The Common Intuition to Transfer Learning Can Win or Lose: Case Studies for Linear Regression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.05621v4
• Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 14:35:18 GMT
• Title: The Common Intuition to Transfer Learning Can Win or Lose: Case Studies for Linear Regression
• Authors: Yehuda Dar, Daniel LeJeune, Richard G. Baraniuk,
• Abstract summary: We define a transfer learning approach to the target task as a linear regression optimization with a regularization on the distance between the to-be-learned target parameters and the already-learned source parameters. We show that for sufficiently related tasks, the optimally tuned transfer learning approach can outperform the optimally tuned ridge regression method.
• Score: 26.5147705530439
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We study a fundamental transfer learning process from source to target linear regression tasks, including overparameterized settings where there are more learned parameters than data samples. The target task learning is addressed by using its training data together with the parameters previously computed for the source task. We define a transfer learning approach to the target task as a linear regression optimization with a regularization on the distance between the to-be-learned target parameters and the already-learned source parameters. We analytically characterize the generalization performance of our transfer learning approach and demonstrate its ability to resolve the peak in generalization errors in double descent phenomena of the minimum L2-norm solution to linear regression. Moreover, we show that for sufficiently related tasks, the optimally tuned transfer learning approach can outperform the optimally tuned ridge regression method, even when the true parameter vector conforms to an isotropic Gaussian prior distribution. Namely, we demonstrate that transfer learning can beat the minimum mean square error (MMSE) solution of the independent target task. Our results emphasize the ability of transfer learning to extend the solution space to the target task and, by that, to have an improved MMSE solution. We formulate the linear MMSE solution to our transfer learning setting and point out its key differences from the common design philosophy to transfer learning.

Related papers

• Diffusion Generative Flow Samplers: Improving learning signals through partial trajectory optimization [87.21285093582446]
  Diffusion Generative Flow Samplers (DGFS) is a sampling-based framework where the learning process can be tractably broken down into short partial trajectory segments. Our method takes inspiration from the theory developed for generative flow networks (GFlowNets)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T09:39:05Z)
• Revisiting the Robustness of the Minimum Error Entropy Criterion: A Transfer Learning Case Study [16.07380451502911]
  This paper revisits the robustness of the minimum error entropy criterion to deal with non-Gaussian noises. We investigate its feasibility and usefulness in real-life transfer learning regression tasks, where distributional shifts are common.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T15:38:11Z)
• End-to-End Meta-Bayesian Optimisation with Transformer Neural Processes [52.818579746354665]
  This paper proposes the first end-to-end differentiable meta-BO framework that generalises neural processes to learn acquisition functions via transformer architectures. We enable this end-to-end framework with reinforcement learning (RL) to tackle the lack of labelled acquisition data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T10:58:46Z)
• Theoretical Characterization of the Generalization Performance of Overfitted Meta-Learning [70.52689048213398]
  This paper studies the performance of overfitted meta-learning under a linear regression model with Gaussian features. We find new and interesting properties that do not exist in single-task linear regression. Our analysis suggests that benign overfitting is more significant and easier to observe when the noise and the diversity/fluctuation of the ground truth of each training task are large.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-09T20:36:13Z)
• Meta Learning MDPs with Linear Transition Models [22.508479528847634]
  We study meta-learning in Markov Decision Processes (MDP) with linear transition models in the undiscounted episodic setting. We propose BUC-MatrixRL, a version of the UC-Matrix RL algorithm, and show it can meaningfully leverage a set of sampled training tasks. We prove that compared to learning the tasks in isolation, BUC-Matrix RL provides significant improvements in the transfer regret for high bias low variance task distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-21T14:57:03Z)
• Learning MDPs from Features: Predict-Then-Optimize for Sequential Decision Problems by Reinforcement Learning [52.74071439183113]
  We study the predict-then-optimize framework in the context of sequential decision problems (formulated as MDPs) solved via reinforcement learning. Two significant computational challenges arise in applying decision-focused learning to MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T23:53:31Z)
• Meta-learning Transferable Representations with a Single Target Domain [46.83481356352768]
  Fine-tuning and joint training do not always improve accuracy on downstream tasks. We propose Meta Representation Learning (MeRLin) to learn transferable features. MeRLin empirically outperforms previous state-of-the-art transfer learning algorithms on various real-world vision and NLP transfer learning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T01:57:37Z)
• Towards Accurate Knowledge Transfer via Target-awareness Representation Disentanglement [56.40587594647692]
  We propose a novel transfer learning algorithm, introducing the idea of Target-awareness REpresentation Disentanglement (TRED) TRED disentangles the relevant knowledge with respect to the target task from the original source model and used as a regularizer during fine-tuning the target model. Experiments on various real world datasets show that our method stably improves the standard fine-tuning by more than 2% in average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-16T17:45:08Z)
• Double Double Descent: On Generalization Errors in Transfer Learning between Linear Regression Tasks [30.075430694663293]
  We study the transfer learning process between two linear regression problems. We examine a parameter transfer mechanism whereby a subset of the parameters of the target task solution are constrained to the values learned for a related source task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T08:42:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.