Tiplines to Combat Misinformation on Encrypted Platforms: A Case Study
of the 2019 Indian Election on WhatsApp
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04726v1
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 23:08:47 GMT
- Title: Tiplines to Combat Misinformation on Encrypted Platforms: A Case Study
of the 2019 Indian Election on WhatsApp
- Authors: Ashkan Kazemi, Kiran Garimella, Gautam Kishore Shahi, Devin Gaffney,
Scott A. Hale
- Abstract summary: We analyze the usefulness of a crowd-sourced system on WhatsApp through which users can submit "tips" containing messages they want fact-checked.
We compare the tips sent to a WhatsApp tipline run during the 2019 Indian national elections with the messages circulating in large, public groups on WhatsApp.
We find that tiplines are a very useful lens into WhatsApp conversations.
- Score: 5.342552155591148
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: WhatsApp is a popular chat application used by over 2 billion users
worldwide. However, due to end-to-end encryption, there is currently no easy
way to fact-check content on WhatsApp at scale. In this paper, we analyze the
usefulness of a crowd-sourced system on WhatsApp through which users can submit
"tips" containing messages they want fact-checked. We compare the tips sent to
a WhatsApp tipline run during the 2019 Indian national elections with the
messages circulating in large, public groups on WhatsApp and other social media
platforms during the same period. We find that tiplines are a very useful lens
into WhatsApp conversations: a significant fraction of messages and images sent
to the tipline match with the content being shared on public WhatsApp groups
and other social media. Our analysis also shows that tiplines cover the most
popular content well, and a majority of such content is often shared to the
tipline before appearing in large, public WhatsApp groups. Overall, the
analysis suggests tiplines can be an effective source for discovering content
to fact-check.
Related papers
- WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wild [88.05964311416717]
WildChat is a corpus of 1 million user-ChatGPT conversations, which consists of over 2.5 million interaction turns.
In addition to timestamped chat transcripts, we enrich the dataset with demographic data, including state, country, and hashed IP addresses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T17:00:02Z) - WhatsApp Explorer: A Data Donation Tool To Facilitate Research on WhatsApp [1.2507543279181124]
This paper introduces WhatsApp Explorer, a tool designed to enable WhatsApp data collection on a large scale.
We discuss protocols for data collection, including potential sampling approaches, and explain why our tool (and adjoining protocol) arguably allow researchers to collect WhatsApp data in an ethical and legal manner, at scale.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-29T13:30:29Z) - TGDataset: a Collection of Over One Hundred Thousand Telegram Channels [69.22187804798162]
This paper presents the TGDataset, a new dataset that includes 120,979 Telegram channels and over 400 million messages.
We analyze the languages spoken within our dataset and the topic covered by English channels.
In addition to the raw dataset, we released the scripts we used to analyze the dataset and the list of channels belonging to the network of a new conspiracy theory called Sabmyk.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-09T15:42:38Z) - Uncovering the Dark Side of Telegram: Fakes, Clones, Scams, and
Conspiracy Movements [67.39353554498636]
We perform a large-scale analysis of Telegram by collecting 35,382 different channels and over 130,000,000 messages.
We find some of the infamous activities also present on privacy-preserving services of the Dark Web, such as carding.
We propose a machine learning model that is able to identify fake channels with an accuracy of 86%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-26T14:53:31Z) - A Hierarchical Network-Oriented Analysis of User Participation in
Misinformation Spread on WhatsApp [0.9774299772405469]
We present a hierarchical network-oriented characterization of the users engaged in misinformation spread on WhatsApp.
Our study offers valuable insights into how WhatsApp users leverage the underlying network connecting different groups to gain large reach in the spread of misinformation on the platform.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-22T00:00:02Z) - Jettisoning Junk Messaging in the Era of End-to-End Encryption: A Case
Study of WhatsApp [8.463390032361591]
We study junk messaging on a multilingual dataset of 2.6M messages sent to 5K public WhatsApp groups in India.
We find that nearly 1 in 10 messages is unwanted content sent by junk senders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-08T15:52:46Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - A First Look at COVID-19 Messages on WhatsApp in Pakistan [6.336355456383468]
COVID-19 has prompted extensive online discussions, creating an infodemic' on social media platforms such as WhatsApp and Twitter.
We present the first analysis of COVID-19 discourse on public WhatsApp groups from Pakistan.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-18T07:56:24Z) - Emerging App Issue Identification via Online Joint Sentiment-Topic
Tracing [66.57888248681303]
We propose a novel emerging issue detection approach named MERIT.
Based on the AOBST model, we infer the topics negatively reflected in user reviews for one app version.
Experiments on popular apps from Google Play and Apple's App Store demonstrate the effectiveness of MERIT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-23T06:34:05Z) - Can WhatsApp Benefit from Debunked Fact-Checked Stories to Reduce
Misinformation? [3.116035935327534]
We observe that misinformation has been largely shared on WhatsApp public groups even after they were already fact-checked by popular fact-checking agencies.
This represents a significant portion of misinformation spread in both Brazil and India in the groups analyzed.
We propose an architecture that could be implemented by WhatsApp to counter such misinformation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-03T18:28:57Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.