YAPS -- Your Open Examination System for Activating and emPowering Students

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.06552v1
• Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:52:43 GMT
• Title: YAPS -- Your Open Examination System for Activating and emPowering Students
• Authors: Fin Hendrik Bahnsen and Goerschwin Fey
• Abstract summary: We discuss design decisions and present the resulting architecture of YAPS - Your open Assessment system for emPowering Students. YAPS has been used for very diverse lectures in logistics, computer engineering, and algorithms for exams, but also for empowering students by fast feedback during the learning period.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: There are numerous e-assessment systems devoted to specific domains under diverse license models. Cost, extensibility, and maintainability are relevant issues for an institution. Ease of use and inclusion into courses are educator's main concerns. For students the user experience and fast transparent feedback plus "better" tests are most important. Many exams still focus on testing memorized knowledge, instead of improving and testing skills with competence-oriented learning support and examinations, respectively. We discuss design decisions and present the resulting architecture of YAPS - Your open Assessment system for emPowering Students. YAPS has been used for very diverse lectures in logistics, computer engineering, and algorithms for exams, but also for empowering students by fast feedback during the learning period. We report on results in a basic lecture on Computer Science for Mechanical Engineers.

Related papers

• Let Students Take the Wheel: Introducing Post-Quantum Cryptography with Active Learning [4.804847392457553]
  Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) has been identified as the solution to secure existing software systems. This research proposes a novel active learning approach and assesses the best practices for teaching PQC to undergraduate and graduate students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T01:52:03Z)
• Explainable Few-shot Knowledge Tracing [48.877979333221326]
  We propose a cognition-guided framework that can track the student knowledge from a few student records while providing natural language explanations. Experimental results from three widely used datasets show that LLMs can perform comparable or superior to competitive deep knowledge tracing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T10:07:21Z)
• Ruffle&Riley: Insights from Designing and Evaluating a Large Language Model-Based Conversational Tutoring System [21.139850269835858]
  Conversational tutoring systems (CTSs) offer learning experiences through interactions based on natural language. We discuss and evaluate a novel type of CTS that leverages recent advances in large language models (LLMs) in two ways. The system enables AI-assisted content authoring by inducing an easily editable tutoring script automatically from a lesson text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T14:57:55Z)
• VerAs: Verify then Assess STEM Lab Reports [2.4169078025984825]
  A dataset of two sets of college level lab reports from an inquiry-based physics curriculum relies on analytic assessment rubrics. Each analytic dimension is assessed on a 6-point scale, to provide detailed feedback to students that can help them improve their science writing skills. We present an end-to-end neural architecture that has separate verifier and assessment modules, inspired by approaches to Open Domain Question Answering (OpenQA)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T20:02:09Z)
• UKP-SQuARE: An Interactive Tool for Teaching Question Answering [61.93372227117229]
  The exponential growth of question answering (QA) has made it an indispensable topic in any Natural Language Processing (NLP) course. We introduce UKP-SQuARE as a platform for QA education. Students can run, compare, and analyze various QA models from different perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T11:29:04Z)
• Quiz-based Knowledge Tracing [61.9152637457605]
  Knowledge tracing aims to assess individuals' evolving knowledge states according to their learning interactions. QKT achieves state-of-the-art performance compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T12:48:42Z)
• Question Personalization in an Intelligent Tutoring System [5.644357169513361]
  We show that generating versions of the questions suitable for students at different levels of subject proficiency improves student learning gains. This insight demonstrates that the linguistic realization of questions in an ITS affects the learning outcomes for students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T15:23:51Z)
• ProtoTransformer: A Meta-Learning Approach to Providing Student Feedback [54.142719510638614]
  In this paper, we frame the problem of providing feedback as few-shot classification. A meta-learner adapts to give feedback to student code on a new programming question from just a few examples by instructors. Our approach was successfully deployed to deliver feedback to 16,000 student exam-solutions in a programming course offered by a tier 1 university.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T22:41:28Z)
• Comparative Study of Learning Outcomes for Online Learning Platforms [47.5164159412965]
  Personalization and active learning are key aspects to successful learning. We run a comparative head-to-head study of learning outcomes for two popular online learning platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T20:40:24Z)
• Neural Multi-Task Learning for Teacher Question Detection in Online Classrooms [50.19997675066203]
  We build an end-to-end neural framework that automatically detects questions from teachers' audio recordings. By incorporating multi-task learning techniques, we are able to strengthen the understanding of semantic relations among different types of questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-16T02:17:04Z)
• Redesign of web-based exam for knowledge evaluation in Advanced Mathematics for pharmaceutical students based on analysis of the results [0.0]
  This paper presents a detailed analysis of the implemented electronic test for knowledge evaluation of the students. The questions included in the test and the respective answers given by the students are estimated and analysed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T16:20:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.