An Interpretable Graph-based Mapping of Trustworthy Machine Learning Research

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.06591v1
• Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 23:25:07 GMT
• Title: An Interpretable Graph-based Mapping of Trustworthy Machine Learning Research
• Authors: Noemi Derzsy, Subhabrata Majumdar, Rajat Malik
• Abstract summary: We build a co-occurrence network of words using a web-scraped corpus of more than 7,000 peer-reviewed recent ML papers. We use community detection to obtain semantic clusters of words in this network that can infer relative positions of TwML topics.
• Score: 3.222802562733787
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: There is an increasing interest in ensuring machine learning (ML) frameworks behave in a socially responsible manner and are deemed trustworthy. Although considerable progress has been made in the field of Trustworthy ML (TwML) in the recent past, much of the current characterization of this progress is qualitative. Consequently, decisions about how to address issues of trustworthiness and future research goals are often left to the interested researcher. In this paper, we present the first quantitative approach to characterize the comprehension of TwML research. We build a co-occurrence network of words using a web-scraped corpus of more than 7,000 peer-reviewed recent ML papers -- consisting of papers both related and unrelated to TwML. We use community detection to obtain semantic clusters of words in this network that can infer relative positions of TwML topics. We propose an innovative fingerprinting algorithm to obtain probabilistic similarity scores for individual words, then combine them to give a paper-level relevance score. The outcomes of our analysis inform a number of interesting insights on advancing the field of TwML research.

Related papers

• Benchmarking and Confidence Evaluation of LALMs For Temporal Reasoning [30.308743810639758]
  Large audio language models (LALMs) have to be evaluated on reasoning related tasks which are different from traditional classification or generation tasks.<n>We benchmark open-source LALMs and observe that they are consistently behind human capabilities on the tasks in the TREA dataset.<n>Our analysis shows that the accuracy and uncertainty metrics are not necessarily correlated and thus, points to a need for wholesome evaluation of LALMs for high-stakes applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T13:46:35Z)
• Can LLMs Generate Tabular Summaries of Science Papers? Rethinking the Evaluation Protocol [83.90769864167301]
  Literature review tables are essential for summarizing and comparing collections of scientific papers. We explore the task of generating tables that best fulfill a user's informational needs given a collection of scientific papers. Our contributions focus on three key challenges encountered in real-world use: (i) User prompts are often under-specified; (ii) Retrieved candidate papers frequently contain irrelevant content; and (iii) Task evaluation should move beyond shallow text similarity techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T14:52:28Z)
• How do Large Language Models Understand Relevance? A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspective [64.00022624183781]
  Large language models (LLMs) can assess relevance and support information retrieval (IR) tasks. We investigate how different LLM modules contribute to relevance judgment through the lens of mechanistic interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:14:55Z)
• MCiteBench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Citation Text Generation in MLLMs [31.793037002996257]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have advanced in integrating diverse modalities but frequently suffer from hallucination. Existing work primarily focuses on generating citations for text-only content, overlooking the challenges and opportunities of multimodal contexts. We introduce MCiteBench, the first benchmark designed to evaluate and analyze the multimodal citation text generation ability of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T13:12:39Z)
• Towards Text-Image Interleaved Retrieval [49.96332254241075]
  We introduce the text-image interleaved retrieval (TIIR) task, where the query and document are interleaved text-image sequences. We construct a TIIR benchmark based on naturally interleaved wikiHow tutorials, where a specific pipeline is designed to generate interleaved queries. We propose a novel Matryoshka Multimodal Embedder (MME), which compresses the number of visual tokens at different granularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T12:00:47Z)
• On the Statistical Significance with Relevance Assessments of Large Language Models [2.9180406633632523]
  We use Large Language Models for labelling relevance of documents for building new retrieval test collections. Our results show that LLM judgements detect most of the significant differences while maintaining acceptable numbers of false positives. Our work represents a step forward in the evaluation of statistical testing results provided by LLM judgements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T11:19:35Z)
• A Bayesian Approach to Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Authorship Attribution [57.309390098903]
  Authorship attribution aims to identify the origin or author of a document. Large Language Models (LLMs) with their deep reasoning capabilities and ability to maintain long-range textual associations offer a promising alternative. Our results on the IMDb and blog datasets show an impressive 85% accuracy in one-shot authorship classification across ten authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T04:14:23Z)
• Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information [87.3175915185287]
  "Context is Key" (CiK) is a time series forecasting benchmark that pairs numerical data with diverse types of carefully crafted textual context. We evaluate a range of approaches, including statistical models, time series foundation models, and LLM-based forecasters. Our experiments highlight the importance of incorporating contextual information, demonstrate surprising performance when using LLM-based forecasting models, and also reveal some of their critical shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:56:08Z)
• Paired Completion: Flexible Quantification of Issue-framing at Scale with LLMs [0.41436032949434404]
  We develop and rigorously evaluate new detection methods for issue framing and narrative analysis within large text datasets. We show that issue framing can be reliably and efficiently detected in large corpora with only a few examples of either perspective on a given issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T07:14:15Z)
• Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning: Synthesis and Opportunities [60.34182805429511]
  Retrieval-enhancement can be extended to a broader spectrum of machine learning (ML) This work introduces a formal framework of this paradigm, Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning (REML), by synthesizing the literature in various domains in ML with consistent notations which is missing from the current literature. The goal of this work is to equip researchers across various disciplines with a comprehensive, formally structured framework of retrieval-enhanced models, thereby fostering interdisciplinary future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T20:01:21Z)
• MM-SpuBench: Towards Better Understanding of Spurious Biases in Multimodal LLMs [38.93090238335506]
  Spurious bias, a tendency to use spurious correlations between non-essential input attributes and target variables for predictions, has revealed a severe pitfall in deep learning models trained on single modality data. We introduce MM-SpuBench, a comprehensive visual question-answering (VQA) benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' reliance on nine distinct categories of spurious correlations. Our findings illuminate the persistence of the reliance on spurious correlations from these models and underscore the urge for new methodologies to mitigate spurious biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T20:29:16Z)
• RelevAI-Reviewer: A Benchmark on AI Reviewers for Survey Paper Relevance [0.8089605035945486]
  We propose RelevAI-Reviewer, an automatic system that conceptualizes the task of survey paper review as a classification problem. We introduce a novel dataset comprised of 25,164 instances. Each instance contains one prompt and four candidate papers, each varying in relevance to the prompt. We develop a machine learning (ML) model capable of determining the relevance of each paper and identifying the most pertinent one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T06:42:32Z)
• SEED-Bench-2: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models [67.28089415198338]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generating not only texts but also images given interleaved multimodal inputs. SEED-Bench-2 comprises 24K multiple-choice questions with accurate human annotations, which spans 27 dimensions. We evaluate the performance of 23 prominent open-source MLLMs and summarize valuable observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-28T05:53:55Z)
• Interpretability of Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Future Prospects [21.68362950922772]
  The proliferation of machine learning (ML) has drawn unprecedented interest in the study of various multimedia contents. The black-box nature of contemporary ML, especially in deep neural networks (DNNs), has posed a primary challenge for ML-based representation learning. This paper presents a survey on recent advances and future prospects on interpretability of ML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-30T17:31:29Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)
• Memory-Based Optimization Methods for Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning and Personalized Federated Learning [56.17603785248675]
  Model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) has become a popular research area. Existing MAML algorithms rely on the episode' idea by sampling a few tasks and data points to update the meta-model at each iteration. This paper proposes memory-based algorithms for MAML that converge with vanishing error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T08:47:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.