Uncovering the Dark Side of Telegram: Fakes, Clones, Scams, and Conspiracy Movements

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.13530v2
• Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:41:13 GMT
• Title: Uncovering the Dark Side of Telegram: Fakes, Clones, Scams, and Conspiracy Movements
• Authors: Massimo La Morgia, Alessandro Mei, Alberto Maria Mongardini, Jie Wu
• Abstract summary: We perform a large-scale analysis of Telegram by collecting 35,382 different channels and over 130,000,000 messages. We find some of the infamous activities also present on privacy-preserving services of the Dark Web, such as carding. We propose a machine learning model that is able to identify fake channels with an accuracy of 86%.
• Score: 67.39353554498636
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Telegram is one of the most used instant messaging apps worldwide. Some of its success lies in providing high privacy protection and social network features like the channels -- virtual rooms in which only the admins can post and broadcast messages to all its subscribers. However, these same features contributed to the emergence of borderline activities and, as is common with Online Social Networks, the heavy presence of fake accounts. Telegram started to address these issues by introducing the verified and scam marks for the channels. Unfortunately, the problem is far from being solved. In this work, we perform a large-scale analysis of Telegram by collecting 35,382 different channels and over 130,000,000 messages. We study the channels that Telegram marks as verified or scam, highlighting analogies and differences. Then, we move to the unmarked channels. Here, we find some of the infamous activities also present on privacy-preserving services of the Dark Web, such as carding, sharing of illegal adult and copyright protected content. In addition, we identify and analyze two other types of channels: the clones and the fakes. Clones are channels that publish the exact content of another channel to gain subscribers and promote services. Instead, fakes are channels that attempt to impersonate celebrities or well-known services. Fakes are hard to identify even by the most advanced users. To detect the fake channels automatically, we propose a machine learning model that is able to identify them with an accuracy of 86%. Lastly, we study Sabmyk, a conspiracy theory that exploited fakes and clones to spread quickly on the platform reaching over 1,000,000 users.

Related papers

• Characterizing and Detecting Propaganda-Spreading Accounts on Telegram [7.759087666892532]
  Information-based attacks on social media, such as disinformation campaigns and propaganda, are emerging cybersecurity threats. We propose a novel mechanism for detecting propaganda that capitalizes on the relationship between legitimate user messages and propaganda replies. Our method is faster, cheaper, and has a detection rate (97.6%) 11.6 percentage points higher than human moderators after seeing only one message from an account.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T11:07:27Z)
• The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels and their Profit Model [50.80312055220701]
  We discover that conspiracy channels can be clustered into four distinct communities comprising over 17,000 channels. We find conspiracy theorists leverage e-commerce platforms to sell questionable products or lucratively promote them through affiliate links. We conclude that this business involves hundreds of thousands of donors and generates a turnover of almost $66 million.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T16:25:52Z)
• TGDataset: a Collection of Over One Hundred Thousand Telegram Channels [69.22187804798162]
  This paper presents the TGDataset, a new dataset that includes 120,979 Telegram channels and over 400 million messages. We analyze the languages spoken within our dataset and the topic covered by English channels. In addition to the raw dataset, we released the scripts we used to analyze the dataset and the list of channels belonging to the network of a new conspiracy theory called Sabmyk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T15:42:38Z)
• Manipulating Twitter Through Deletions [64.33261764633504]
  Research into influence campaigns on Twitter has mostly relied on identifying malicious activities from tweets obtained via public APIs. Here, we provide the first exhaustive, large-scale analysis of anomalous deletion patterns involving more than a billion deletions by over 11 million accounts. We find that a small fraction of accounts delete a large number of tweets daily. First, limits on tweet volume are circumvented, allowing certain accounts to flood the network with over 26 thousand daily tweets. Second, coordinated networks of accounts engage in repetitive likes and unlikes of content that is eventually deleted, which can manipulate ranking algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T20:07:08Z)
• Watch Those Words: Video Falsification Detection Using Word-Conditioned Facial Motion [82.06128362686445]
  We propose a multi-modal semantic forensic approach to handle both cheapfakes and visually persuasive deepfakes. We leverage the idea of attribution to learn person-specific biometric patterns that distinguish a given speaker from others. Unlike existing person-specific approaches, our method is also effective against attacks that focus on lip manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T01:57:04Z)
• Sockpuppet Detection: a Telegram case study [0.5620334754517148]
  In Online Social Networks (OSN) numerous are the cases in which users create multiple accounts that publicly seem to belong to different people but are actually fake identities of the same person. These fictitious characters can be exploited to carry out abusive behaviors such as manipulating opinions, spreading fake news and disturbing other users. In our work we focus on Telegram, a wide-spread instant messaging application, often known for its exploitation by members of organized crime and terrorism, and more in general for its high presence of people who have offensive behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-22T19:28:10Z)
• User Preference-aware Fake News Detection [61.86175081368782]
  Existing fake news detection algorithms focus on mining news content for deceptive signals. We propose a new framework, UPFD, which simultaneously captures various signals from user preferences by joint content and graph modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-25T21:19:24Z)
• Charting the Landscape of Online Cryptocurrency Manipulation [6.115604209763508]
  We chart the online cryptocurrency landscape across multiple platforms. We collected a large dataset composed of more than 50M messages published by almost 7M users on Twitter, Telegram and Discord.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-28T12:19:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.