Certifying Emergency Landing for Safe Urban UAV
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.14928v1
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 11:47:46 GMT
- Title: Certifying Emergency Landing for Safe Urban UAV
- Authors: Joris Guerin, Kevin Delmas and J\'er\'emie Guiochet
- Abstract summary: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have the potential to be used for many applications in urban environments.
One of the main safety issues is the possibility for a failure to cause the loss of navigation capabilities.
Current standards, such as the SORA published in 2019, do not consider applicable mitigation techniques to handle this kind of hazardous situations.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) have the potential to be used for many
applications in urban environments. However, allowing UAVs to fly above densely
populated areas raises concerns regarding safety. One of the main safety issues
is the possibility for a failure to cause the loss of navigation capabilities,
which can result in the UAV falling/landing in hazardous areas such as busy
roads, where it can cause fatal accidents. Current standards, such as the SORA
published in 2019, do not consider applicable mitigation techniques to handle
this kind of hazardous situations. Consequently, certifying UAV urban
operations implies to demonstrate very high levels of integrity, which results
in prohibitive development costs. To address this issue, this paper explores
the concept of Emergency Landing (EL). A safety analysis is conducted on an
urban UAV case study, and requirements are proposed to enable the integration
of EL as an acceptable mitigation mean in the SORA. Based on these
requirements, an EL implementation was developed, together with a runtime
monitoring architecture to enhance confidence in the system. Preliminary
qualitative results are presented and the monitor seem to be able to detect
errors of the EL system effectively.
Related papers
- An Approach to Technical AGI Safety and Security [72.83728459135101]
We develop an approach to address the risk of harms consequential enough to significantly harm humanity.
We focus on technical approaches to misuse and misalignment.
We briefly outline how these ingredients could be combined to produce safety cases for AGI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-02T15:59:31Z) - Enhancing Disaster Resilience with UAV-Assisted Edge Computing: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Managing Heterogeneous Edge Devices [3.858859576352153]
Mobile edge computing in the form of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) has been proposed to provide offloading from these devices to conserve their battery.
This paper considers the use of UAVs with further constraints on power and connectivity to prolong the life of the network.
Reinforcement learning is used to investigate numerous scenarios of various levels of power and communication failure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-25T19:03:05Z) - Defining and Evaluating Physical Safety for Large Language Models [62.4971588282174]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to control robotic systems such as drones.
Their risks of causing physical threats and harm in real-world applications remain unexplored.
We classify the physical safety risks of drones into four categories: (1) human-targeted threats, (2) object-targeted threats, (3) infrastructure attacks, and (4) regulatory violations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T17:41:25Z) - Safety through Permissibility: Shield Construction for Fast and Safe Reinforcement Learning [57.84059344739159]
"Shielding" is a popular technique to enforce safety inReinforcement Learning (RL)
We propose a new permissibility-based framework to deal with safety and shield construction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T18:00:21Z) - MADRL-based UAVs Trajectory Design with Anti-Collision Mechanism in
Vehicular Networks [1.9662978733004604]
In upcoming 6G networks, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are expected to play a fundamental role by acting as mobile base stations.
One of the most challenging problems is the design of trajectories for multiple UAVs, cooperatively serving the same area.
We propose a rank-based binary masking approach to address these issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-21T20:08:32Z) - Segmentation of Drone Collision Hazards in Airborne RADAR Point Clouds
Using PointNet [0.7067443325368975]
A critical prerequisite for the integration is equipping UAVs with enhanced situational awareness to ensure safe operations.
Our study leverages radar technology for novel end-to-end semantic segmentation of aerial point clouds to simultaneously identify multiple collision hazards.
To our knowledge, this is the first approach addressing simultaneous identification of multiple collision threats in an aerial setting, achieving a robust 94% accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T16:04:58Z) - Toward collision-free trajectory for autonomous and pilot-controlled
unmanned aerial vehicles [1.018017727755629]
This study makes greater use of electronic conspicuity (EC) information made available by PilotAware Ltd in developing an advanced collision management methodology.
The merits of the DACM methodology have been demonstrated through extensive simulations and real-world field tests in avoiding mid-air collisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T18:24:31Z) - A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous
Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors.
We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z) - Evaluation of Runtime Monitoring for UAV Emergency Landing [0.0]
Emergency Landing (EL) aims at reducing ground risk by finding safe landing areas using on-board sensors.
The proposed EL pipeline includes mechanisms to monitor learning based during execution.
A new evaluation methodology is introduced, and applied to assess the practical safety benefits of three Machine Learning Monitoring mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-07T10:51:23Z) - Using UAVs for vehicle tracking and collision risk assessment at
intersections [2.090380922731455]
This research demonstrates the application of UAVs and V2X connectivity to track the movement of road users and assess potential collisions at intersections.
The proposed method combines deep-learning based tracking algorithms and time-to-collision tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-11T19:38:24Z) - A Multi-UAV System for Exploration and Target Finding in Cluttered and
GPS-Denied Environments [68.31522961125589]
We propose a framework for a team of UAVs to cooperatively explore and find a target in complex GPS-denied environments with obstacles.
The team of UAVs autonomously navigates, explores, detects, and finds the target in a cluttered environment with a known map.
Results indicate that the proposed multi-UAV system has improvements in terms of time-cost, the proportion of search area surveyed, as well as successful rates for search and rescue missions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-19T12:54:04Z) - Conservative Safety Critics for Exploration [120.73241848565449]
We study the problem of safe exploration in reinforcement learning (RL)
We learn a conservative safety estimate of environment states through a critic.
We show that the proposed approach can achieve competitive task performance while incurring significantly lower catastrophic failure rates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-27T17:54:25Z) - Cautious Adaptation For Reinforcement Learning in Safety-Critical
Settings [129.80279257258098]
Reinforcement learning (RL) in real-world safety-critical target settings like urban driving is hazardous.
We propose a "safety-critical adaptation" task setting: an agent first trains in non-safety-critical "source" environments.
We propose a solution approach, CARL, that builds on the intuition that prior experience in diverse environments equips an agent to estimate risk.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-15T01:40:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.