Interdisciplinary research and technological impact: Evidence from biomedicine

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.15383v3
• Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 10:30:04 GMT
• Title: Interdisciplinary research and technological impact: Evidence from biomedicine
• Authors: Qing Ke
• Abstract summary: We study one aspect of societal benefits that is contributing to the development of patented technologies. We measure the degree of interdisciplinarity of a paper using three popular indicators, namely variety, balance, and disparity. Our work may have policy implications for interdisciplinary research and scientific and technological impact.
• Score: 2.741266294612776
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Interdisciplinary research (IDR) has been considered as an important source for scientific breakthroughs and as a solution to today's complex societal challenges. While ample empirical evidence has suggested its benefits within the academia such as better creativity and higher scientific impact and visibility, its societal benefits -- a key argument originally used for promoting IDR -- remain relatively unexplored. Here, we study one aspect of societal benefits, that is contributing to the development of patented technologies, and examine how IDR papers are referenced as "prior art" by patents over time. We draw on a large sample of biomedical papers published in 23 years and measure the degree of interdisciplinarity of a paper using three popular indicators, namely variety, balance, and disparity. We find that papers that cites more fields (variety) and whose distributions over those cited fields are more even (balance) are more likely to receive patent citations, but both effects can be offset if papers draw upon more distant fields (disparity). These associations are consistent across different citation-window lengths. We further find that conditional on receiving patent citations, the intensity of their technological impact, as measured as both raw and quality-adjusted number of citing patents, increases with balance and disparity. Our work may have policy implications for interdisciplinary research and scientific and technological impact.

Related papers

• Mapping the Increasing Use of LLMs in Scientific Papers [99.67983375899719]
  We conduct the first systematic, large-scale analysis across 950,965 papers published between January 2020 and February 2024 on the arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature portfolio journals. Our findings reveal a steady increase in LLM usage, with the largest and fastest growth observed in Computer Science papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T17:45:15Z)
• Position: AI/ML Influencers Have a Place in the Academic Process [82.2069685579588]
  We investigate the role of social media influencers in enhancing the visibility of machine learning research. We have compiled a comprehensive dataset of over 8,000 papers, spanning tweets from December 2018 to October 2023. Our statistical and causal inference analysis reveals a significant increase in citations for papers endorsed by these influencers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T20:05:49Z)
• CausalCite: A Causal Formulation of Paper Citations [80.82622421055734]
  CausalCite is a new way to measure the significance of a paper by assessing the causal impact of the paper on its follow-up papers. It is based on a novel causal inference method, TextMatch, which adapts the traditional matching framework to high-dimensional text embeddings. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CausalCite on various criteria, such as high correlation with paper impact as reported by scientific experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-05T23:09:39Z)
• Breaking Out of the Ivory Tower: A Large-scale Analysis of Patent Citations to HCI Research [13.172300323407143]
  We perform a large-scale measurement study primarily of 70,000 patent citations to premier HCI research venues. We observe that 20.1% of papers from these venues are cited by patents -- far greater than premier venues in science overall. The time lag between a patent and its paper citations is long (10.5 years) and getting longer, suggesting that HCI research and practice may not be efficiently connected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-31T05:56:59Z)
• Citation Trajectory Prediction via Publication Influence Representation Using Temporal Knowledge Graph [52.07771598974385]
  Existing approaches mainly rely on mining temporal and graph data from academic articles. Our framework is composed of three modules: difference-preserved graph embedding, fine-grained influence representation, and learning-based trajectory calculation. Experiments are conducted on both the APS academic dataset and our contributed AIPatent dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-02T07:43:26Z)
• Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future Directions [119.67643184567623]
  We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past. We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized. Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z)
• Relying on recent and temporally dispersed science predicts breakthrough inventions [1.2930336259963562]
  We use a large corpus of patents and derive features characterizing how patents temporally search in the scientific space. We find that patents that cite scientific papers have more citations and substantially more likely to become breakthroughs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T22:08:33Z)
• A Measure of Research Taste [91.3755431537592]
  We present a citation-based measure that rewards both productivity and taste. The presented measure, CAP, balances the impact of publications and their quantity. We analyze the characteristics of CAP for highly-cited researchers in biology, computer science, economics, and physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T18:01:47Z)
• Two tales of science technology linkage: Patent in-text versus front-page references [8.731097761118972]
  This paper explores how the value of a patent depends on the characteristics of the scientific papers that it builds on. In-text referenced papers have a higher chance of being listed on the front-page of the same patent when they are moderately basic, less interdisciplinary, less novel, and more highly cited.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T09:28:28Z)
• Technological impact of biomedical research: the role of basicness and novelty [2.741266294612776]
  Using a corpus of 3.8 million papers published between 1980 and 1999, we find that basic science papers and novel papers are substantially more likely to achieve direct technological impact. Further analysis that limits to papers with technological impact reveals that basic science and novel science have more patent citations, experience shorter time lag, and have impact in broader technological fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T18:31:05Z)
• The Offense-Defense Balance of Scientific Knowledge: Does Publishing AI Research Reduce Misuse? [0.0]
  There is growing concern over the potential misuse of artificial intelligence (AI) research. Publishing scientific research can facilitate misuse of the technology, but the research can also contribute to protections against misuse. This paper addresses the balance between these two effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-27T10:20:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.