DirectQE: Direct Pretraining for Machine Translation Quality Estimation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.07149v1
• Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 06:18:49 GMT
• Title: DirectQE: Direct Pretraining for Machine Translation Quality Estimation
• Authors: Qu Cui, Shujian Huang, Jiahuan Li, Xiang Geng, Zaixiang Zheng, Guoping Huang, Jiajun Chen
• Abstract summary: We argue that there are gaps between the predictor and the estimator in both data quality and training objectives. We propose a novel framework called DirectQE that provides a direct pretraining for QE tasks.
• Score: 41.187833219223336
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine Translation Quality Estimation (QE) is a task of predicting the quality of machine translations without relying on any reference. Recently, the predictor-estimator framework trains the predictor as a feature extractor, which leverages the extra parallel corpora without QE labels, achieving promising QE performance. However, we argue that there are gaps between the predictor and the estimator in both data quality and training objectives, which preclude QE models from benefiting from a large number of parallel corpora more directly. We propose a novel framework called DirectQE that provides a direct pretraining for QE tasks. In DirectQE, a generator is trained to produce pseudo data that is closer to the real QE data, and a detector is pretrained on these data with novel objectives that are akin to the QE task. Experiments on widely used benchmarks show that DirectQE outperforms existing methods, without using any pretraining models such as BERT. We also give extensive analyses showing how fixing the two gaps contributes to our improvements.

Related papers

• Quality Estimation with $k$-nearest Neighbors and Automatic Evaluation for Model-specific Quality Estimation [14.405862891194344]
  We propose a model-specific, unsupervised QE approach, termed $k$NN-QE, that extracts information from the MT model's training data using $k$-nearest neighbors. Measuring the performance of model-specific QE is not straightforward, since they provide quality scores on their own MT output. We propose an automatic evaluation method that uses quality scores from reference-based metrics as gold standard instead of human-generated ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-27T23:52:51Z)
• Improving Machine Translation with Human Feedback: An Exploration of Quality Estimation as a Reward Model [75.66013048128302]
  In this work, we investigate the potential of employing the QE model as the reward model to predict human preferences for feedback training. We first identify the overoptimization problem during QE-based feedback training, manifested as an increase in reward while translation quality declines. To address the problem, we adopt a simple yet effective method that uses rules to detect the incorrect translations and assigns a penalty term to the reward scores of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T16:07:43Z)
• SQUARE: Automatic Question Answering Evaluation using Multiple Positive and Negative References [73.67707138779245]
  We propose a new evaluation metric: SQuArE (Sentence-level QUestion AnsweRing Evaluation) We evaluate SQuArE on both sentence-level extractive (Answer Selection) and generative (GenQA) QA systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T16:51:30Z)
• QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarization [116.56171113972944]
  We show that carefully choosing the components of a QA-based metric is critical to performance. Our solution improves upon the best-performing entailment-based metric and achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T00:38:35Z)
• A New Tool for Efficiently Generating Quality Estimation Datasets [1.1374578778690623]
  Building data for quality estimation (QE) training is expensive and requires significant human labor. We propose a fully automatic pseudo-QE dataset generation tool that generates QE datasets by receiving only monolingual or parallel corpus as the input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-01T08:37:30Z)
• MDQE: A More Accurate Direct Pretraining for Machine Translation Quality Estimation [4.416484585765028]
  We argue that there are still gaps between the predictor and the estimator in both data quality and training objectives. We propose a novel framework that provides a more accurate direct pretraining for QE tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-24T09:48:37Z)
• Knowledge Distillation for Quality Estimation [79.51452598302934]
  Quality Estimation (QE) is the task of automatically predicting Machine Translation quality in the absence of reference translations. Recent success in QE stems from the use of multilingual pre-trained representations, where very large models lead to impressive results. We show that this approach, in combination with data augmentation, leads to light-weight QE models that perform competitively with distilled pre-trained representations with 8x fewer parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T12:36:21Z)
• Ensemble-based Transfer Learning for Low-resource Machine Translation Quality Estimation [1.7188280334580195]
  We focus on the Sentence-Level QE Shared Task of the Fifth Conference on Machine Translation (WMT20) We propose an ensemble-based predictor-estimator QE model with transfer learning to overcome such QE data scarcity challenge. We achieve the best performance on the ensemble model combining the models pretrained by individual languages as well as different levels of parallel trained corpus with a Pearson's correlation of 0.298.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-17T06:02:17Z)
• Harvesting and Refining Question-Answer Pairs for Unsupervised QA [95.9105154311491]
  We introduce two approaches to improve unsupervised Question Answering (QA) First, we harvest lexically and syntactically divergent questions from Wikipedia to automatically construct a corpus of question-answer pairs (named as RefQA) Second, we take advantage of the QA model to extract more appropriate answers, which iteratively refines data over RefQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T15:56:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.