A Review on Trust in Human-Robot Interaction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.10045v1
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 21:50:03 GMT
- Title: A Review on Trust in Human-Robot Interaction
- Authors: Zahra Rezaei Khavas
- Abstract summary: A new field of research in human-robot interaction, namely human-robot trust, is emerging.
This paper reviews the past works on human-robot trust based on the research topics and discuss selected trends in this field.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Due to agile developments in the field of robotics and human-robot
interaction, prospective robotic agents are intended to play the role of
teammates and partner with humans to perform operations, rather than tools that
are replacing humans helping humans in a specific task. this notion of
partnering with robots raises new challenges for human-robot interaction (HRI),
which gives rise to a new field of research in HRI, namely human-robot trust.
Where humans and robots are working as partners, the performance of the work
can be diminished if humans do not trust robots appropriately. Considering the
impact of human-robot trust observed in different HRI fields, many researchers
have investigated the field of human-robot trust and examined various concerns
related to human-robot trust. In this work, we review the past works on
human-robot trust based on the research topics and discuss selected trends in
this field. Based on these reviews, we finally propose some ideas and areas of
potential future research at the end of this paper.
Related papers
- Human Reactions to Incorrect Answers from Robots [0.0]
The study systematically studies how trust dynamics and system design are affected by human responses to robot failures.
Results show that participants' trust in robotic technologies increased significantly when robots acknowledged their errors or limitations.
The study advances the science of human-robot interaction and promotes a wider adoption of robotic technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T11:00:11Z) - Common (good) practices measuring trust in HRI [55.2480439325792]
Trust in robots is widely believed to be imperative for the adoption of robots into people's daily lives.
Researchers have been exploring how people trust robot in different ways.
Most roboticists agree that insufficient levels of trust lead to a risk of disengagement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-20T20:52:10Z) - Habitat 3.0: A Co-Habitat for Humans, Avatars and Robots [119.55240471433302]
Habitat 3.0 is a simulation platform for studying collaborative human-robot tasks in home environments.
It addresses challenges in modeling complex deformable bodies and diversity in appearance and motion.
Human-in-the-loop infrastructure enables real human interaction with simulated robots via mouse/keyboard or a VR interface.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T17:29:17Z) - Improved Trust in Human-Robot Collaboration with ChatGPT [1.086544864007391]
The paper explores the impact of ChatGPT on trust in a human-robot collaboration assembly task.
A human-subject experiment showed that incorporating ChatGPT in robots significantly increased trust in human-robot collaboration.
The findings of this study have significant implications for the development of human-robot collaboration systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-25T02:48:35Z) - The dynamic nature of trust: Trust in Human-Robot Interaction revisited [0.38233569758620045]
Socially assistive robots (SARs) assist humans in the real world.
Risk introduces an element of trust, so understanding human trust in the robot is imperative.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-08T19:20:11Z) - Evaluation of Performance-Trust vs Moral-Trust Violation in 3D
Environment [1.4502611532302039]
We aim to design an experiment to investigate the consequences of performance-trust violation and moral-trust violation in a search and rescue scenario.
We want to see if two similar robot failures, one caused by a performance-trust violation and the other by a moral-trust violation have distinct effects on human trust.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T17:27:09Z) - The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS-TRAITS [64.77385130665128]
The aim of this workshop is to foster the exchange of insights on past and ongoing research towards effective and long-lasting collaborations between humans and robots.
We particularly focus on AI techniques required to implement autonomous and proactive interactions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-07T11:12:45Z) - The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS-TRAITS [65.60507052509406]
The aim of this workshop is to give researchers from academia and industry the possibility to discuss the inter-and multi-disciplinary nature of the relationships between people and robots.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-23T16:52:12Z) - Show Me What You Can Do: Capability Calibration on Reachable Workspace
for Human-Robot Collaboration [83.4081612443128]
We show that a short calibration using REMP can effectively bridge the gap between what a non-expert user thinks a robot can reach and the ground-truth.
We show that this calibration procedure not only results in better user perception, but also promotes more efficient human-robot collaborations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-06T09:14:30Z) - Human Grasp Classification for Reactive Human-to-Robot Handovers [50.91803283297065]
We propose an approach for human-to-robot handovers in which the robot meets the human halfway.
We collect a human grasp dataset which covers typical ways of holding objects with various hand shapes and poses.
We present a planning and execution approach that takes the object from the human hand according to the detected grasp and hand position.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-12T19:58:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.