Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03874v1
• Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 18:59:39 GMT
• Title: Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset
• Authors: Dan Hendrycks and Collin Burns and Saurav Kadavath and Akul Arora and Steven Basart and Eric Tang and Dawn Song and Jacob Steinhardt
• Abstract summary: We introduce MATH, a dataset of 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems. Each problem has a full step-by-step solution which can be used to teach models to generate answer derivations and explanations. We also contribute a large auxiliary pretraining dataset which helps teach models the fundamentals of mathematics.
• Score: 55.4376028963537
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Many intellectual endeavors require mathematical problem solving, but this skill remains beyond the capabilities of computers. To measure this ability in machine learning models, we introduce MATH, a new dataset of 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems. Each problem in MATH has a full step-by-step solution which can be used to teach models to generate answer derivations and explanations. To facilitate future research and increase accuracy on MATH, we also contribute a large auxiliary pretraining dataset which helps teach models the fundamentals of mathematics. Even though we are able to increase accuracy on MATH, our results show that accuracy remains relatively low, even with enormous Transformer models. Moreover, we find that simply increasing budgets and model parameter counts will be impractical for achieving strong mathematical reasoning if scaling trends continue. While scaling Transformers is automatically solving most other text-based tasks, scaling is not currently solving MATH. To have more traction on mathematical problem solving we will likely need new algorithmic advancements from the broader research community.

Related papers

• MathFimer: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning by Expanding Reasoning Steps through Fill-in-the-Middle Task [49.355810887265925]
  We introduce MathFimer, a novel framework for mathematical reasoning step expansion. We develop a specialized model, MathFimer-7B, on our carefully curated NuminaMath-FIM dataset. We then apply these models to enhance existing mathematical reasoning datasets by inserting detailed intermediate steps into their solution chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T11:22:24Z)
• MATH-Perturb: Benchmarking LLMs' Math Reasoning Abilities against Hard Perturbations [90.07275414500154]
  We observe significant performance drops on MATH-P-Hard across various models. We also raise concerns about a novel form of memorization where models blindly apply learned problem-solving skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T13:31:46Z)
• MathLearner: A Large Language Model Agent Framework for Learning to Solve Mathematical Problems [0.936726079405677]
  We propose an agent framework for learning to solve mathematical problems based on inductive reasoning. By emulating the human learning process of generalization of learned information, this framework has great performance in the mathematical reasoning process. Our model can be used as a personalised learning aid, thus reducing the inequality of educational resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-03T13:28:19Z)
• AI-Assisted Generation of Difficult Math Questions [78.7547836422727]
  Current training positions mathematical reasoning as a core capability. There is unmet demand for diverse and challenging math questions. We present a design framework that combines the strengths of LLMs with a human-in-the-loop approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T17:55:36Z)
• Mathify: Evaluating Large Language Models on Mathematical Problem Solving Tasks [34.09857430966818]
  We introduce an extensive mathematics dataset called "MathQuest" sourced from the 11th and 12th standard Mathematics NCERT textbooks. We conduct fine-tuning experiments with three prominent large language models: LLaMA-2, WizardMath, and MAmmoTH. Our experiments reveal that among the three models, MAmmoTH-13B emerges as the most proficient, achieving the highest level of competence in solving the presented mathematical problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T08:45:42Z)
• MathScale: Scaling Instruction Tuning for Mathematical Reasoning [70.89605383298331]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in problem-solving. However, their proficiency in solving mathematical problems remains inadequate. We propose MathScale, a simple and scalable method to create high-quality mathematical reasoning data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T11:42:59Z)
• MATHSENSEI: A Tool-Augmented Large Language Model for Mathematical Reasoning [2.9104279358536647]
  We present MathSensei, a tool-augmented large language model for mathematical reasoning. We study the complementary benefits of the tools - knowledge retriever (Bing Web Search), program generator + executor (Python), and symbolic equation solver (Wolfram-Alpha API)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T05:50:35Z)
• A Survey of Deep Learning for Mathematical Reasoning [71.88150173381153]
  We review the key tasks, datasets, and methods at the intersection of mathematical reasoning and deep learning over the past decade. Recent advances in large-scale neural language models have opened up new benchmarks and opportunities to use deep learning for mathematical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T18:46:16Z)
• Reverse Operation based Data Augmentation for Solving Math Word Problems [37.26159426631031]
  Recent models have reached their performance bottleneck and require more high-quality data for training. We propose a novel data augmentation method that reverses the mathematical logic of math word problems. We apply the augmented data on two SOTA math word problem solving models and compare our results with a strong data augmentation baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T11:59:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.