Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Prediction of
Severe Outcomes in Suspected COVID-19 Infection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11269v1
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 00:03:27 GMT
- Title: Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Prediction of
Severe Outcomes in Suspected COVID-19 Infection
- Authors: Varun Buch, Aoxiao Zhong, Xiang Li, Marcio Aloisio Bezerra Cavalcanti
Rockenbach, Dufan Wu, Hui Ren, Jiahui Guan, Andrew Liteplo, Sayon Dutta,
Ittai Dayan, Quanzheng Li
- Abstract summary: COVID-19 patient triaging with predictive outcome of the patients upon first present to emergency department (ED) is crucial for improving patient prognosis.
We trained a deep feature fusion model to predict patient outcomes.
Model output was patient outcomes defined as the most insensitive oxygen therapy required.
Predictive risk scores for COVID-19 severe outcomes ("CO-RISK" score) were derived from model output and evaluated on the testing dataset.
- Score: 9.524156465126758
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: COVID-19 patient triaging with predictive outcome of the patients upon first
present to emergency department (ED) is crucial for improving patient
prognosis, as well as better hospital resources management and cross-infection
control. We trained a deep feature fusion model to predict patient outcomes,
where the model inputs were EHR data including demographic information,
co-morbidities, vital signs and laboratory measurements, plus patient's CXR
images. The model output was patient outcomes defined as the most insensitive
oxygen therapy required. For patients without CXR images, we employed Random
Forest method for the prediction. Predictive risk scores for COVID-19 severe
outcomes ("CO-RISK" score) were derived from model output and evaluated on the
testing dataset, as well as compared to human performance. The study's dataset
(the "MGB COVID Cohort") was constructed from all patients presenting to the
Mass General Brigham (MGB) healthcare system from March 1st to June 1st, 2020.
ED visits with incomplete or erroneous data were excluded. Patients with no
test order for COVID or confirmed negative test results were excluded. Patients
under the age of 15 were also excluded. Finally, electronic health record (EHR)
data from a total of 11060 COVID-19 confirmed or suspected patients were used
in this study. Chest X-ray (CXR) images were also collected from each patient
if available. Results show that CO-RISK score achieved area under the Curve
(AUC) of predicting MV/death (i.e. severe outcomes) in 24 hours of 0.95, and
0.92 in 72 hours on the testing dataset. The model shows superior performance
to the commonly used risk scores in ED (CURB-65 and MEWS). Comparing with
physician's decisions, CO-RISK score has demonstrated superior performance to
human in making ICU/floor decisions.
Related papers
- Deterioration Prediction using Time-Series of Three Vital Signs and
Current Clinical Features Amongst COVID-19 Patients [6.1594622252295474]
We develop a prognostic model that predicts if a patient will experience deterioration in the forthcoming 3-24 hours.
The model processes routine triadic vital signs: (a) oxygen saturation, (b) heart rate, and (c) temperature.
We train and evaluate the model using data collected from 37,006 COVID-19 patients at NYU Langone Health in New York, USA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-12T02:53:43Z) - The pitfalls of using open data to develop deep learning solutions for
COVID-19 detection in chest X-rays [64.02097860085202]
Deep learning models have been developed to identify COVID-19 from chest X-rays.
Results have been exceptional when training and testing on open-source data.
Data analysis and model evaluations show that the popular open-source dataset COVIDx is not representative of the real clinical problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-14T10:59:11Z) - Systematic investigation into generalization of COVID-19 CT deep
learning models with Gabor ensemble for lung involvement scoring [9.94980188821453]
This study investigates the generalizability of key published models using the publicly available COVID-19 Computed Tomography data.
We then assess the predictive ability of these models for COVID-19 severity using an independent new dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-20T03:49:48Z) - Deep learning-based COVID-19 pneumonia classification using chest CT
images: model generalizability [54.86482395312936]
Deep learning (DL) classification models were trained to identify COVID-19-positive patients on 3D computed tomography (CT) datasets from different countries.
We trained nine identical DL-based classification models by using combinations of the datasets with a 72% train, 8% validation, and 20% test data split.
The models trained on multiple datasets and evaluated on a test set from one of the datasets used for training performed better.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-18T21:14:52Z) - COVID-19 Prognosis via Self-Supervised Representation Learning and
Multi-Image Prediction [32.91440827855392]
We consider the task of predicting two types of patient deterioration based on chest X-rays.
Due to the relative scarcity of COVID-19 patient data, existing solutions leverage supervised pretraining on related non-COVID images.
In this paper, we use self-supervised learning based on the momentum contrast (MoCo) method in the pretraining phase to learn more general image representations to use for downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-13T07:03:17Z) - Classification supporting COVID-19 diagnostics based on patient survey
data [82.41449972618423]
logistic regression and XGBoost classifiers, that allow for effective screening of patients for COVID-19 were generated.
The obtained classification models provided the basis for the DECODE service (decode.polsl.pl), which can serve as support in screening patients with COVID-19 disease.
This data set consists of more than 3,000 examples is based on questionnaires collected at a hospital in Poland.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-24T17:44:01Z) - Individualized Prediction of COVID-19 Adverse outcomes with MLHO [9.197411456718708]
We developed an end-to-end Machine Learning framework that leverages iterative feature and algorithm selection to predict Health outcomes.
We modeled the four adverse outcomes utilizing about 600 features representing patients' pre-COVID health records and demographics.
Our results demonstrated that while demographic variables are important predictors of adverse outcomes after a COVID-19 infection, the incorporation of the past clinical records are vital for a reliable prediction model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-10T02:44:52Z) - Integrative Analysis for COVID-19 Patient Outcome Prediction [53.11258640541513]
We combine radiomics of lung opacities and non-imaging features from demographic data, vital signs, and laboratory findings to predict need for intensive care unit admission.
Our methods may also be applied to other lung diseases including but not limited to community acquired pneumonia.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-20T19:08:50Z) - Predicting COVID-19 Pneumonia Severity on Chest X-ray with Deep Learning [57.00601760750389]
We present a severity score prediction model for COVID-19 pneumonia for frontal chest X-ray images.
Such a tool can gauge severity of COVID-19 lung infections that can be used for escalation or de-escalation of care.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-24T23:13:16Z) - Hemogram Data as a Tool for Decision-making in COVID-19 Management:
Applications to Resource Scarcity Scenarios [62.997667081978825]
COVID-19 pandemics has challenged emergency response systems worldwide, with widespread reports of essential services breakdown and collapse of health care structure.
This work describes a machine learning model derived from hemogram exam data performed in symptomatic patients.
Proposed models can predict COVID-19 qRT-PCR results in symptomatic individuals with high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-10T01:45:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.