When Curation Becomes Creation: Algorithms, Microcontent, and the Vanishing Distinction between Platforms and Creators

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00441v1
• Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2021 13:37:05 GMT
• Title: When Curation Becomes Creation: Algorithms, Microcontent, and the Vanishing Distinction between Platforms and Creators
• Authors: Liu Leqi, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Zachary C. Lipton
• Abstract summary: We argue that any coherent regulatory framework must adapt to the modern social media landscape. We argue that any coherent regulatory framework must adapt to this reality.
• Score: 30.71023908707896
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Ever since social activity on the Internet began migrating from the wilds of the open web to the walled gardens erected by so-called platforms, debates have raged about the responsibilities that these platforms ought to bear. And yet, despite intense scrutiny from the news media and grassroots movements of outraged users, platforms continue to operate, from a legal standpoint, on the friendliest terms. Under the current regulatory framework, platforms simultaneously benefit from: (1) broad discretion to organize (and censor) content however they choose; (2) powerful algorithms for curating a practically limitless supply of user-posted microcontent according to whatever ends they wish; and (3) absolution from the sorts of liability born by creators of the underlying content. In this paper, we contest the very validity of the platform-creator distinction, arguing that it is ill-adapted to the modern social media landscape where, in a real sense, platforms are creating derivative media products. We argue that any coherent regulatory framework must adapt to this reality, recognizing the subtle continuum of activities that span the curation-creation spectrum, providing a finer system of categorization and clearer guidance for precisely when platforms assume the responsibilities associated with content creation.

Related papers

• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Private Hierarchical Governance for Encrypted Messaging [20.838090769270607]
  We propose private hierarchical governance systems using E2EE messaging for privacy. We show how an extension to the message layer security protocol suffices for achieving a rich set of governance policies. We build a prototype E2EE messaging system called MlsGov that supports content-based community and platform moderation, elections of community moderators, votes to remove abusive users, and more.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T17:33:23Z)
• How Decentralization Affects User Agency on Social Platforms [0.0]
  We investigate how decentralization might present promise as an alternative model to walled garden platforms. We describe the user-driven content moderation through blocks as an expression of agency on Bluesky, a decentralized social platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T12:15:15Z)
• Content Moderation and the Formation of Online Communities: A Theoretical Framework [7.900694093691988]
  We study the impact of content moderation policies in online communities. We first characterize the effectiveness of a natural class of moderation policies for creating and sustaining stable communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T16:49:44Z)
• A User-Driven Framework for Regulating and Auditing Social Media [94.70018274127231]
  We propose that algorithmic filtering should be regulated with respect to a flexible, user-driven baseline. We require that the feeds a platform filters contain "similar" informational content as their respective baseline feeds. We present an auditing procedure that checks whether a platform honors this requirement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T17:53:34Z)
• Web3: The Next Internet Revolution [50.16560061003771]
  Next internet revolution: Web3 is going to open new opportunities for traditional social models. Decentralized finance will be global, and open with financial inclusiveness for unbanked people. Several worthwhile future research directions of Web3 are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T23:37:43Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Detecting Harmful Content On Online Platforms: What Platforms Need Vs. Where Research Efforts Go [44.774035806004214]
  harmful content on online platforms comes in many different forms including hate speech, offensive language, bullying and harassment, misinformation, spam, violence, graphic content, sexual abuse, self harm, and many other. Online platforms seek to moderate such content to limit societal harm, to comply with legislation, and to create a more inclusive environment for their users. There is currently a dichotomy between what types of harmful content online platforms seek to curb, and what research efforts there are to automatically detect such content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-27T08:01:10Z)
• ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Dataset [6.59720246184989]
  We present 'ETHOS', a textual dataset with two variants: binary and multi-label, based on YouTube and Reddit comments validated using the Figure-Eight crowdsourcing platform. Our key assumption is that, even gaining a small amount of labelled data from such a time-consuming process, we can guarantee hate speech occurrences in the examined material.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T08:59:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.