the 32 local authorities that make up Scotland.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-23T10:23:58Z)
• Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence [70.17085406202368]
  It has become an important topic to explore the impact of AI on society from a people-centered perspective. Previous works in citizen science have identified methods of using AI to engage the public in research. This article discusses the challenges of applying AI in Community Citizen Science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T12:51:11Z)
• Ensuring the Inclusive Use of Natural Language Processing in the Global Response to COVID-19 [58.720142291102135]
  We discuss ways in which current and future NLP approaches can be made more inclusive by covering low-resource languages. We suggest several future directions for researchers interested in maximizing the positive societal impacts of NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-11T12:54:26Z)
• Participatory Budgeting with Donations and Diversity Constraints [31.521771465733057]
  Participatory budgeting (PB) is a democratic process where citizens jointly decide on how to allocate public funds to indivisible projects. This paper focuses on PB processes where citizens may give additional money to projects they want to see funded. We introduce a formal framework for this kind of PB with donations. Our framework also allows for diversity constraints, meaning that each project belongs to one or more types, and there are lower and upper bounds on the number of projects of the same type that can be funded.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-30T15:48:25Z)
• FedNLP: A Research Platform for Federated Learning in Natural Language Processing [55.01246123092445]
  We present the FedNLP, a research platform for federated learning in NLP. FedNLP supports various popular task formulations in NLP such as text classification, sequence tagging, question answering, seq2seq generation, and language modeling. Preliminary experiments with FedNLP reveal that there exists a large performance gap between learning on decentralized and centralized datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T11:04:49Z)
• Citizen Participation and Machine Learning for a Better Democracy [22.682698778214434]
  We report on the progress of a project that aims to address barriers to citizen participation in democratic decision-making processes. The main objectives are to explore if the application of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning can improve citizens' experience of digital citizen participation platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-28T13:30:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.