Prototypical Graph Contrastive Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09645v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:45:31 GMT
• Title: Prototypical Graph Contrastive Learning
• Authors: Shuai Lin, Pan Zhou, Zi-Yuan Hu, Shuojia Wang, Ruihui Zhao, Yefeng Zheng, Liang Lin, Eric Xing, Xiaodan Liang
• Abstract summary: We propose a Prototypical Graph Contrastive Learning (PGCL) approach to mitigate the critical sampling bias issue. Specifically, PGCL models the underlying semantic structure of the graph data via clustering semantically similar graphs into the same group, and simultaneously encourages the clustering consistency for different augmentations of the same graph. For a query, PGCL further reweights its negative samples based on the distance between their prototypes (cluster centroids) and the query prototype.
• Score: 141.30842113683775
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Graph-level representations are critical in various real-world applications, such as predicting the properties of molecules. But in practice, precise graph annotations are generally very expensive and time-consuming. To address this issue, graph contrastive learning constructs instance discrimination task which pulls together positive pairs (augmentation pairs of the same graph) and pushes away negative pairs (augmentation pairs of different graphs) for unsupervised representation learning. However, since for a query, its negatives are uniformly sampled from all graphs, existing methods suffer from the critical sampling bias issue, i.e., the negatives likely having the same semantic structure with the query, leading to performance degradation. To mitigate this sampling bias issue, in this paper, we propose a Prototypical Graph Contrastive Learning (PGCL) approach. Specifically, PGCL models the underlying semantic structure of the graph data via clustering semantically similar graphs into the same group, and simultaneously encourages the clustering consistency for different augmentations of the same graph. Then given a query, it performs negative sampling via drawing the graphs from those clusters that differ from the cluster of query, which ensures the semantic difference between query and its negative samples. Moreover, for a query, PGCL further reweights its negative samples based on the distance between their prototypes (cluster centroids) and the query prototype such that those negatives having moderate prototype distance enjoy relatively large weights. This reweighting strategy is proved to be more effective than uniform sampling. Experimental results on various graph benchmarks testify the advantages of our PGCL over state-of-the-art methods.

Related papers

• Topology Reorganized Graph Contrastive Learning with Mitigating Semantic Drift [28.83750578838018]
  Graph contrastive learning (GCL) is an effective paradigm for node representation learning in graphs. To increase the diversity of the contrastive view, we propose two simple and effective global topological augmentations to compensate current GCL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T13:55:33Z)
• Generation is better than Modification: Combating High Class Homophily Variance in Graph Anomaly Detection [51.11833609431406]
  Homophily distribution differences between different classes are significantly greater than those in homophilic and heterophilic graphs. We introduce a new metric called Class Homophily Variance, which quantitatively describes this phenomenon. To mitigate its impact, we propose a novel GNN model named Homophily Edge Generation Graph Neural Network (HedGe)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T14:26:53Z)
• Graph Ranking Contrastive Learning: A Extremely Simple yet Efficient Method [17.760628718072144]
  InfoNCE uses augmentation techniques to obtain two views, where a node in one view acts as the anchor, the corresponding node in the other view serves as the positive sample, and all other nodes are regarded as negative samples. The goal is to minimize the distance between the anchor node and positive samples and maximize the distance to negative samples. Due to the lack of label information during training, InfoNCE inevitably treats samples from the same class as negative samples, leading to the issue of false negative samples. We propose GraphRank, a simple yet efficient graph contrastive learning method that addresses the problem of false negative samples
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T03:15:57Z)
• Graph Self-Contrast Representation Learning [14.519482062111507]
  We propose a novel graph self-contrast framework GraphSC. It only uses one positive and one negative sample, and chooses triplet loss as the objective. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of GraphSC against 19 other state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T15:13:48Z)
• Graph Out-of-Distribution Generalization with Controllable Data Augmentation [51.17476258673232]
  Graph Neural Network (GNN) has demonstrated extraordinary performance in classifying graph properties. Due to the selection bias of training and testing data, distribution deviation is widespread. We propose OOD calibration to measure the distribution deviation of virtual samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T13:10:27Z)
• Generating Counterfactual Hard Negative Samples for Graph Contrastive Learning [22.200011046576716]
  Graph contrastive learning is a powerful tool for unsupervised graph representation learning. Recent works usually sample negative samples from the same training batch with the positive samples, or from an external irrelevant graph. We propose a novel method to utilize textbfCounterfactual mechanism to generate artificial hard negative samples for textbfContrastive learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-01T02:19:59Z)
• Similarity-aware Positive Instance Sampling for Graph Contrastive Pre-training [82.68805025636165]
  We propose to select positive graph instances directly from existing graphs in the training set. Our selection is based on certain domain-specific pair-wise similarity measurements. Besides, we develop an adaptive node-level pre-training method to dynamically mask nodes to distribute them evenly in the graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-23T20:12:51Z)
• ACTIVE:Augmentation-Free Graph Contrastive Learning for Partial Multi-View Clustering [52.491074276133325]
  We propose an augmentation-free graph contrastive learning framework to solve the problem of partial multi-view clustering. The proposed approach elevates instance-level contrastive learning and missing data inference to the cluster-level, effectively mitigating the impact of individual missing data on clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-01T02:32:25Z)
• Contrastive Attraction and Contrastive Repulsion for Representation Learning [131.72147978462348]
  Contrastive learning (CL) methods learn data representations in a self-supervision manner, where the encoder contrasts each positive sample over multiple negative samples. Recent CL methods have achieved promising results when pretrained on large-scale datasets, such as ImageNet. We propose a doubly CL strategy that separately compares positive and negative samples within their own groups, and then proceeds with a contrast between positive and negative groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-08T17:25:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.