Sample-efficient Linguistic Generalizations through Program Synthesis:
Experiments with Phonology Problems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.06566v1
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 18:36:07 GMT
- Title: Sample-efficient Linguistic Generalizations through Program Synthesis:
Experiments with Phonology Problems
- Authors: Saujas Vaduguru, Aalok Sathe, Monojit Choudhury, Dipti Misra Sharma
- Abstract summary: We develop a synthesis model to learn phonology rules as programs in a domain-specific language.
We test the ability of our models to generalize from few training examples using our new dataset of problems from the Linguistics Olympiad.
- Score: 12.661592819420727
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Neural models excel at extracting statistical patterns from large amounts of
data, but struggle to learn patterns or reason about language from only a few
examples. In this paper, we ask: Can we learn explicit rules that generalize
well from only a few examples? We explore this question using program
synthesis. We develop a synthesis model to learn phonology rules as programs in
a domain-specific language. We test the ability of our models to generalize
from few training examples using our new dataset of problems from the
Linguistics Olympiad, a challenging set of tasks that require strong linguistic
reasoning ability. In addition to being highly sample-efficient, our approach
generates human-readable programs, and allows control over the generalizability
of the learnt programs.
Related papers
- Learning Mathematical Rules with Large Language Models [10.285317818397298]
We study the ability of large language models to learn specific mathematical rules such as distributivity or simplifying equations.
We present an empirical analysis of their ability to generalize these rules, as well as to reuse them in the context of word problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-22T12:51:51Z) - modeLing: A Novel Dataset for Testing Linguistic Reasoning in Language Models [23.105555180223487]
modeLing is a novel benchmark of Linguistics Olympiad-style puzzles which tests few-shot reasoning in AI systems.
We evaluate several large open source language models and GPT on our benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T18:00:59Z) - Learning Phonotactics from Linguistic Informants [54.086544221761486]
Our model iteratively selects or synthesizes a data-point according to one of a range of information-theoretic policies.
We find that the information-theoretic policies that our model uses to select items to query the informant achieve sample efficiency comparable to, or greater than, fully supervised approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-08T00:18:56Z) - Coupling Large Language Models with Logic Programming for Robust and
General Reasoning from Text [5.532477732693001]
We show that a large language model can serve as a highly effective few-shot semantically.
It can convert natural language sentences into a logical form that serves as input for answer set programs.
We demonstrate that this method achieves state-of-the-art performance on several benchmarks, including bAbI, StepGame, CLUTRR, and gSCAN.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-15T03:29:59Z) - Language Embeddings Sometimes Contain Typological Generalizations [0.0]
We train neural models for a range of natural language processing tasks on a massively multilingual dataset of Bible translations in 1295 languages.
The learned language representations are then compared to existing typological databases as well as to a novel set of quantitative syntactic and morphological features.
We conclude that some generalizations are surprisingly close to traditional features from linguistic typology, but that most models, as well as those of previous work, do not appear to have made linguistically meaningful generalizations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-19T15:09:59Z) - Towards Zero-shot Language Modeling [90.80124496312274]
We construct a neural model that is inductively biased towards learning human languages.
We infer this distribution from a sample of typologically diverse training languages.
We harness additional language-specific side information as distant supervision for held-out languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-06T23:49:18Z) - Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for
Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict.
This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data.
Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z) - Data Augmentation for Spoken Language Understanding via Pretrained
Language Models [113.56329266325902]
Training of spoken language understanding (SLU) models often faces the problem of data scarcity.
We put forward a data augmentation method using pretrained language models to boost the variability and accuracy of generated utterances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-29T04:07:12Z) - Learning Compositional Rules via Neural Program Synthesis [67.62112086708859]
We present a neuro-symbolic model which learns entire rule systems from a small set of examples.
Instead of directly predicting outputs from inputs, we train our model to induce the explicit system of rules governing a set of previously seen examples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-12T01:06:48Z) - A Simple Joint Model for Improved Contextual Neural Lemmatization [60.802451210656805]
We present a simple joint neural model for lemmatization and morphological tagging that achieves state-of-the-art results on 20 languages.
Our paper describes the model in addition to training and decoding procedures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-04-04T02:03:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.