Interval and fuzzy physics-informed neural networks for uncertain fields

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.13727v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 21:06:42 GMT
• Title: Interval and fuzzy physics-informed neural networks for uncertain fields
• Authors: Jan Niklas Fuhg, Am\'elie Fau, Nikolaos Bouklas
• Abstract summary: Partial differential equations involving fuzzy and interval fields are traditionally solved using the finite element method. In this work we utilize physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to solve interval and fuzzy partial differential equations. The resulting network structures termed interval physics-informed neural networks (iPINNs) and fuzzy physics-informed neural networks (fPINNs) show promising results.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Temporally and spatially dependent uncertain parameters are regularly encountered in engineering applications. Commonly these uncertainties are accounted for using random fields and processes which require knowledge about the appearing probability distributions functions which is not readily available. In these cases non-probabilistic approaches such as interval analysis and fuzzy set theory are helpful uncertainty measures. Partial differential equations involving fuzzy and interval fields are traditionally solved using the finite element method where the input fields are sampled using some basis function expansion methods. This approach however is problematic, as it is reliant on knowledge about the spatial correlation fields. In this work we utilize physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to solve interval and fuzzy partial differential equations. The resulting network structures termed interval physics-informed neural networks (iPINNs) and fuzzy physics-informed neural networks (fPINNs) show promising results for obtaining bounded solutions of equations involving spatially uncertain parameter fields. In contrast to finite element approaches, no correlation length specification of the input fields as well as no averaging via Monte-Carlo simulations are necessary. In fact, information about the input interval fields is obtained directly as a byproduct of the presented solution scheme. Furthermore, all major advantages of PINNs are retained, i.e. meshfree nature of the scheme, and ease of inverse problem set-up.

Related papers

• An efficient wavelet-based physics-informed neural networks for singularly perturbed problems [0.0]
  Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are a class of deep learning models that utilize physics as differential equations. We present an efficient wavelet-based PINNs model to solve singularly perturbed differential equations. The architecture allows the training process to search for a solution within wavelet space, making the process faster and more accurate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-18T10:01:37Z)
• Solving partial differential equations with sampled neural networks [1.8590821261905535]
  Approximation of solutions to partial differential equations (PDE) is an important problem in computational science and engineering. We discuss how sampling the hidden weights and biases of the ansatz network from data-agnostic and data-dependent probability distributions allows us to progress on both challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T14:24:39Z)
• Conformalized Physics-Informed Neural Networks [0.8437187555622164]
  We introduce Conformalized PINNs (C-PINNs) to quantify the uncertainty of PINNs. C-PINNs utilize the framework of conformal prediction to quantify the uncertainty of PINNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T18:45:25Z)
• Uncertainty quantification for noisy inputs-outputs in physics-informed neural networks and neural operators [2.07180164747172]
  We introduce a Bayesian approach to quantify uncertainty arising from noisy inputs-outputs in neural networks (PINNs) and neural operators (NOs) PINNs incorporate physics by including physics-informed terms via automatic differentiation, either in the loss function or the likelihood, and often take as input the spatial-temporal coordinate. We show that this approach can be seamlessly integrated into PINNs and NOs, when they are employed to encode the physical information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-19T08:18:26Z)
• Monte Carlo Neural PDE Solver for Learning PDEs via Probabilistic Representation [59.45669299295436]
  We propose a Monte Carlo PDE solver for training unsupervised neural solvers. We use the PDEs' probabilistic representation, which regards macroscopic phenomena as ensembles of random particles. Our experiments on convection-diffusion, Allen-Cahn, and Navier-Stokes equations demonstrate significant improvements in accuracy and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T08:05:19Z)
• Tunable Complexity Benchmarks for Evaluating Physics-Informed Neural Networks on Coupled Ordinary Differential Equations [64.78260098263489]
  In this work, we assess the ability of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to solve increasingly-complex coupled ordinary differential equations (ODEs) We show that PINNs eventually fail to produce correct solutions to these benchmarks as their complexity increases. We identify several reasons why this may be the case, including insufficient network capacity, poor conditioning of the ODEs, and high local curvature, as measured by the Laplacian of the PINN loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T15:01:32Z)
• Semi-analytic PINN methods for singularly perturbed boundary value problems [0.8594140167290099]
  We propose a new semi-analytic physics informed neural network (PINN) to solve singularly perturbed boundary value problems. The PINN is a scientific machine learning framework that offers a promising perspective for finding numerical solutions to partial differential equations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-19T04:26:40Z)
• Message Passing Neural PDE Solvers [60.77761603258397]
  We build a neural message passing solver, replacing allally designed components in the graph with backprop-optimized neural function approximators. We show that neural message passing solvers representationally contain some classical methods, such as finite differences, finite volumes, and WENO schemes. We validate our method on various fluid-like flow problems, demonstrating fast, stable, and accurate performance across different domain topologies, equation parameters, discretizations, etc., in 1D and 2D.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T17:47:46Z)
• Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networks [55.83255669840384]
  Recent work in scientific machine learning has developed so-called physics-informed neural network (PINN) models. We demonstrate that, while existing PINN methodologies can learn good models for relatively trivial problems, they can easily fail to learn relevant physical phenomena even for simple PDEs. We show that these possible failure modes are not due to the lack of expressivity in the NN architecture, but that the PINN's setup makes the loss landscape very hard to optimize.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T16:06:45Z)
• Conditional physics informed neural networks [85.48030573849712]
  We introduce conditional PINNs (physics informed neural networks) for estimating the solution of classes of eigenvalue problems. We show that a single deep neural network can learn the solution of partial differential equations for an entire class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-06T18:29:14Z)
• Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations [57.90284928158383]
  One of the main challenges in using deep learning-based methods for simulating physical systems is formulating physics-based data. We propose a novel multi-level graph neural network framework that captures interaction at all ranges with only linear complexity. Experiments confirm our multi-graph network learns discretization-invariant solution operators to PDEs and can be evaluated in linear time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T21:56:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.