Two tales of science technology linkage: Patent in-text versus front-page references

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.08931v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:28:28 GMT
• Title: Two tales of science technology linkage: Patent in-text versus front-page references
• Authors: Jian Wang and Suzan Verberne
• Abstract summary: This paper explores how the value of a patent depends on the characteristics of the scientific papers that it builds on. In-text referenced papers have a higher chance of being listed on the front-page of the same patent when they are moderately basic, less interdisciplinary, less novel, and more highly cited.
• Score: 8.731097761118972
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: There is recurrent debate about how useful science is for technological development, but we know little about what kinds of science are more useful for technology. This paper fills this gap in the literature by exploring how the value of a patent (as measured by patent forward citations and the stock market response to the issuing of the patent) depends on the characteristics of the scientific papers that it builds on, specifically, basicness, interdisciplinarity, novelty, and scientific citations. Using a dataset of 33,337 USPTO biotech utility patents and their 860,879 in-text references to Web of Science journal articles, we find (1) a positive effect of the number of referenced scientific papers, (2) an inverted U-shaped effect of basicness, (3) an insignificant effect of interdisciplinarity, (4) a discontinuous and nonlinear effect of novelty, and (5) a positive effect of scientific citations for patent market value but an insignificant effect on patent citations. In addition, in-text referenced papers have a higher chance of being listed on the front-page of the same patent when they are moderately basic, less interdisciplinary, less novel, and more highly cited. Accordingly, using front-page reference yields substantially different results than using in-text references.

Related papers

• PaECTER: Patent-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformers [0.16785092703248325]
  PaECTER is a publicly available, open-source document-level encoder specific for patents. We fine-tune BERT for Patents with examiner-added citation information to generate numerical representations for patent documents. PaECTER performs better in similarity tasks than current state-of-the-art models used in the patent domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T18:09:03Z)
• CausalCite: A Causal Formulation of Paper Citations [80.82622421055734]
  CausalCite is a new way to measure the significance of a paper by assessing the causal impact of the paper on its follow-up papers. It is based on a novel causal inference method, TextMatch, which adapts the traditional matching framework to high-dimensional text embeddings. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CausalCite on various criteria, such as high correlation with paper impact as reported by scientific experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-05T23:09:39Z)
• A Novel Patent Similarity Measurement Methodology: Semantic Distance and Technological Distance [0.0]
  Patent similarity analysis plays a crucial role in evaluating the risk of patent infringement. Recent advances in natural language processing technology offer a promising avenue for automating this process. We propose a hybrid methodology that takes into account similarity, measures the similarity between patents by considering the semantic similarity of patents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T07:55:31Z)
• Citation Trajectory Prediction via Publication Influence Representation Using Temporal Knowledge Graph [52.07771598974385]
  Existing approaches mainly rely on mining temporal and graph data from academic articles. Our framework is composed of three modules: difference-preserved graph embedding, fine-grained influence representation, and learning-based trajectory calculation. Experiments are conducted on both the APS academic dataset and our contributed AIPatent dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-02T07:43:26Z)
• Temporal search in the scientific space predicts breakthrough inventions [3.3504365823045035]
  We use a large corpus of patents and derive features characterizing how patents temporally search in the scientific space. We find that patents that cite scientific papers have more citations and substantially more likely to become breakthroughs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T22:08:33Z)
• CitationIE: Leveraging the Citation Graph for Scientific Information Extraction [89.33938657493765]
  We use the citation graph of referential links between citing and cited papers. We observe a sizable improvement in end-to-end information extraction over the state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T03:00:12Z)
• A Measure of Research Taste [91.3755431537592]
  We present a citation-based measure that rewards both productivity and taste. The presented measure, CAP, balances the impact of publications and their quantity. We analyze the characteristics of CAP for highly-cited researchers in biology, computer science, economics, and physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T18:01:47Z)
• Semantic Analysis for Automated Evaluation of the Potential Impact of Research Articles [62.997667081978825]
  This paper presents a novel method for vector representation of text meaning based on information theory. We show how this informational semantics is used for text classification on the basis of the Leicester Scientific Corpus. We show that an informational approach to representing the meaning of a text has offered a way to effectively predict the scientific impact of research papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T20:37:13Z)
• Enhancing Scientific Papers Summarization with Citation Graph [78.65955304229863]
  We redefine the task of scientific papers summarization by utilizing their citation graph. We construct a novel scientific papers summarization dataset Semantic Scholar Network (SSN) which contains 141K research papers in different domains. Our model can achieve competitive performance when compared with the pretrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T11:13:35Z)
• Interdisciplinary research and technological impact: Evidence from biomedicine [2.741266294612776]
  We study one aspect of societal benefits that is contributing to the development of patented technologies. We measure the degree of interdisciplinarity of a paper using three popular indicators, namely variety, balance, and disparity. Our work may have policy implications for interdisciplinary research and scientific and technological impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-27T15:21:40Z)
• Technological impact of biomedical research: the role of basicness and novelty [2.741266294612776]
  Using a corpus of 3.8 million papers published between 1980 and 1999, we find that basic science papers and novel papers are substantially more likely to achieve direct technological impact. Further analysis that limits to papers with technological impact reveals that basic science and novel science have more patent citations, experience shorter time lag, and have impact in broader technological fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T18:31:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.