Neurons learn slower than they think
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.02578v1
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 09:09:52 GMT
- Title: Neurons learn slower than they think
- Abstract summary: This study introduces textitdifferential capability into an optimization process.
It measures whether the test accuracy increases as fast as a model approaches the decision boundary in a classification problem.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recent studies revealed complex convergence dynamics in gradient-based
methods, which has been little understood so far. Changing the step size to
balance between high convergence rate and small generalization error may not be
sufficient: maximizing the test accuracy usually requires a larger learning
rate than minimizing the training loss. To explore the dynamic bounds of
convergence rate, this study introduces \textit{differential capability} into
an optimization process, which measures whether the test accuracy increases as
fast as a model approaches the decision boundary in a classification problem.
The convergence analysis showed that: 1) a higher convergence rate leads to
slower capability growth; 2) a lower convergence rate results in faster
capability growth and decay; 3) regulating a convergence rate in either
direction reduces differential capability.
Related papers
- On the Convergence of Multicalibration Gradient Boosting [13.103291011255202]
We bridge the gap by providing convergence guarantees for multicalibration gradient boosting in regression with squared-error loss.<n>We show that the magnitude of successive prediction updates decays at $O(1/sqrtT)$, which implies the same convergence rate bound for the multicalibration error over rounds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-06T15:29:02Z) - Improved Convergence in Parameter-Agnostic Error Feedback through Momentum [49.163769734936295]
We study normalized error feedback algorithms that combine EF with normalized updates, various momentum variants, and parameter-agnostic, time-varying stepsizes.<n>Our results hold with decreasing stepsizes and small mini-batches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-18T13:47:08Z) - SGD Convergence under Stepsize Shrinkage in Low-Precision Training [0.0]
quantizing gradient shrinkage introduces magnitude shrinkage, which can change how gradient descent converges.<n>We show that this shrinkage affect the usual stepsize ( mu_k q_k ) with an effective stepsize ( mu_k q_k )<n>We prove that low-precision SGD still converges, but at a slower pace set by ( q_min ) and with a higher steady error level due to quantization effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-10T02:25:48Z) - Similarity Matching Networks: Hebbian Learning and Convergence Over Multiple Time Scales [5.093257685701887]
We consider and analyze the emphsimilarity matching network for principal subspace projection.<n>By leveraging a multilevel optimization framework, we prove convergence of the dynamics in the offline setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T14:46:22Z) - On Separation Between Best-Iterate, Random-Iterate, and Last-Iterate Convergence of Learning in Games [71.73971094342349]
Non-ergodic convergence of learning dynamics in games is widely studied because of its importance in both theory and practice.
Recent work showed that a broad class of learning dynamics, including Optimistic Multiplicative Weights Update, can exhibit arbitrarily slow last-iterate convergence.
We show that OMWU achieves an $O(T-1/6)$ best-iterate convergence rate, in stark contrast to its slow last-iterate convergence in the same class of games.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T17:49:24Z) - On the Convergence Rates of Federated Q-Learning across Heterogeneous Environments [6.6089456297043245]
We study synchronous federated Q-learning, which aims to learn an optimal Q-function by having $K$ agents average their local Q-estimates per $E$ iterations.
We observe an interesting phenomenon on the convergence speeds in terms of $K$ and $E$.
We prove that, for a wide range of stepsizes, the $ell_infty$ norm of the error cannot decay faster than $Theta (E/T)$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-05T20:09:56Z) - Adaptive Federated Learning Over the Air [108.62635460744109]
We propose a federated version of adaptive gradient methods, particularly AdaGrad and Adam, within the framework of over-the-air model training.
Our analysis shows that the AdaGrad-based training algorithm converges to a stationary point at the rate of $mathcalO( ln(T) / T 1 - frac1alpha ).
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T09:10:37Z) - Incremental Quasi-Newton Methods with Faster Superlinear Convergence
Rates [50.36933471975506]
We consider the finite-sum optimization problem, where each component function is strongly convex and has Lipschitz continuous gradient and Hessian.
The recently proposed incremental quasi-Newton method is based on BFGS update and achieves a local superlinear convergence rate.
This paper proposes a more efficient quasi-Newton method by incorporating the symmetric rank-1 update into the incremental framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-04T05:54:51Z) - On the Communication Complexity of Decentralized Bilevel Optimization [40.45379954138305]
We propose two novel decentralized bilevel gradient descent algorithms based on simultaneous and alternating update strategies.
Our algorithms can achieve faster convergence rates and lower communication costs than existing methods.
This is the first time such favorable theoretical results have been achieved with mild assumptions in the heterogeneous setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-19T14:56:26Z) - Over-Parameterization Exponentially Slows Down Gradient Descent for
Learning a Single Neuron [49.45105570960104]
We prove the global convergence of randomly gradient descent with a $Oleft(T-3right)$ rate.
These two bounds jointly give an exact characterization of the convergence rate.
We show this potential function converges slowly, which implies the slow convergence rate of the loss function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-20T15:33:26Z) - High-Probability Bounds for Stochastic Optimization and Variational
Inequalities: the Case of Unbounded Variance [59.211456992422136]
We propose algorithms with high-probability convergence results under less restrictive assumptions.
These results justify the usage of the considered methods for solving problems that do not fit standard functional classes in optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-02T10:37:23Z) - Super-Convergence with an Unstable Learning Rate [20.13887962999915]
Conventional wisdom dictates that learning rate should be in the stable regime so that gradient-based algorithms don't blow up.
This note introduces a simple scenario where an unstable learning rate scheme leads to a super fast convergence.
Our scheme uses a Cyclical Learning Rate where we periodically take one large unstable step and several small stable steps to compensate for the instability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-22T02:05:47Z) - A Qualitative Study of the Dynamic Behavior for Adaptive Gradient
Algorithms [12.865834066050427]
RMSprop and Adam algorithms are studied through a combination of careful numerical experiments and theoretical explanations.
Three types of qualitative features are observed in the training loss curve: fast initial convergence, oscillations, and large spikes in the late phase.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-14T00:33:48Z) - Balancing Rates and Variance via Adaptive Batch-Size for Stochastic
Optimization Problems [120.21685755278509]
In this work, we seek to balance the fact that attenuating step-size is required for exact convergence with the fact that constant step-size learns faster in time up to an error.
Rather than fixing the minibatch the step-size at the outset, we propose to allow parameters to evolve adaptively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-02T16:02:02Z) - Minimal Variance Sampling with Provable Guarantees for Fast Training of
Graph Neural Networks [22.618779809748435]
Existing sampling methods are mostly based on the graph structural information and ignore the dynamicity of optimization.
We propose a decoupled variance reduction strategy that employs (approximate) gradient information to adaptively sample nodes with minimal variance.
We show theoretically and empirically that the proposed method, even with smaller mini-batch sizes, enjoys a faster convergence rate and entails a better generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-24T16:49:29Z) - Fast Objective & Duality Gap Convergence for Non-Convex Strongly-Concave
Min-Max Problems with PL Condition [52.08417569774822]
This paper focuses on methods for solving smooth non-concave min-max problems, which have received increasing attention due to deep learning (e.g., deep AUC)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-12T00:32:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.