Exploring Polarization of Users Behavior on Twitter During the 2019 South American Protests

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.05611v1
• Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 07:13:18 GMT
• Title: Exploring Polarization of Users Behavior on Twitter During the 2019 South American Protests
• Authors: Ramon Villa-Cox, Helen (Shuxuan) Zeng, Ashiqur R. KhudaBukhsh, Kathleen M. Carley
• Abstract summary: We explore polarization on Twitter in a different context, namely the protest that paralyzed several countries in the South American region in 2019. By leveraging users' endorsement of politicians' tweets and hashtag campaigns with defined stances towards the protest (for or against), we construct a weakly labeled stance dataset with millions of users. We find empirical evidence of the "filter bubble" phenomenon during the event, as we not only show that the user bases are homogeneous in terms of stance, but the probability that a user transitions from media of different clusters is low.
• Score: 15.065938163384235
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Research across different disciplines has documented the expanding polarization in social media. However, much of it focused on the US political system or its culturally controversial topics. In this work, we explore polarization on Twitter in a different context, namely the protest that paralyzed several countries in the South American region in 2019. By leveraging users' endorsement of politicians' tweets and hashtag campaigns with defined stances towards the protest (for or against), we construct a weakly labeled stance dataset with millions of users. We explore polarization in two related dimensions: language and news consumption patterns. In terms of linguistic polarization, we apply recent insights that leveraged machine translation methods, showing that the two communities speak consistently "different" languages, mainly along ideological lines (e.g., fascist translates to communist). Our results indicate that this recently-proposed methodology is also informative in different languages and contexts than originally applied. In terms of news consumption patterns, we cluster news agencies based on homogeneity of their user bases and quantify the observed polarization in its consumption. We find empirical evidence of the "filter bubble" phenomenon during the event, as we not only show that the user bases are homogeneous in terms of stance, but the probability that a user transitions from media of different clusters is low.

Related papers

• Evolving linguistic divergence on polarizing social media [0.0]
  We quantify divergence in topics of conversation and word frequencies, messaging sentiment, and lexical semantics of words and emoji. While US American English remains largely intelligible within its large speech community, our findings point at areas where miscommunication may arise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T15:21:55Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [57.70351255180495]
  We apply a deep-learning-based computer-vision algorithm to a sample of 220 YouTube videos depicting political leaders from 15 different countries. We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of expressed negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Same Words, Different Meanings: Interpretable Predictions of Polarization Trends in Broadcast Media Language and Granger Causal Effects on Public Discourse [7.0525662747824365]
  We investigate the relationship between broadcast news media language and social media discourse. By analyzing a decade's worth of closed captions from CNN and Fox News along with topically corresponding discourse from Twitter, we show how semantic polarization between these outlets has evolved. Our results demonstrate a sharp increase in polarization in how topically important keywords are discussed between the two channels, especially after 2016, with overall highest peaks occurring in 2020.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-20T23:59:26Z)
• Detecting Political Biases of Named Entities and Hashtags on Twitter [28.02430167720734]
  Ideological divisions in the United States have become increasingly prominent in daily communication. By detecting political biases in a corpus of text, one can attempt to describe and discern the polarity of that text. We propose the Polarity-aware Embedding Multi-task learning model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T18:00:13Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Face Off: Polarized Public Opinions on Personal Face Mask Usage during the COVID-19 Pandemic [77.34726150561087]
  A series of policy shifts by various governmental bodies have been speculated to have contributed to the polarization of face masks. We propose a novel approach to accurately gauge public sentiment towards face masks in the United States during COVID-19. We find two key policy-shift events contributed to statistically significant changes in sentiment for both Republicans and Democrats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-31T18:52:41Z)
• Embeddings-Based Clustering for Target Specific Stances: The Case of a Polarized Turkey [6.130136112098865]
  We present an unsupervised method for target-specific stance detection in a polarized setting, specifically Turkish politics. We show the effectiveness of our method in properly clustering users of divergent groups across multiple targets. We perform our analysis on a large dataset of 108M Turkish election-related tweets along with the timeline tweets of 168k Turkish users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-19T13:52:15Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.