A General Theory for the Evolution of Application Models -- Full version
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11308v1
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 17:24:35 GMT
- Title: A General Theory for the Evolution of Application Models -- Full version
- Abstract summary: This theory makes a distinction between the underlying information structure at the conceptual level, its evolution on the one hand, and the description and semantics of operations on the information structure and its population on the other hand.
Main issues within this theory are object typing, type relatedness and identification of objects.
In this general theory, the underlying data model is a parameter, making the theory applicable for a wide range of modelling techniques.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In this article we focus on evolving information systems. First a
delimitation of the concept of evolution is provided, resulting in a first
attempt to a general theory for such evolutions. The theory makes a distinction
between the underlying information structure at the conceptual level, its
evolution on the one hand, and the description and semantics of operations on
the information structure and its population on the other hand. Main issues
within this theory are object typing, type relatedness and identification of
objects. In terms of these concepts, we propose some axioms on the
well-formedness of evolution. In this general theory, the underlying data model
is a parameter, making the theory applicable for a wide range of modelling
techniques, including object-role modelling and object oriented techniques.
Related papers
- From Approximation to Emergence: A Theory of Deep Learning [5.863264019032883]
From Approximation to Emergence is a unified, proof-oriented account of modern deep learning theory.<n>Written for researchers, graduate students, and mathematically trained practitioners, it offers a rigorous map of deep learning theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-01T17:26:19Z) - Evolutionary Data Theory: On the Similarities between Data Problems and Evolutionary Games [0.0]
It is shown that this evolutionary interpretation remains universally meaningful, by proving convergence to a unique rest point.<n>A basic example of multi-objective optimization is shown as well as a related distribution problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-26T08:24:51Z) - There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learning [62.690977616250954]
We make the case that a scientific theory of deep learning is emerging.<n>We identify five growing bodies of work that point toward such a theory.<n>We argue that the emerging theory is best thought of as a mechanics of the learning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-23T13:58:12Z) - Foundations and Frontiers of Graph Learning Theory [81.39078977407719]
Recent advancements in graph learning have revolutionized the way to understand and analyze data with complex structures.
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), i.e. neural network architectures designed for learning graph representations, have become a popular paradigm.
This article provides a comprehensive summary of the theoretical foundations and breakthroughs concerning the approximation and learning behaviors intrinsic to prevalent graph learning models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-03T14:07:41Z) - Learning Discrete Concepts in Latent Hierarchical Models [73.01229236386148]
Learning concepts from natural high-dimensional data holds potential in building human-aligned and interpretable machine learning models.
We formalize concepts as discrete latent causal variables that are related via a hierarchical causal model.
We substantiate our theoretical claims with synthetic data experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-01T18:01:03Z) - An Axiomatic Approach to Model-Agnostic Concept Explanations [67.84000759813435]
We propose an approach to concept explanations that satisfy three natural axioms: linearity, recursivity, and similarity.
We then establish connections with previous concept explanation methods, offering insight into their varying semantic meanings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T20:53:35Z) - The Generative Programs Framework [0.0]
We argue that any quantitative physical theory can be represented in the form of a generative program.
We suggest that these graphs can be interpreted as encoding relations of ontological priority,' and that ontological priority is a suitable generalisation of causation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-21T00:57:05Z) - On the Joint Interaction of Models, Data, and Features [82.60073661644435]
We introduce a new tool, the interaction tensor, for empirically analyzing the interaction between data and model through features.
Based on these observations, we propose a conceptual framework for feature learning.
Under this framework, the expected accuracy for a single hypothesis and agreement for a pair of hypotheses can both be derived in closed-form.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T21:35:26Z) - A Category-theoretical Meta-analysis of Definitions of Disentanglement [97.34033555407403]
Disentangling the factors of variation in data is a fundamental concept in machine learning.
This paper presents a meta-analysis of existing definitions of disentanglement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-11T15:24:20Z) - Brain Principles Programming [0.3867363075280543]
Brain Principles Programming, BPP, is the formalization of universal mechanisms (principles) of the brain's work with information.
The paper uses mathematical models and algorithms of the following theories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-13T13:41:44Z) - Towards a Theory of Evolution as Multilevel Learning [0.0]
We apply the theory of learning to physically renormalizable systems in an attempt to develop a theory of biological evolution, including the origin of life, as multilevel learning.
We formulate seven fundamental principles of evolution that appear to be necessary and sufficient to render a universe observable.
We show that these principles entail the major features of biological evolution, including replication and natural selection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-27T17:21:16Z) - Formalising Concepts as Grounded Abstractions [68.24080871981869]
This report shows how representation learning can be used to induce concepts from raw data.
The main technical goal of this report is to show how techniques from representation learning can be married with a lattice-theoretic formulation of conceptual spaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-13T15:22:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.