Generative and reproducible benchmarks for comprehensive evaluation of machine learning classifiers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.06475v1
• Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 03:58:02 GMT
• Title: Generative and reproducible benchmarks for comprehensive evaluation of machine learning classifiers
• Authors: Patryk Orzechowski and Jason H. Moore
• Abstract summary: DIverse and GENerative ML Benchmark (DIGEN) is a collection of synthetic datasets for benchmarking of machine learning algorithms. The resource with extensive documentation and analyses is open-source and available on GitHub.
• Score: 6.605210393590192
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of machine learning (ML) algorithms is crucial for determine their scope of application. Here, we introduce the DIverse and GENerative ML Benchmark (DIGEN) - a collection of synthetic datasets for comprehensive, reproducible, and interpretable benchmarking of machine learning algorithms for classification of binary outcomes. The DIGEN resource consists of 40 mathematical functions which map continuous features to discrete endpoints for creating synthetic datasets. These 40 functions were discovered using a heuristic algorithm designed to maximize the diversity of performance among multiple popular machine learning algorithms thus providing a useful test suite for evaluating and comparing new methods. Access to the generative functions facilitates understanding of why a method performs poorly compared to other algorithms thus providing ideas for improvement. The resource with extensive documentation and analyses is open-source and available on GitHub.

Related papers

• Relation-aware Ensemble Learning for Knowledge Graph Embedding [68.94900786314666]
  We propose to learn an ensemble by leveraging existing methods in a relation-aware manner. exploring these semantics using relation-aware ensemble leads to a much larger search space than general ensemble methods. We propose a divide-search-combine algorithm RelEns-DSC that searches the relation-wise ensemble weights independently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:40:12Z)
• Multi-Dimensional Ability Diagnosis for Machine Learning Algorithms [88.93372675846123]
  We propose a task-agnostic evaluation framework Camilla for evaluating machine learning algorithms. We use cognitive diagnosis assumptions and neural networks to learn the complex interactions among algorithms, samples and the skills of each sample. In our experiments, Camilla outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on the metric reliability, rank consistency and rank stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T03:15:56Z)
• Provably Efficient Representation Learning with Tractable Planning in Low-Rank POMDP [81.00800920928621]
  We study representation learning in partially observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) We first present an algorithm for decodable POMDPs that combines maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and optimism in the face of uncertainty (OFU) We then show how to adapt this algorithm to also work in the broader class of $gamma$-observable POMDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T16:04:03Z)
• Performance Evaluation and Comparison of a New Regression Algorithm [4.125187280299247]
  We compare the performance of a newly proposed regression algorithm against four conventional machine learning algorithms. The reader is free to replicate our results since we have provided the source code in a GitHub repository.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T13:01:16Z)
• Unified Functional Hashing in Automatic Machine Learning [58.77232199682271]
  We show that large efficiency gains can be obtained by employing a fast unified functional hash. Our hash is "functional" in that it identifies equivalent candidates even if they were represented or coded differently. We show dramatic improvements on multiple AutoML domains, including neural architecture search and algorithm discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T18:50:37Z)
• A Framework and Benchmarking Study for Counterfactual Generating Methods on Tabular Data [0.0]
  Counterfactual explanations are viewed as an effective way to explain machine learning predictions. There are already dozens of algorithms aiming to generate such explanations. benchmarking study and framework can help practitioners in determining which technique and building blocks most suit their context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T21:06:03Z)
• Synthetic Benchmarks for Scientific Research in Explainable Machine Learning [14.172740234933215]
  We release XAI-Bench: a suite of synthetic datasets and a library for benchmarking feature attribution algorithms. Unlike real-world datasets, synthetic datasets allow the efficient computation of conditional expected values. We demonstrate the power of our library by benchmarking popular explainability techniques across several evaluation metrics and identifying failure modes for popular explainers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-23T17:10:21Z)
• Memory-Based Optimization Methods for Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning and Personalized Federated Learning [56.17603785248675]
  Model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) has become a popular research area. Existing MAML algorithms rely on the episode' idea by sampling a few tasks and data points to update the meta-model at each iteration. This paper proposes memory-based algorithms for MAML that converge with vanishing error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T08:47:58Z)
• Functorial Manifold Learning [1.14219428942199]
  We first characterize manifold learning algorithms as functors that map pseudometric spaces to optimization objectives. We then use this characterization to prove refinement bounds on manifold learning loss functions and construct a hierarchy of manifold learning algorithms. We express several popular manifold learning algorithms as functors at different levels of this hierarchy, including Metric Multidimensional Scaling, IsoMap, and UMAP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T02:30:23Z)
• Fast Few-Shot Classification by Few-Iteration Meta-Learning [173.32497326674775]
  We introduce a fast optimization-based meta-learning method for few-shot classification. Our strategy enables important aspects of the base learner objective to be learned during meta-training. We perform a comprehensive experimental analysis, demonstrating the speed and effectiveness of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-01T15:59:31Z)
• Guidelines for enhancing data locality in selected machine learning algorithms [0.0]
  We analyze one of the means to increase the performances of machine learning algorithms which is exploiting data locality. Repeated data access can be seen as redundancy in data movement. This work also identifies some of the opportunities for avoiding these redundancies by directly reusing results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-09T14:16:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.