modeLing: A Novel Dataset for Testing Linguistic Reasoning in Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.17038v1
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:00:59 GMT
- Title: modeLing: A Novel Dataset for Testing Linguistic Reasoning in Language Models
- Authors: Nathan A. Chi, Teodor Malchev, Riley Kong, Ryan A. Chi, Lucas Huang, Ethan A. Chi, R. Thomas McCoy, Dragomir Radev,
- Abstract summary: modeLing is a novel benchmark of Linguistics Olympiad-style puzzles which tests few-shot reasoning in AI systems.
We evaluate several large open source language models and GPT on our benchmark.
- Score: 23.105555180223487
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: We introduce modeLing, a novel benchmark of Linguistics Olympiad-style puzzles which tests few-shot reasoning in AI systems. Solving these puzzles necessitates inferring aspects of a language's grammatical structure from a small number of examples. Such puzzles provide a natural testbed for language models, as they require compositional generalization and few-shot inductive reasoning. Consisting solely of new puzzles written specifically for this work, modeLing has no risk of appearing in the training data of existing AI systems: this ameliorates the risk of data leakage, a potential confounder for many prior evaluations of reasoning. Evaluating several large open source language models and GPT on our benchmark, we observe non-negligible accuracy, demonstrating few-shot emergent reasoning ability which cannot merely be attributed to shallow memorization. However, imperfect model performance suggests that modeLing can be used to measure further progress in linguistic reasoning.
Related papers
- Small Language Models Like Small Vocabularies: Probing the Linguistic Abilities of Grapheme- and Phoneme-Based Baby Llamas [7.585433383340306]
We show that small models based on the Llama architecture can achieve strong linguistic performance on standard syntactic and novel lexical/phonetic benchmarks.
Our findings suggest a promising direction for creating more linguistically plausible language models that are better suited for computational studies of language acquisition and processing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T12:36:08Z) - Understanding and Mitigating Language Confusion in LLMs [76.96033035093204]
We evaluate 15 typologically diverse languages with existing and newly-created English and multilingual prompts.
We find that Llama Instruct and Mistral models exhibit high degrees of language confusion.
We find that language confusion can be partially mitigated via few-shot prompting, multilingual SFT and preference tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T17:03:51Z) - Evidence from counterfactual tasks supports emergent analogical reasoning in large language models [3.9189409002585562]
We report evidence that large language models are capable of solving a wide range of text-based analogy problems in a zero-shot manner.
Two recent commentaries have challenged these results, citing evidence from so-called counterfactual' tasks in which the standard sequence of the alphabet is arbitrarily permuted.
Here, we reply to these critiques, clarifying some misunderstandings about the test materials used in our original work, and presenting evidence that language models are also capable of generalizing to these new counterfactual task variants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-14T21:51:02Z) - APOLLO: A Simple Approach for Adaptive Pretraining of Language Models
for Logical Reasoning [73.3035118224719]
We propose APOLLO, an adaptively pretrained language model that has improved logical reasoning abilities.
APOLLO performs comparably on ReClor and outperforms baselines on LogiQA.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-19T07:40:02Z) - ALERT: Adapting Language Models to Reasoning Tasks [43.8679673685468]
ALERT is a benchmark and suite of analyses for assessing language models' reasoning ability.
ALERT provides a test bed to asses any language model on fine-grained reasoning skills.
We find that language models learn more reasoning skills during finetuning stage compared to pretraining state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-16T05:15:41Z) - Reflection of Thought: Inversely Eliciting Numerical Reasoning in
Language Models via Solving Linear Systems [42.782260686177395]
We propose a novel method to elicit and exploit the numerical reasoning knowledge hidden in pre-trained language models.
We first leverage simple numbers as anchors to probe the implicitly inferred arithmetic expressions from language models.
We transform and formulate the task as an analytically solvable linear system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-11T00:57:19Z) - Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Language [69.59943454934799]
Figurative and metaphorical language are commonplace in discourse.
It remains an open question to what extent modern language models can interpret nonliteral phrases.
We introduce Fig-QA, a Winograd-style nonliteral language understanding task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-26T23:42:22Z) - Towards Zero-shot Language Modeling [90.80124496312274]
We construct a neural model that is inductively biased towards learning human languages.
We infer this distribution from a sample of typologically diverse training languages.
We harness additional language-specific side information as distant supervision for held-out languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-06T23:49:18Z) - Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for
Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict.
This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data.
Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z) - Learning Spoken Language Representations with Neural Lattice Language
Modeling [39.50831917042577]
We propose a framework that trains neural lattice language models to provide contextualized representations for spoken language understanding tasks.
The proposed two-stage pre-training approach reduces the demands of speech data and has better efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-06T10:38:03Z) - Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structure [74.04862204427944]
We propose an information-theoretic operationalization of probing as estimating mutual information.
We evaluate on a set of ten typologically diverse languages often underrepresented in NLP research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-07T01:06:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.