Copyright in Generative Deep Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.09266v1
• Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 17:22:47 GMT
• Title: Copyright in Generative Deep Learning
• Authors: Giorgio Franceschelli and Mirco Musolesi
• Abstract summary: We consider a set of key questions in the area of generative deep learning for the arts. We try to answer these questions considering the law in force in both US and EU.
• Score: 3.689181056530984
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine-generated artworks are now part of the contemporary art scene: they are attracting significant investments and they are presented in exhibitions together with those created by human artists. These artworks are mainly based on generative deep learning techniques. Also given their success, several legal problems arise when working with these techniques. In this article we consider a set of key questions in the area of generative deep learning for the arts. Is it possible to use copyrighted works as training set for generative models? How do we legally store their copies in order to perform the training process? And then, who (if someone) will own the copyright on the generated data? We try to answer these questions considering the law in force in both US and EU and the future alternatives, trying to define a set of guidelines for artists and developers working on deep learning generated art.

Related papers

• How Many Van Goghs Does It Take to Van Gogh? Finding the Imitation Threshold [50.33428591760124]
  We study the relationship between a concept's frequency in the training dataset and the ability of a model to imitate it. We propose an efficient approach that estimates the imitation threshold without incurring the colossal cost of training multiple models from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T06:28:14Z)
• At the edge of a generative cultural precipice [1.688134675717698]
  Since NFTs and large generative models have been publicly available, artists have seen their jobs threatened and stolen. generative models are trained using human-produced content to better guide the style and themes they can produce. Inspired by recent work in generative models, we wish to tell a cautionary tale and ask what will happen to the visual arts if generative models continue on the path to be trained solely on generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T23:26:24Z)
• ©Plug-in Authorization for Human Content Copyright Protection in Text-to-Image Model [71.47762442337948]
  State-of-the-art models create high-quality content without crediting original creators. We propose the copyright Plug-in Authorization framework, introducing three operations: addition, extraction, and combination. Extraction allows creators to reclaim copyright from infringing models, and combination enables users to merge different copyright plug-ins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T07:48:00Z)
• Rethinking Artistic Copyright Infringements in the Era of Text-to-Image Generative Models [47.19481598385283]
  ArtSavant is a tool to determine the unique style of an artist by comparing it to a reference dataset of works from WikiArt. We then perform a large-scale empirical study to provide quantitative insight on the prevalence of artistic style copying across 3 popular text-to-image generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T17:59:43Z)
• Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Technical Perspective [58.84343394349887]
  Generative AI has witnessed rapid advancement in recent years, expanding their capabilities to create synthesized content such as text, images, audio, and code. The high fidelity and authenticity of contents generated by these Deep Generative Models (DGMs) have sparked significant copyright concerns. This work delves into this issue by providing a comprehensive overview of copyright protection from a technical perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T04:00:33Z)
• Foregrounding Artist Opinions: A Survey Study on Transparency, Ownership, and Fairness in AI Generative Art [0.0]
  Generative AI tools are used to create art-like outputs and sometimes aid in the creative process. We surveyed 459 artists to investigate tension between artists' opinions on Generative AI art's potential utility and harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-27T20:22:46Z)
• A Dataset and Benchmark for Copyright Infringement Unlearning from Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [52.49582606341111]
  Copyright law confers creators the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and monetize their creative works. Recent progress in text-to-image generation has introduced formidable challenges to copyright enforcement. We introduce a novel pipeline that harmonizes CLIP, ChatGPT, and diffusion models to curate a dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T11:14:01Z)
• Studying Artist Sentiments around AI-generated Artwork [25.02527831382343]
  We interviewed 7 artists and analyzed public posts from artists on social media platforms Reddit, Twitter and Artstation. We report artists' main concerns and hopes around AI-generated artwork, informing a way forward for inclusive development of these tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T22:44:02Z)
• Measuring the Success of Diffusion Models at Imitating Human Artists [7.007492782620398]
  We show how to measure a model's ability to imitate specific artists. We use Contrastive Language-Image Pretrained (CLIP) encoders to classify images in a zero-shot fashion. We also show that a sample of the artist's work can be matched to these imitation images with a high degree of statistical reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-08T18:31:25Z)
• Foundation Models and Fair Use [96.04664748698103]
  In the U.S. and other countries, copyrighted content may be used to build foundation models without incurring liability due to the fair use doctrine. In this work, we survey the potential risks of developing and deploying foundation models based on copyrighted content. We discuss technical mitigations that can help foundation models stay in line with fair use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:58:40Z)
• Can There be Art Without an Artist? [1.2691047660244335]
  Generative AI based art has proliferated in the past year. In this paper, we explore how Generative Models have impacted artistry. We posit that if deployed responsibly, AI generative models have the possibility of being a positive, new modality in art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-16T01:23:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.