Driver-centric Risk Object Identification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.13201v1
• Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 17:27:32 GMT
• Title: Driver-centric Risk Object Identification
• Authors: Chengxi Li, Stanley H. Chan, Yi-Ting Chen
• Abstract summary: We propose a driver-centric definition of risk, i.e., risky objects influence driver behavior. We formulate the task as a cause-effect problem and present a novel two-stage risk object identification framework. A driver-centric Risk Object Identification dataset is curated to evaluate the proposed system.
• Score: 25.85690304998681
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A massive number of traffic fatalities are due to driver errors. To reduce fatalities, developing intelligent driving systems assisting drivers to identify potential risks is in urgent need. Risky situations are generally defined based on collision prediction in existing research. However, collisions are only one type of risk in traffic scenarios. We believe a more generic definition is required. In this work, we propose a novel driver-centric definition of risk, i.e., risky objects influence driver behavior. Based on this definition, a new task called risk object identification is introduced. We formulate the task as a cause-effect problem and present a novel two-stage risk object identification framework, taking inspiration from models of situation awareness and causal inference. A driver-centric Risk Object Identification (ROI) dataset is curated to evaluate the proposed system. We demonstrate state-of-the-art risk object identification performance compared with strong baselines on the ROI dataset. In addition, we conduct extensive ablative studies to justify our design choices.

Related papers

• Risks and NLP Design: A Case Study on Procedural Document QA [52.557503571760215]
  We argue that clearer assessments of risks and harms to users will be possible when we specialize the analysis to more concrete applications and their plausible users. We conduct a risk-oriented error analysis that could then inform the design of a future system to be deployed with lower risk of harm and better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T17:23:43Z)
• EAIRiskBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [47.69642609574771]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EAIRiskBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Context-Aware Quantitative Risk Assessment Machine Learning Model for Drivers Distraction [0.0]
  Multi-Class Driver Distraction Risk Assessment (MDDRA) model considers the vehicle, driver, and environmental data during a journey. MDDRA categorises the driver on a risk matrix as safe, careless, or dangerous. We apply machine learning techniques to classify and predict driver distraction according to severity levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T23:20:36Z)
• RiskBench: A Scenario-based Benchmark for Risk Identification [4.263035319815899]
  This work focuses on risk identification, the process of identifying and analyzing risks stemming from dynamic traffic participants and unexpected events. We introduce textbfRiskBench, a large-scale scenario-based benchmark for risk identification. We assess the ability of ten algorithms to (1) detect and locate risks, (2) anticipate risks, and (3) facilitate decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T06:21:22Z)
• A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
  This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors. We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z)
• DeepAccident: A Motion and Accident Prediction Benchmark for V2X Autonomous Driving [76.29141888408265]
  We propose a large-scale dataset containing diverse accident scenarios that frequently occur in real-world driving. The proposed DeepAccident dataset includes 57K annotated frames and 285K annotated samples, approximately 7 times more than the large-scale nuScenes dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-03T17:37:00Z)
• Intersection Warning System for Occlusion Risks using Relational Local Dynamic Maps [0.0]
  This work addresses the task of risk evaluation in traffic scenarios with limited observability due to restricted sensorial coverage. To identify the area of sight, we employ ray casting on a local dynamic map providing geometrical information and road infrastructure. Resulting risk indicators are utilized to evaluate the driver's current behavior, to warn the driver in critical situations, to give suggestions on how to act safely or to plan safe trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T16:01:55Z)
• Generating and Characterizing Scenarios for Safety Testing of Autonomous Vehicles [86.9067793493874]
  We propose efficient mechanisms to characterize and generate testing scenarios using a state-of-the-art driving simulator. We use our method to characterize real driving data from the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) project. We rank the scenarios by defining metrics based on the complexity of avoiding accidents and provide insights into how the AV could have minimized the probability of incurring an accident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-12T17:00:23Z)
• Addressing Inherent Uncertainty: Risk-Sensitive Behavior Generation for Automated Driving using Distributional Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  We propose a two-step approach for risk-sensitive behavior generation for self-driving vehicles. First, we learn an optimal policy in an uncertain environment with Deep Distributional Reinforcement Learning. During execution, the optimal risk-sensitive action is selected by applying established risk criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T11:45:12Z)
• Can Autonomous Vehicles Identify, Recover From, and Adapt to Distribution Shifts? [104.04999499189402]
  Out-of-training-distribution (OOD) scenarios are a common challenge of learning agents at deployment. We propose an uncertainty-aware planning method, called emphrobust imitative planning (RIP) Our method can detect and recover from some distribution shifts, reducing the overconfident and catastrophic extrapolations in OOD scenes. We introduce an autonomous car novel-scene benchmark, textttCARNOVEL, to evaluate the robustness of driving agents to a suite of tasks with distribution shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T11:07:32Z)
• Who Make Drivers Stop? Towards Driver-centric Risk Assessment: Risk Object Identification via Causal Inference [19.71459945458985]
  We propose a driver-centric definition of risk, i.e., objects influencing drivers' behavior are risky. We present a novel two-stage risk object identification framework based on causal inference with the proposed object-level manipulable driving model. Our framework achieves a substantial average performance boost over a strong baseline by 7.5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-05T04:14:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.