Memory-Sample Lower Bounds for Learning Parity with Noise

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.02320v1
• Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 23:34:39 GMT
• Title: Memory-Sample Lower Bounds for Learning Parity with Noise
• Authors: Sumegha Garg, Pravesh K. Kothari, Pengda Liu and Ran Raz
• Abstract summary: We show, for the well-studied problem of learning parity under noise, that any learning algorithm requires either a memory of size $Omega(n2/varepsilon)$ or an exponential number of samples. Our proof is based on adapting the arguments in [Raz'17,GRT'18] to the noisy case.
• Score: 2.724141845301679
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this work, we show, for the well-studied problem of learning parity under noise, where a learner tries to learn $x=(x_1,\ldots,x_n) \in \{0,1\}^n$ from a stream of random linear equations over $\mathrm{F}_2$ that are correct with probability $\frac{1}{2}+\varepsilon$ and flipped with probability $\frac{1}{2}-\varepsilon$, that any learning algorithm requires either a memory of size $\Omega(n^2/\varepsilon)$ or an exponential number of samples. In fact, we study memory-sample lower bounds for a large class of learning problems, as characterized by [GRT'18], when the samples are noisy. A matrix $M: A \times X \rightarrow \{-1,1\}$ corresponds to the following learning problem with error parameter $\varepsilon$: an unknown element $x \in X$ is chosen uniformly at random. A learner tries to learn $x$ from a stream of samples, $(a_1, b_1), (a_2, b_2) \ldots$, where for every $i$, $a_i \in A$ is chosen uniformly at random and $b_i = M(a_i,x)$ with probability $1/2+\varepsilon$ and $b_i = -M(a_i,x)$ with probability $1/2-\varepsilon$ ($0<\varepsilon< \frac{1}{2}$). Assume that $k,\ell, r$ are such that any submatrix of $M$ of at least $2^{-k} \cdot |A|$ rows and at least $2^{-\ell} \cdot |X|$ columns, has a bias of at most $2^{-r}$. We show that any learning algorithm for the learning problem corresponding to $M$, with error, requires either a memory of size at least $\Omega\left(\frac{k \cdot \ell}{\varepsilon} \right)$, or at least $2^{\Omega(r)}$ samples. In particular, this shows that for a large class of learning problems, same as those in [GRT'18], any learning algorithm requires either a memory of size at least $\Omega\left(\frac{(\log |X|) \cdot (\log |A|)}{\varepsilon}\right)$ or an exponential number of noisy samples. Our proof is based on adapting the arguments in [Raz'17,GRT'18] to the noisy case.

Related papers

• The Communication Complexity of Approximating Matrix Rank [50.6867896228563]
  We show that this problem has randomized communication complexity $Omega(frac1kcdot n2log|mathbbF|)$. As an application, we obtain an $Omega(frac1kcdot n2log|mathbbF|)$ space lower bound for any streaming algorithm with $k$ passes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T06:21:42Z)
• Sample-Efficient Linear Regression with Self-Selection Bias [7.605563562103568]
  We consider the problem of linear regression with self-selection bias in the unknown-index setting. We provide a novel and near optimally sample-efficient (in terms of $k$) algorithm to recover $mathbfw_1,ldots,mathbfw_kin. Our algorithm succeeds under significantly relaxed noise assumptions, and therefore also succeeds in the related setting of max-linear regression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T02:20:24Z)
• Distribution-Independent Regression for Generalized Linear Models with Oblivious Corruptions [49.69852011882769]
  We show the first algorithms for the problem of regression for generalized linear models (GLMs) in the presence of additive oblivious noise. We present an algorithm that tackles newthis problem in its most general distribution-independent setting. This is the first newalgorithmic result for GLM regression newwith oblivious noise which can handle more than half the samples being arbitrarily corrupted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T21:41:59Z)
• Fast $(1+\varepsilon)$-Approximation Algorithms for Binary Matrix Factorization [54.29685789885059]
  We introduce efficient $(1+varepsilon)$-approximation algorithms for the binary matrix factorization (BMF) problem. The goal is to approximate $mathbfA$ as a product of low-rank factors. Our techniques generalize to other common variants of the BMF problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T18:55:27Z)
• Optimal SQ Lower Bounds for Learning Halfspaces with Massart Noise [9.378684220920562]
  tightest statistical query (SQ) lower bounds for learnining halfspaces in the presence of Massart noise. We show that for arbitrary $eta in [0,1/2]$ every SQ algorithm achieving misclassification error better than $eta$ requires queries of superpolynomial accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-24T17:33:19Z)
• Learning low-degree functions from a logarithmic number of random queries [77.34726150561087]
  We prove that for any integer $ninmathbbN$, $din1,ldots,n$ and any $varepsilon,deltain(0,1)$, a bounded function $f:-1,1nto[-1,1]$ of degree at most $d$ can be learned.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-21T13:19:04Z)
• Threshold Phenomena in Learning Halfspaces with Massart Noise [56.01192577666607]
  We study the problem of PAC learning halfspaces on $mathbbRd$ with Massart noise under Gaussian marginals. Our results qualitatively characterize the complexity of learning halfspaces in the Massart model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-19T16:16:48Z)
• The Sparse Hausdorff Moment Problem, with Application to Topic Models [5.151973524974052]
  We give an algorithm for identifying a $k$-mixture using samples of $m=2k$ iid binary random variables. It suffices to know the moments to additive accuracy $w_mincdotzetaO(k)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-16T04:23:57Z)
• Model-Free Reinforcement Learning: from Clipped Pseudo-Regret to Sample Complexity [59.34067736545355]
  Given an MDP with $S$ states, $A$ actions, the discount factor $gamma in (0,1)$, and an approximation threshold $epsilon > 0$, we provide a model-free algorithm to learn an $epsilon$-optimal policy. For small enough $epsilon$, we show an improved algorithm with sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-06T13:34:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.