A Comparative Study of Online Disinformation and Offline Protests

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.11000v3
• Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 08:19:28 GMT
• Title: A Comparative Study of Online Disinformation and Offline Protests
• Authors: Jukka Ruohonen
• Abstract summary: The effects upon political protests have been unexplored. There indeed is an effect between online disinformation and offline protests, but the effect is partially meditated by political polarization. Internet shutdowns tend to decrease the counts, although, paradoxically, the absence of governmental online monitoring of social media tends to also decrease these.
• Score: 0.2538209532048867
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In early 2021 the United States Capitol in Washington was stormed during a riot and violent attack. A similar storming occurred in Brazil in 2023. Although both attacks were instances in longer sequences of events, these have provided a testimony for many observers who had claimed that online actions, including the propagation of disinformation, have offline consequences. Soon after, a number of papers have been published about the relation between online disinformation and offline violence, among other related relations. Hitherto, the effects upon political protests have been unexplored. This paper thus evaluates such effects with a time series cross-sectional sample of 125 countries in a period between 2000 and 2019. The results are mixed. Based on Bayesian multi-level regression modeling, (i) there indeed is an effect between online disinformation and offline protests, but the effect is partially meditated by political polarization. The results are clearer in a sample of countries belonging to the European Economic Area. With this sample, (ii) offline protest counts increase from online disinformation disseminated by domestic governments, political parties, and politicians as well as by foreign governments. Furthermore, (iii) Internet shutdowns tend to decrease the counts, although, paradoxically, the absence of governmental online monitoring of social media tends to also decrease these. With these results, the paper contributes to the blossoming disinformation research by modeling the impact of disinformation upon offline phenomenon. The contribution is important due to the various policy measures planned or already enacted.

Related papers

• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Physical partisan proximity outweighs online ties in predicting US voting outcomes [5.994629264812846]
  Using individual survey data and aggregated and de-identified co-location and online network data, we investigate the relationship between partisan exposure and vote choice in the US.<n>We find that partisan exposure in the physical space, as captured by co-location patterns, more accurately predicts electoral outcomes in US counties.<n>We also estimate county-level experienced partisan segregation and examine its relationship with individuals' demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T20:02:18Z)
• Sampled Datasets Risk Substantial Bias in the Identification of Political Polarization on Social Media [34.192291430580454]
  We study the structural polarization of the Polish political debate on Twitter over a 24-hour period. Large samples can be representative of the whole political discussion on a platform, but small samples consistently fail to accurately reflect the true structure of polarization online.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T12:13:29Z)
• Casual Social Media Use among the Youth: Effects on Online and Offline Political Participation [0.0]
  Previous studies suggest that social media use among the youth is correlated with online and offline political participation. This study uses three models of OLS, two-way fixed effects, and an instrumental variable approach to make causal inferences about social media use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T15:50:53Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican legislative election [55.41644538483948]
  We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day. We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• Dynamics of Cross-Platform Attention to Retracted Papers [25.179837269945015]
  Retracted papers circulate widely on social media, digital news and other websites before their official retraction. We quantify the amount and type of attention 3,851 retracted papers received over time in different online platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T01:40:20Z)
• Impact of COVID-19 Policies and Misinformation on Social Unrest [0.0]
  We focus on the interplay between social unrest (protests), health outcomes, public health orders, and misinformation in eight countries of Western Europe and four regions of the United States. We created 1-3 week forecasts of both a binary protest metric for identifying times of high protest activity and the overall protest counts over time. We found that for all regions, except Belgium, at least one feature from our various data streams was predictive of protests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T16:05:10Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Face Off: Polarized Public Opinions on Personal Face Mask Usage during the COVID-19 Pandemic [77.34726150561087]
  A series of policy shifts by various governmental bodies have been speculated to have contributed to the polarization of face masks. We propose a novel approach to accurately gauge public sentiment towards face masks in the United States during COVID-19. We find two key policy-shift events contributed to statistically significant changes in sentiment for both Republicans and Democrats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-31T18:52:41Z)
• COVID-19: The Information Warfare Paradigm Shift [0.0]
  In information warfare, recent years studies and government lines of efforts have been to engage fake news, electoral interference, and fight extremist social media as the primary combat theater in the information space. The COVID-19 pandemic generates a rebuttal of these assumptions. What we have seen with COVID-19, as an indicator, is that what is related to public health is far more powerful to swing public sentiment and create reactions within the citizenry that are trigger impact at a larger magnitude that has rippled through society in multiple directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-02T18:04:00Z)
• Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on Cyberbullying through Bayesian Trend Analysis [1.52292571922932]
  cyberbullying related public tweets (N=454,046) posted between January 1st, 2020 -- June 7th, 2020. We show that this new Bayesian method can clearly show the upward trend on cyberbullying-related tweets since mid-March 2020. Our work emphasizes a critical issue of cyberbullying and how a global crisis impacts social media abuse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-08T00:01:32Z)
• Explaining the Relationship between Internet and Democracy in Partly Free Countries Using Machine Learning Models [0.0]
  This study sheds new light on the effects of the internet on democratization in partly free countries. Internet penetration and online censorship both have a negative impact on democracy scores. Online censorship is the most important variable followed by governance index and education on democracy scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-11T02:26:37Z)
• A Dip Into a Deep Well: Online Political Advertisements, Valence, and European Electoral Campaigning [0.7106986689736826]
  The paper examines online political ads by using a dataset collected from Google's transparency reports. According to the results, most of the political ads have expressed positive sentiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-28T22:33:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.